Canada: Conviction About Convictions - How Not To Gauge Success In The Prosecution Of Corporate And White Collar Crime

Last Updated: February 5 2013
Article by Brandon Barnes

In light of the recent decision of R v. Dunn, in which the former CEO, CFO, and Controller of Nortel Networks Inc. were acquitted of fraud, the question of whether Canada is a tough jurisdiction for corporate criminals has again become a subject of popular discussion. Unfavourable comparisons are made to the United States (for example, this piece, or this one from 2009), where the news can seem replete with high-profile convictions of celebrity businesspeople. In Canada, however, the spectre of Bre-X haunts the collective imagination as a debacle: 15 years after the mining company's spectacular collapse, no-one has been successfully prosecuted in respect of it.

Is Canada soft on business crime? Does the risk-reward proposition of cooking books and deceiving investors favour the fraudulent? I don't know, and I suggest to you that nobody does. The data set of potential convictions is small, and "white collar crime" is an umbrella term covering everything from insider trading to bribing foreign officials to Ponzi schemes to reckless bonus-seeking by top-level management. The fact scenarios, witnesses, and available evidence vary broadly when dealing with corporate actors. 

Against this uncertainty, I can say most definitely that, however we evaluate the state of corporate crime in Canada, one popular means of doing so is unambiguously bad for the purpose: the rate of convictions versus acquittals at trial.  

If the criminal justice system is feeble in the face of corporate wrongdoing, I suggest the root of the weakness would be a mixture of the following problems:

  • The law does not actually penalize the acts in question, a statutory problem;
  • The crimes are hard to prove on the facts, being an evidentiary problem;
  • The Crown, or the Bench, don't understand the complexities of the evidence, a competence problem;
  • The Crown, or the police, do not want to investigate or bring prosecutions of white collar crime, either for reasons of trepidation (another form of the competence problem) or because their resources are better spent elsewhere (a fiscal problem);
  • The process takes too long, such that prosecutions are not timely and the rights of the accused to speedy justice are denied (also a fiscal problem) or
  •  The criminals are not adequately punished, a sentencing problem.

Sentencing is wholly disconnected from the conviction rate; whether punishments are too light or fail to fit the crime is an issue that only arises after a conviction is obtained. It is arguable that light sentences are a factor of the fiscal problem – they discourage prosecutors from devoting resources to corporate criminal cases. I doubt this is a major concern, however. Even with the introduction of mandatory minimums for certain offences, sentencing is often a separate legal battle with its own nuances and niceties. Prosecutors are more likely to have the attitude of most trial lawyers that "a win is a win", and to proceed if the evidence is strong, even if the punishment seems lenient.

Fiscal issues are an easy culprit for Canada's perceived white collar crime free-for-all. More resources would always be of benefit to the criminal justice system (and the system as a whole, for that matter), but the consequence of insufficient funds is likely not a large number of half-hearted prosecutions, but rather a small number of focused, high-likelihood-of-return ones. The danger with spending cuts is that the organs of the justice system simply do less, rather than spread themselves thinly to the point of irrelevance.  

Problems of competence have attracted particular attention in response to the Nortel decision, as accounting principles, the testimony of financially literate witnesses, and several years' worth of financial statements were key pieces of evidence in that case. Again, an assumption that convictions equal competence is false, as the interests of the Bench and the Crown diverge if either is hypothetically uncertain, or falsely confident, of its own intellectual reach.  

If a Judge has doubts about a case being tried before her, the law provides an answer: not guilty. In this sense, convictions and competence might seem to correlate. However, the Judge is not in the court room to provide expertise on accounting or business practices; even if she happens to be proficient in those areas of knowledge (and such judges certainly do exist). The Judge hears the evidence before her and makes a determination. If the evidence is confusing, inarticulate, or inexplicable to an intelligent layperson, the Crown (who is presenting the case) is responsible. And if the Crown cannot appreciate, for want of expertise, the quality of its case against a corporate criminal defendant, aside from all the means it has of overcoming such a deficit, the probable result will be no prosecution, not a shot-in-the-dark trial led by doubting advocates.  

Doubt is not the only manifestation of incompetence – false confidence could be the expression of the Crown and Bench's hypothetical lack of sophistication in business matters. When viewed in this way, the suggested link between competence and convictions really breaks down. If the Bench is falsely confident, more convictions (presumably some unjust ones) could be expected to result. If the Crown is falsely confident, a low conviction rate would vindicate our system, as the Bench is providing a suitable check on the Crown's ineptitude. Once an element of uncertainty is introduced in the mind of any actor in the system, uncertain outcomes result. Convictions, acquittals, and sentences would be totally unpredictable if the prosecutors and judges simply didn't know what they were doing.

For the record, I believe the Crown and the Bench are more than capable of tackling any matter of business crime. Underestimations of the individual skills of judges and lawyers are made at defence counsel's peril.

Returning to my checklist, the statutory problem and the evidentiary problem rarely appear at trial. Again, they discourage the prosecution of white collar criminal matters altogether. A high evidentiary burden is a feature of criminal justice generally; and although some prosecutions founder on account of complex evidentiary matters, such events are rare.

Finally, it is important to remember that the justice process has many stages with varying interests at play -- acquittals at trial may be a sign that the best cases are settled by guilty pleas. Plea deals can give rise to just and informative results. This has certainly been the experience of lawyers familiar with the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, as demonstrated last week.  

To focus on the conviction rate as a gauge for the ruggedness of the criminal justice system in the face of white collar crime is to misunderstand how the process works. A prosecution is a complicated thing, and no two accounting frauds or bribe scandals are alike. The suitability of our system to tackle large prosecutions of financial and business crime matters is a worthwhile concern for Canadian voters and taxpayers, but not out of proportion with vigilance for the health of the system on the whole.  

1. Full disclosure: I used to practice with Michael O'Kane at Peters & Peters in London, UK, quoted in the article at the link.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions