Canada: HST Update: Taxation Issues In Real Estate Transactions

Last Updated: December 4 2012
Article by Michael Bussmann

This paper provides a brief legislative and case law update on the Harmonized Sales Tax ("HST") and the Goods and Services Tax ("GST") in the context of real estate transactions. The GST/HST are imposed under the Excise Tax Act (Canada) (the "Act").


1. British Columbia

On August 26, 2011, it was announced that 54.73% of British Columbians that had voted in the referendum had voted in favour of replacing the 12% HST with the 5% GST and a 7% Provincial Sales Tax.

The British Columbia government immediately announced that the transition is to occur on April 1, 2013. The transitional rules for the HST have been released and are consistent with similar transitional rules on the introduction of the HST in British Columbia and Ontario. British Columbia enacted the new Provincial Sales Tax Act (British Columbia) on May 31, 2012, but not the regulations thereunder. All exemptions under the old Social Services Tax Act (British Columbia) are to be reproduced in the regulations, which are expected late this fall. Some amendments to the Provincial Sales Tax Act are also expected in advance of April 1, 2013.

In February 2012, it was announced that there would be enhanced new housing rebates for residential real property in British Columbia. As with the existing rebates, the rebates apply to newly constructed or substantially renovated homes purchased or constructed as a place of primary residence. The enhanced rebates apply where the HST becomes payable on or after April 1, 2012 and before April 1, 2013. Eligible purchasers of such homes purchased for a purchase price of up to $850,000 will be entitled to receive a rebate of 71.43% of the 7% provincial component of the HST paid, up to a maximum of $42,500. This is 5 of the 7% provincial component of the HST. The maximum rebate for homes valued at $850,000 or above is $42,500. This enhanced rebate represents a 60% increase in the maximum rebate currently available.

In March 2012, it was announced that British Columbia would provide grants to purchasers of new residential housing that is purchased for use as a secondary or recreational residence. Unlike the enhanced rebates above, British Columbia will provide a grant to purchasers of new residential housing purchased for use as a secondary or recreational residence. The applicable period of April 1, 2012 to before April 1, 2013 is the same. The grant will only be available in a qualifying area of the Province (outside the Capital Regional District and the Greater Vancouver Regional District).

2. Québec

On September 30, 2011, the Québec government announced its agreement with the federal government to more fully harmonize its Québec sales tax ("QST") with the GST/HST. Although the QST is imposed under its own provincial statute and is administered by the Agence du revenu du Québec, the QST has been largely harmonized from the introduction of the GST in the early 1990s. Nonetheless, a few key differences that continued to exist are to be resolved from January 1, 2013.

In particular, QST will be calculated on the selling price of property (and services) without the GST. (QST is currently calculated on the value of the consideration plus the 5% GST.) To correct for the reduced revenues on eliminating the GST from the tax base, the QST rate will be further increased to 9.975% on January 1, 2013.

In addition, there is to be a phase out of the current complete restriction on "large businesses" claiming input tax refunds on: (a) certain road vehicles; (b) electricity, natural gas, fuel and steam; (c) certain telecommunications services; and (d) meals and entertainment. This is to occur over a three year period starting in 2018, thereby bringing to an end a measure that was intended to be "temporary" when first introduced.

Finally, like the other HST Provinces, the Québec government will waive its constitutional exemption on an interim basis and begin paying the GST, which it will be entitled to fully recover by way of a rebate mechanism.

3. Prince Edward Island

On April 18, 2012, it was announced that Prince Edward Island would join the HST regime with a combined HST rate of 14%. This will replace the GST currently levied at 5% rate under the Act, and the revenue tax, a provincial consumption and use tax, which is levied at 10% on the GST-included value of a supply. As in the other HST provinces, the HST in Prince Edward Island will administered by the Canada Revenue Agency.

4. Nova Scotia

On April 2, 2012, it was announced that the HST rate in Nova Scotia would be reduced from the current 15% rate to 14% in 2014, and then to 13% in 2015.


