Canada: Short Tips For Preparing For The 2013 Proxy Season In Canada

Last year was an unusual year in Canada with regards to developments that affect public company securityholder meetings. Unlike in past years, the changes did not focus so much on initiatives by the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) requiring, in particular, enhanced disclosure to securityholders. Rather, in 2012, shareholder activists, Canadian courts, stock exchanges and proxy advisors, in addition to the CSA, all contributed to a dynamic environment that should affect issuers’ thinking about this year’s securityholder meetings.

To assist in preparing for the 2013 proxy season, this article highlights certain developments over the last year which may be of particular relevance to corporate secretaries and in-house counsel of public companies.

1. Shareholder Activism

High-profile proxy battles in Canada in 2012, such as those at TELUS Corporation and Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, should serve as reminders to public companies of the value of keeping informed and thinking ahead. No issuer is immune from shareholder activism, and some shareholder activism is, arguably, not in the best interests of all shareholders. It is important for an issuer to stay connected with its shareholder base, and be aware of trading activities and other investor strategies. Information on shareholder sentiment and activities is relevant to virtually all aspects of meeting preparation, including the timing of the meeting and record date, the location of the meeting, the resolutions proposed to be tabled at the meeting, and the disclosure in the proxy circular. An issuer which does not routinely gather such information and take it into account in planning its annual general meeting (and as part of its governance and investor relations generally) should make a concerted effort to do so well in advance of its meeting.

2. Slate Voting

Recent amendments to the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) Company Manual now require all TSX-listed issuers to permit their securityholders to vote for the election of each director individually. This is in line with the TSX Venture Exchange Corporate Finance Manual, which provides that issuers must not construct mechanisms that entrench existing management, such as the election of a slate of directors, if shareholders are not permitted to choose whether to elect the board as a slate or to elect directors individually.

Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) has confirmed that, for the 2013 proxy season, it will generally recommend, where there is an uncontested directors’ election, that shareholders withhold votes from all directors nominated by slate ballot.

3. Majority Voting Policies

A majority voting policy typically requires a director who receives a majority of “withhold” votes to tender his or her resignation. As discussed in more detail in our earlier MarketCaps article, the TSX Company Manual has been amended to provide that a TSX-listed issuer subject to National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations must disclose in its securityholder meeting materials whether it has adopted a majority voting policy for the election of directors for uncontested meetings. If a policy has not been adopted, the issuer must explain in its securityholder meeting materials (i) its practices for electing directors and (ii) why it has not adopted a majority voting policy. If a policy has been adopted, the TSX expects that an issuer will provide fulsome disclosure of that policy (which might include, for example, information with respect to any principles or policies that the board might apply if it has discretion to accept or reject a resignation). Note also that, after each meeting at which directors have been elected, TSX-listed issuers are required to (i) notify the TSX if a director has received a majority of “withhold” votes (if a majority voting policy has not been adopted) and (ii) promptly issue a press release providing detailed disclosure of the voting results for the election of directors.

Concurrent with the adoption of the amendments referenced above, the TSX published further proposed amendments to the TSX Company Manual that would require its listed issuers to have majority voting for director elections at uncontested meetings. Subject to Ontario Securities Commission approval, the TSX anticipates that this proposal would become effective as of December 31, 2013.

In its updated proxy voting guidelines for the 2013 proxy season, Glass Lewis & Co., LLC (Glass Lewis) has advised that it will recommend that securityholders withhold votes from all members of an issuer’s governance committee if the issuer is in the S&P/TSX composite index and has not adopted a majority voting policy.

4. Telephone Proxy Solicitation (Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines)

This past summer, the British Columbia Supreme Court in International Energy and Mineral Resources Investment (Hong Kong) Company Limited v. Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Limited granted an order declaring a previously held contested annual general meeting to be invalid, and all resolutions passed at the meeting to be null and void, after the court found “serious flaws” in the voting procedures used by Mosquito which were found to have had an oppressive and unfairly prejudicial effect on the dissident shareholder’s right to a fair and transparent process in the context of the contested meeting. Mosquito had utilized its proxy solicitor’s telephone solicitation system to solicit proxies for the contested shareholder meeting. The system used call centre operators, employed by the proxy solicitor, to call registered shareholders and NOBOs (non-objecting beneficial shareholders) and to take their votes by asking them to verbally authorize the proxy solicitor to execute a proxy or voting instruction form on their behalf. Call centre operators were permitted to accept as truthful an oral representation from a person at the telephone number that they were the person entitled to vote, or that they had the authority to vote on behalf of a shareholder.

Although Mosquito’s management information circular indicated that proxies could be solicited by telephone, the court found that the circular contained insufficient disclosure regarding the voting process. The court identified several flaws in the telephone solicitation system used by Mosquito, such as its reliance on an oral grant of authority, its failure to use a unique identifier to identify shareholders, its incomplete record linking the chain in the line of intermediaries (i.e., in respect of NOBOs, the proxy solicitor did not have omnibus proxies from the registered holder (CDS) to Broadridge or from Broadridge to the transfer agent), its failure to provide a contemporaneous and verifiable record of voting instructions, and its failure to ensure that shareholders were permitted to make their voting choices privately and without undue pressure from a proxy solicitor.

