Canada: Duty To Consult Fosters Change To Yukon Mineral Claims Regime


At the end of 2012, the Yukon Court of Appeal, a court which is comprised of British Columbia Court of Appeal judges, issued its decision in Ross River Dena Council v. Government of Yukon, confirming that the Yukon government's "open entry" registration system for quartz mineral claims is subject to the Crown's obligation to consult with First Nations. Interestingly, and consistent with the lower court's decision, the Court of Appeal suspended its ruling for one year to allow the government to consider statutory and regulatory changes to the mining regime which would provide for appropriate consultation.

One of the most salient aspects of this decision is the court's consideration of the responsibility of the legislature to address the duty to consult when legislation is introduced – a currently unresolved issue before the courts. The Ross River Dena case provides a timely discussion of this issue given that 2013 has started with the high-profile "Idle No More" campaign by First Nations, ignited by their view that federal environmental legislation and changes to the Indian Act introduced in 2012 were done without consultation. On January 8, 2013, a judicial review application was filed by the Frog Lake First Nation in Alberta, seeking to confirm that the federal government has a duty to consult with the Nation both in the development of environmental policies and the introduction of two omnibus statutes namely, the Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act (also known as Bill C-38) and the Jobs and Growth Act (also known as Bill C-45). In its application, the Frog Lake Nation alleged that Canada "has abdicated its core obligation under Treaty 6 (i.e., to protect and manage the lands comprising Frog Lake's traditional territory to ensure the Nation has a meaningful ability to exercise its treaty rights) and acted contrary to the honour of the Crown".

The Ross River Dena case will be of interest to businesses dealing with the development of natural resources, as the case (1) prompts an examination of a particular legislative scheme to ensure it provides for adequate consultation with First Nations; and (2) draws a bright line between a duty to consult in relation to the introduction of legislation versus its implementation, thus potentially preventing the success of applications like that of the Frog Lake First Nation.

Key Facts

The plaintiff, the Ross River Dena Council, is a member of the larger Kaska First Nation, which is one of three Yukon First Nations that has not entered into a modern treaty to resolve its land claims. Their claim area extends over 63,000 km² of the southwestern Yukon (the Ross River Area).

Under the Yukon Quartz Mining Act (the Act), an individual can acquire hard rock mineral rights simply by physically staking a claim and subsequently recording it with the mining recorder. Once the claim is recorded, the claimant is entitled to the minerals and may conduct certain exploration activities on the land without further authorization and notice to the government. This is referred to as an "open entry" system. The mining recorder cannot refuse to record a claim that complies with the statutory requirements.

Under the Act and its related regulation, the holder of a mineral claim is entitled to undertake a Class 1 exploration program without providing notice to the government or its officials, and without obtaining permission from any person. Class 1 activities can include the clearing of land, the construction of lines, corridors and temporary trails, the use of explosives and removal of subsurface rock. Furthermore, pursuant to the applicable Yukon environmental assessment regime, Class 1 exploration activities take place without notice to or consultation with First Nations. However, this automatic exploration right with the mineral grant is not the standard across Canada. It is more typical that an additional permit be obtained, thus separately triggering the duty to consult.

Lower Court Decision

The Ross River Dena Council brought an application in the Yukon Territory Supreme Court for a declaration that the government had a duty to consult prior to recording a grant of quartz mineral claims within the Ross River Area. The court held that the government's practices in respect of new mineral claims under the Act did not meet the consultation requirements as required by the Haida case. Having said this, the court held that these requirements would be satisfied by a scheme under which the government provided notice, after registration, to the Ross River Dena Council of newly recorded quartz mining claims within the Ross River Area. The Ross River Dena Council appealed this decision.

Court of Appeal Decision

The court commenced its analysis by referring to the Supreme Court of Canada's ruling in the Haida case and highlighting that the duty to consult is founded on the Crown's duty to act honourably in its dealings with First Nations (see our Blakes Bulletin: Supreme Court of Canada Decisions in Haida and Taku River). The Court of Appeal then dealt with two main issues in applying the three-pronged test described in Haida/Rio Tinto (see our Blakes Bulletin: Historical Infringements Do Not Trigger Current Consultation Duty) for the duty to consult:

  • Does the Crown have knowledge, actual or constructive, of a potential aboriginal claim or right?
  • Is there contemplated Crown conduct?
  • Is there a potential that the contemplated conduct may adversely affect an aboriginal claim or right?

Does the Recording of a Mineral Claim Trigger Consultation?

The court stated that there is no doubt that the first element of the test (i.e., the Crown's knowledge, actual or constructive, of a potential aboriginal claim or right) is present when a mineral claim is recorded within the Ross River Area. The court acknowledged that the parties had a long history of land claims negotiations and interim agreements in respect of the area. The government itself conceded that it has knowledge of the plaintiff's asserted aboriginal rights.