There have been a half dozen cases of interest in the past year or so with respect to the GST/HST and real property. In what follows, we consider each of these in turn.

1. Undue Delay in Issuing Invoice

In Lacroix v R, [2011] GSTC 62, the Federal Court of Appeal (the "FCA") considered an assessment by the Minister on the basis that there had been "undue delay" by the Appellant in issuing an invoice for services under a contract for the building of a golf course. The Tax Court of Canada (the "TCC") had held that that the Minister's assessment had been invalid as the work had not been "substantially completed".

Subsection 168(1) of the Act provides that GST/HST in respect of a taxable supply is payable on the earlier of the day the consideration for the supply is paid and the day the consideration for the supply "becomes due". In that respect, subsection 152(1) of the Act specifies that the consideration "shall be deemed to become due" on the earliest of three dates:

  • the day the supplier first issues an invoice or the invoice's date;
  • the "day the supplier would have, but for undue delay, issued an invoice in respect of the supply for that consideration" [underlining added];
  • the day the recipient is required to pay that consideration to the supplier pursuant to an agreement in writing.

However, paragraph 168(3)(c) of the Act sets out a rule whereby GST/HST is payable when, under an agreement in writing for the construction, renovation or alteration of, or repair to any real property "the construction, renovation, alteration or repair is substantially completed".

By the time the Appellant stopped work on the golf course, due to an illness on the part of one of the principals of the recipient of the services, the work had been 55% completed. There had been no written agreement for the services and no invoice had been issued. To protect its right to be paid, the Appellant registered a "legal hypothec" on the property, which is akin to a construction lien in common law provinces under Quebec's Civil Code).

The FCA held that the TCC could not conclude the analysis by determining that the work had not been substantially completed, because it was not apparent to the FCA that paragraph 168(3)(c) applied given that the express wording of that provision requires "an agreement in writing". The FCA held that the TCC, therefore, had to determine whether, according to the evidence, an invoice had to be issued for the purpose of paragraph 152(1)(b) of the Act for the part of the work that had been carried out.

The FCA concluded that there had been "undue delay" in the Appellant issuing an invoice based on the evidence. First, the FCA accepted the Minister's position that the contractual relationship ended between the halting of the work and the filing of the hypothec. The FCA held:

Logically, an invoice for the outstanding amount had to be issued before the motion for forced surrender and for taking in payment was filed. In fact, this motion could not be filed before a request for payment was made in some form or other. In this context, the failure to issue an invoice cannot be justified.

This is the first case in which the FCA has considered the meaning of "undue delay". It is worth considering the context of any significant delay in the issuance of an invoice in an on-going construction contract.

2. GST Transitional Rebate

In Henderson v R, [2011] GSTC 4, the TCC considered the transitional GST rebate under its Informal Procedure in respect of an Appellant that wished to acquire a new, yet to be constructed, house. The Appellant entered into a construction contract for the building of a home on a particular lot. There was a term of the contract in the payment schedule which provided that the Appellant was to pay "$132,500 plus purchase lot by June 28, 2007". The Appellant paid the amount to the contractor and title to the lot was transferred from the registered owner (a party different than the contractor) to the Appellant in August 2007. Construction of the home took place in 2007 and 2008 and the Appellant took possession in 2008.

The Appellant applied for the GST transitional rebate pursuant to subsection 256.74(5) of the Act. The rebate is for 1% where GST was paid at 6% on a residential purchase that closed on or after January 1, 2008, the date on which the GST rate went from 6% to 5%. The provision requires the agreement of purchase and sale to have been signed before October 31, 2007, that is, prior to the announced reduction in the GST rate. The policy behind the rebate was to provide the rebate to the consumer, since industry practice is to price new homes on a GST-included basis.

The TCC held that the Appellant failed to meet two conditions in section 256.74. First, the contract between the Appellant and the contractor was not a contract for the purchase of a house. It was a contract for the construction of a house on a lot which the contractor also sold to the Appellant before the start of construction. Second, the Appellant acquired ownership to the lot and part of the construction in 2007, not 2008. As a result the requirement that ownership and possession of the residential complex be transferred after 2007 were not met.