The Mosquito case illustrates that issuers using a system such as the telephone solicitation system used by Mosquito must consider whether sufficient safeguards are in place to ensure that proxies and voting instructions are properly given and that securityholders have the freedom to vote as they choose. Further, issuers will need to carefully consider the disclosure included in their management information circulars relating to proxy solicitation and voting procedures.

5. Advance Notice Requirements (Mundoro Capital)

The past year also saw the successful “stealth proxy contest” at QLT Inc., where dissidents successfully replaced the board with their own slate of directors that was proposed at the annual general meeting, without a dissident circular having been publicly circulated in advance of the meeting. This was possible under certain exemptions allowing a dissident to contact a small number of securityholders without having to widely distribute a dissident circular, and because nominations may be made from the floor.

One way for an issuer to prevent these sorts of stealth tactics is to adopt an advance notice requirement by adopting a policy or bylaw that generally requires shareholders to give advance notice of their intention to nominate directors for election at an upcoming shareholders’ meeting (which prevents other shareholders from being “ambushed” with a last-minute nomination at the meeting). Both ISS and Glass Lewis will generally support the adoption of an advance notice requirement pursuant to which shareholders are required to notify the issuer not more than 65 days and not less than 30 days before the meeting if they intend to nominate new directors to the board.

The validity of an advance notice policy was recently considered by the British Columbia Supreme Court in Northern Minerals Investment Corp. v. Mundoro Capital Inc. In this particular case, the policy (which was implemented shortly before a scheduled shareholder meeting) was allowed to stand, with the court noting that the policy ensured an informed nomination process, and prevented a small group of dissident shareholders from potentially taking advantage of a poorly attended shareholders’ meeting to impose their slate of directors on the unsuspecting majority. An issuer considering an advance notice policy or bylaw should take steps to ensure that it is implemented in an orderly manner and in accordance with its governing statute, to prevent any argument that it is unenforceable or is being put in place to influence or preclude a proxy contest.

6. Executive Compensation


Say-on-pay (non-binding shareholder votes on executive compensation) remains a voluntary practice in Canada, but it continued to gain momentum in 2012. As of the end of the year, there were 100 Canadian issuers which had voluntarily adopted say-on-pay, according to the list maintained by the Shareholder Association for Research & Education (SHARE). However, the 2012 proxy season also marked the first time that a Canadian issuer failed to obtain majority shareholder support on its say-on-pay vote. The shareholders of QLT Inc. voted against a resolution approving, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the company’s named executive officers. In 2011, QLT Inc. shareholders had approved the say-on-pay vote. Another notable aspect of last year’s Canadian say-on-pay results is that the percentage of Canadian companies that received less than 75 per cent support for their say-on–pay votes increased, according to SHARE. In light of these trends, issuers will need to consider carefully whether or not to include a say-on-pay vote as part of their upcoming securityholder meeting and to assess shareholder sentiment on such a vote.

ISS Evaluation of Executive Compensation

Aligning executive pay with company performance will increasingly be a focal point with respect to say-on-pay and other votes in the 2013 proxy season. ISS has advised that it will generally recommend against management say-on-pay proposals, as well as equity-based incentive plan proposals and the election of directors who are compensation committee members, if, in its view, there is significant long-term misalignment between executive pay and company performance. ISS has adopted a new methodology for the 2013 proxy season for determining whether there is such misalignment, which will involve both a quantitative and qualitative assessment. Issuers would be well advised to review the new methodology against their executive compensation practices to see whether or not ISS may recommend a negative or withhold vote for any of their upcoming securityholder resolutions.

7. Notice-and-access

At the end of November 2012, the CSA adopted amendments to allow for “notice-and-access”, which, if all necessary ministerial approvals are obtained, will be available to issuers in respect of securityholder meetings taking place on or after March 1, 2013. With notice-and-access, a reporting issuer (other than an investment fund) may deliver proxy-related materials to shareholders by (a) posting the relevant information circular (and, if applicable, other proxy-related materials) on a non-SEDAR website and (b) sending a notice package to shareholders which informs beneficial owners that the proxy-related materials have been posted, and explains how to access them. Notice-and-access potentially will save issuers significant costs in printing and mailing paper copies of securityholder meeting materials. When using notice-and-access for the first time, however, an issuer will need to take a number of steps and implement changes with regards to several established procedures. For example, under notice-and-access, an issuer must set the record date for notice of the meeting to be at least 40 days before the meeting, and must file a notification at least 25 days before such record date (i.e., at least 65 days before the date of the meeting). Depending upon the lead time that may be needed to adopt these steps and changes, an issuer may or may not be able to adopt notice-and-access for the 2013 proxy season. In addition, it is important for issuers to consider their ability to make use of notice-and-access under their governing statute.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
8 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

The prospect of an internal investigation raises many thorny issues. This presentation will canvass some of the potential triggering events, and discuss how to structure an investigation, retain forensic assistance and manage the inevitable ethical issues that will arise.

22 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

From the boardroom to the shop floor, effective organizations recognize the value of having a diverse workplace. This presentation will explore effective strategies to promote diversity, defeat bias and encourage a broader community outlook.

7 Dec 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

Staying local but going global presents its challenges. Gowling WLG lawyers offer an international roundtable on doing business in the U.K., France, Germany, China and Russia. This three-hour session will videoconference in lawyers from around the world to discuss business and intellectual property hurdles.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.