Similarly, the court stated that there is no doubt that the third element of the test (i.e., the potential that the contemplated Crown conduct may adversely affect an aboriginal claim or right) is met where the Crown registers a mining claim within the Ross River Area. In transferring mineral rights to mining claim holders, the Crown engages in conduct that is inconsistent with the recognition of aboriginal title. As well, the claimholder's right to engage in Class 1 exploration programs may adversely affect claimed aboriginal rights. While Class 1 exploration programs are limited, they may still seriously impede or prevent the enjoyment of some aboriginal rights in more than a transient or trivial manner.

The crux of the litigation was whether the second element of the test (i.e., the contemplated Crown conduct) is engaged. The government argued that the recording of a mineral claim is not "contemplated Crown conduct" (where the government is actively making a decision) because the statute does not give the mining recorder any discretion in respect of the recording of the claim – if the quartz mining claim formally complies with the requirements of the statute, the mining recorder must record it. The Court of Appeal did not accept that the statutory regime in the Act was devoid of discretion given the ability of the government to prohibit quartz mining claims on particular lands (such as protected areas set aside). The government further said that because the granting of a mineral claim is automatic when the statutory requirements are met, there is no duty to consult. In support of its argument, the government pointed out that the Supreme Court of Canada has expressly left open the question of whether legislative action constitutes government conduct for the purposes of the test. In this regard, the Court of Appeal stated:

[37] The duty to consult exists to ensure that the Crown does not manage its resources in a manner that ignores Aboriginal claims. It is a mechanism by which the claims of First Nations can be reconciled with the Crown's right to manage resources.Statutory regimes that do not allow for consultation and fail to provide any other equally effective means to acknowledge and accommodate Aboriginal claims are defective and cannot be allowed to subsist.

[39] I acknowledge that in Rio Tinto the Supreme Court of Canada left open the question of whether "government conduct" includes legislative action. I read that reservation narrowly, however. It may be that the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty precludes the imposition of a requirement that governments consult with First Nations before introducing legislation (...) Such a limitation on the duty to consult would, however, only apply to the introduction of the legislation itself, and could not justify the absence of consultation in the carrying out of a statutory regime. [our emphasis]

Is Giving Notice Sufficient?

In the end, the Court of Appeal stated that it is not necessary or appropriate, in this proceeding, to specify precisely how the Yukon regime can be brought into conformity with the requirements of Haida. Instead, the court stated that what is required is that consultations be meaningful, and that the system allow for accommodation to take place, where required, before claimed aboriginal title or rights are adversely affected. Specifically, the court added that at least where Class 1 exploration activities will have serious or long-lasting adverse effects on claimed aboriginal rights, the Crown must be in a position to engage in consultations with First Nations before the activities are allowed to take place and that affected First Nations must be provided with notice of the proposed activities and, where appropriate, an opportunity to consult beforehand.

In this vein, the court held that mere notice of a newly recorded quartz mineral claim cannot suffice as the sole mechanism of consultation and a more elaborate system must be incorporated into the statutory regime.


The Ross River Dena decision is noteworthy for two main reasons. First, this case prompts an examination of a particular legislative scheme, such as the Act, to ensure that it provides adequate consultation for First Nations in its design. This issue appears to be topical in other jurisdictions, especially as it relates to legislative schemes concerning mining. In fact, as recently as November 1, 2012, Ontario amended its Mining Act to ensure that affected First Nations are consulted prior to substantive exploration work based on litigation in Ontario similar to the Ross River Dena case. It remains to be seen whether the Yukon government will follow or expand on Ontario's example in a way that balances and protects the right of free entry for mineral tenures.

Second, the court illuminates a grey area in the current case law by distinguishing between the necessity of consultation in relation to the introduction of legislation as opposed to consultation in relation to the implementation of legislation. As such, the case seems to close the door to legal challenges like that of Frog Lake First Nation, wherein the applicant is asserting that a duty to consult is required in relation to the introduction of legislation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
20 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Canada’s payment industry is constantly evolving. Legislation and expectations of regulators are also changing but not at the same pace as the industry. This seminar will feature Blakes lawyers who will provide insight into the recent developments in the regulation of payments in Canada.

20 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

As Canada’s payment industry continues to evolve, legislation and expectations of regulators are simultaneously shifting. With fintech transforming traditional payment models, complex regulatory requirements, compliance and risk mitigation considerations, there is much to discuss.

27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Commercial Real Estate group as they discuss five key provisions of a commercial real estate purchase agreement that are often the subject of much negotiation but are sometimes misunderstood.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.