The legal difference between buying a newly constructed home vs. buying a lot and entering into a contract with the vendor to build a new home resulted in the 1% GST rebate being unavailable to the Appellant.

In a further Informal Procedure appeal, in Lavigne v R, [2011] GSTC 122, the TCC once again considered the application of section 256.74 of the Act. In this case, the Minister had denied the rebate on the basis the Appellant took possession of her condominium unit before January 1, 2008.

The wording at issue was in paragraph 256.74(5)(a) which requires that there be a sale of a residential complex "in respect of which ownership and possession under the agreement are transferred to the particular individual on or after January 1, 2008".

The Appellant had moved into the newly completed condominium in November 2007 as the unit was substantially completed and liveable. However, it was not until March 2008 that the Appellant signed a notarized contract of sale and purchase of the condominium and paid the purchase price. Under this contract, the Appellant became the owner on the date of that contract with immediate possession and occupation. The Appellant argued that she had moved into the condominium only as a tenant with permission of the contractor on the condition that she pay for electricity, and that she therefore had neither ownership or possession within the meaning of the Act.

The TCC noted that the Act does not define either "possession" or "ownership". Notwithstanding that the condominium was in Quebec, the TCC held that the term "possession" must be given its common-law meaning and, as a consequence, mean something different from "ownership". Specifically, in this context it should mean "occupation" or "detention". Accordingly, the appeal was denied.

3. Rental Property and New Housing Rebate

In Wotherspoon v R, [2011] GSTC 108 (TCC), the Appellant purchased a condominium for his personal use as a residence and paid GST in 2007. The vendors were GST registered and had previously purchased the condominium as an investment property to rent out on a short term basis. The vendors had claimed input tax credits on the purchase and collected GST on the rental income.

The Appellant claimed and received the New Housing Rebate. The Appellant then claimed a rebate for tax paid in error in respect of the remaining GST paid to the vendors on the basis that this was a GST-exempt supply of a used "residential complex". The Minister denied this second rebate for tax paid in error.

The TCC held that the condominium did not comply with the definition of "residential complex" set out in subsection 123(1) of the Act because all, or substantially all, of the use by the vendors was as a rental property for periods of time of less than the 60 days as referred to in the postamble to the definition, which provides:

but does not include a building, or that part of a building, that is a hotel, a motel, an inn, a boarding house, a lodging house or other similar premises, or the land and appurtenances attributable to the building or part, where the building is not described in paragraph (c) and all or substantially all of the leases, licences or similar arrangements, under which residential units in the building or part are supplied, provide, or are expected to provide, for periods of continuous possession or use of less than sixty days.

According to the evidence, the rental periods were of a short duration, generally seven to ten days. Accordingly, the appeal was denied.

4. Primarily as a Place of Residence

In Coates v R, [2011] GSTC 21, the Appellant was an employee of a construction company, who had personally built three houses, moved into each in turn and then sold each thereafter. He went on to build the home that he currently resides in. All four houses are on the same street. The Appellant was not GST/HST registered. The Appellant testified that he built the third house, which was the subject of the appeal, for the sole purpose of occupying it as his home. When he built the house, he had two children and a third child arrived after the house was completed. His testimony was that his employment was intermittent and that he had difficulty paying interest and other borrowing costs on personal debt and meeting other living expenses. He used the proceeds from the sale that took place six months later to repay debt, finance the purchase of the land on which he built his current home, and to pay personal living expenses.

The TCC held that the pattern adopted by the Appellant showed that the Appellant built the third home with, at least, the secondary intention of selling it, as he had done with the previous two properties. On this basis, the TCC concluded that the Appellant had constructed the third home in the course of an adventure or concern in the nature of trade. Accordingly, although the Appellant was an individual, he was considered to be a "builder" within the meaning of the Act.

As a builder, the Appellant was required to self-assess for HST on the fair market value of the home on the substantial completion of the construction or on moving in pursuant to subsection 191(1) of the Act. At issue in the appeal was whether an exception for personal use would apply to exempt the Appellant from this requirement. The exemption at subsection 191(5) of the Act is as follows:

Subsections (1) to (4) do not apply to a builder of a residential complex or an addition to a residential complex where

  1. the builder is an individual;
  2. at any time after the construction or renovation of the complex or addition is substantially completed, the complex is used primarily as a place of residence for the individual ...
  3. the complex is not used primarily for any other purpose between the time the construction or renovation is substantially completed and that time; and
  4. the individual has not claimed an input tax credit in respect of the acquisition of or an improvement to the complex [underlining added].

The TCC held that the wording of subsection 191(5) of the Act:

requires that the property actually be used first by the individual (who is a builder as defined) as a place of residence. That involves a simple factual determination as to whether or not the property was used as a family home after it was substantially completed. A secondary intention to resell the property at a later date is irrelevant to the determination as to whether or not the exception applies.

By definition, an individual is a builder only if the property was built in the course of a business or an adventure in the nature of trade. If the home was constructed by the individual purely for personal reasons, the "self-supply" rule does not apply in the first instance. The exception only comes into play after an individual has been found to be a builder. Therefore, the exception cannot be interpreted as requiring that the property have been built only for purely personal reasons. This means that an individual can benefit from the exception even if he has the secondary intention, at the time of its construction, of reselling the property, provided he actually uses it as a place of residence after the construction is completed.

Applying this reasoning to the evidence, the TCC noted that the Appellant and his family had lived in the home for almost two years after completion, there is no evidence to show that the Appellant listed the home for sale after it was substantially completed or showed it to prospective buyers, did not hold it as stock-in-trade and the use of the property was only changed later on when the Appellant ran out of money and needed to sell the home to meet his family's living expenses.

On this basis, the TCC concluded that the exception in subsection 191(5) applied. The TCC did not refer to a line of case law, including the decision of the FCA in Lacina v R, [1997] GSTC 69, in which the FCA held that "the word 'primarily' refers to a personal intention to live there permanently and not to use the property as stock-in-trade or, in other words, as a disposable asset". It is difficult to reconcile this decision with the earlier case law.

5. Place of Residence

Finally, in Daruwala v. R, [2012] GSTC 69, the Appellant purchased a new home from a builder and paid the GST. When the Appellant first viewed the home, it appeared to him that it had been lived in, as there was some furniture, and there was some garbage in the kitchen. He raised his concerns about GST being payable on a used home, but he was told by the builder that the tax had to be paid. After taking possession the Appellant noticed burn damage on the roof of the oven. Mail for the builder and the principal's family was received at the home.

The Appellants filed for a rebate of the GST on the basis that the home had previously been occupied.

The TCC considered whether the self-supply rule in subsection 191(1) applied on the basis that the builder had given "possession or use ... under a lease, license or similar arrangement .... entered into for the purpose of its occupancy by an individual as a place of residence". Although the arrangement between the builder and its principal was informal, the TCC concluded there had been a "lease, license or similar arrangement" for the principal to use the home.

The TCC went on to consider whether the home was being used as a "place of residence", even temporarily. The TCC did not find the testimony of the principal to be sufficiently detailed or cogent to be persuasive. The TCC held that in the absence of reliable evidence as to the purpose for which the home was to be occupied, it concluded that the principal intended to use the home as his home for at least several months, which was sufficient to satisfy the requirements of subsection 191(1).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
8 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

The prospect of an internal investigation raises many thorny issues. This presentation will canvass some of the potential triggering events, and discuss how to structure an investigation, retain forensic assistance and manage the inevitable ethical issues that will arise.

22 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

From the boardroom to the shop floor, effective organizations recognize the value of having a diverse workplace. This presentation will explore effective strategies to promote diversity, defeat bias and encourage a broader community outlook.

7 Dec 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

Staying local but going global presents its challenges. Gowling WLG lawyers offer an international roundtable on doing business in the U.K., France, Germany, China and Russia. This three-hour session will videoconference in lawyers from around the world to discuss business and intellectual property hurdles.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.