Canada: Do You Qualify For IRS’s New Streamlined Procedure To Bring US Tax Returns Current?

Last Updated: September 10 2012
Article by Roy Berg and James Gifford Esq

If you are a US person residing in Canada and are one of the unfortunate few who does not have a graduate degree in US tax and who is not related to a cross-border US tax professional you may have missed filing one of the myriad of tax forms that are required every year (the failure to file of which can carry dire penalties). If this is the case, the IRS may have a new streamlined procedure just for you. The bad news is that few will likely qualify and those who do not qualify face serious consequences just for applying.

The new streamlined procedure went into effect on September 1, 2012. Click here to see the full text of the streamlined procedure. The program is designed for expats with simple returns and little or no tax due. But whether by design or defect, it threatens to entrap most of its likely applicants. For those who qualify, the new program may be a breeze. But for those who do not, and we suspect most expats will not, the streamlined procedure is a lot like a lobster pot - easy to get into, hard to live in, and harder to escape.1


For those who qualify the procedure is remarkably humane:

  1. File all tax returns with appropriate related information returns (e.g. Form 3520, 3520-A, 5471, etc.) required for the past three years (2009, 2010, and 2011);
  2. File Foreign Bank Account Reports (Form TD F 90-22.1, or "FBAR") for the past six years;
  3. Pay any tax and interest if applicable on the unfiled returns; and
  4. Complete and sign under penalties of perjury a 20-question questionnaire (you will find the full text of the questionnaire by clicking here).

For those who qualify, the IRS will not impose penalties nor conduct an audit. In addition the IRS will provide retroactive relief to defer income accrued inside Canadian registered retirement savings plans ("RRSP") and registered retirement income funds ("RRIF")2 where the taxpayer failed to timely file Form 8891.


Qualification for the streamlined procedure involves a two part analysis: 1) Eligibility; and 2) Risk Factors.

"Eligibility" for streamlined procedure

The taxpayer is "eligible" for the streamlined procedure if he meets all of the following factors:

  1. The taxpayer has not resided in the US since December 31, 2008;
  2. The taxpayer has not filed a US tax return since 2008;
  3. The taxpayer does not owe more than $1,499 in any of the tax years beginning in 2009 and ending on 2011;
  4. The taxpayer is not submitting an amended return for any of the three years, except to file a late election to defer tax in a Canadian RRSP or Canadian RRIF;
  5. The taxpayer has a valid social security number or taxpayer identification number ("TIN"), or applies for a TIN as part of a submission to the program.

Even if the taxpayer satisfies the foregoing, he will only be eligible to participate in the streamlined procedure if he presents "low compliance risk." Those who do not present "low compliance risk" will not be eligible to participate and may be subject to full examination and penalties, including criminal prosecution. The description of the procedure states in part:

Submissions that present higher compliance risk are not eligible for the streamlined processing procedures and will be subject to a more thorough review and possibly a full examination, which in some cases may include more than three years, in a manner similar to opting out of the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program.

Worse, the IRS will have all of the information the taxpayer submitted under the streamlined procedure and that person becomes ineligible for the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program.

"Risk Factors"

Based on the questionnaire the taxpayer is required to complete, (the IRS will determine whether the taxpayer is considered "low compliance risk"). According to the IRS, the taxpayer's risk level may rise if any of the following are present:

  1. Any of the returns submitted through this program claim a refund;
  2. There is material economic activity in the US;
  3. The taxpayer has not declared all of his/her income in his/her country of residence;
  4. The taxpayer is under audit or investigation by the IRS;
  5. FBAR penalties have been previously assessed against the taxpayer or if the taxpayer has previously received an FBAR warning letter;
  6. The taxpayer has a financial interest or authority over a financial account(s) located outside his/her country of residence;
  7. The taxpayer has a financial interest in an entity or entities located outside his/her country of residence;
  8. There is US source income; or
  9. There are indications of sophisticated tax planning or avoidance.

Unfortunately the IRS has not given guidance as to which of the above-listed risk factors or combination thereof, will increase the taxpayer's compliance risk, and therefore disqualify him from the streamlined procedure. Further, the questionnaire raises a number of extremely serious issues of which every taxpayer considering this procedure should be aware.


The questionnaire is divided into four categories: eligibility for the program; interests in financial accounts and other entities; relationship with tax advisors; and the taxpayer's current tax position.


The first four questions are basic eligibility questions. Presumably, a "Yes" answer to any of them means disqualification from the program.

Question 1: Have you resided in the US for any period of time since January 1, 2009?

It is unclear what is meant by "reside." Does this include temporary residence in a US vacation home? Alternatively, is residence determined under a standard akin to the "substantial presence" test set forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.7701(b) – 1(c)(1), or possibly the test set forth in Article IV of the Treaty?3

Question 2: Have you filed a US tax return for tax year 2009 or later?

Apparently the filing of a tax return for 2009 or later will disqualify the taxpayer from participation in the streamlined procedure. For example, if a taxpayer filed a 1040 tax return in 2009 but failed to file the related information returns or FBAR, such taxpayer may not be eligible to participate in the streamlined procedures.

Question 3: Do you owe more than $1,500 in US tax on any of the tax returns you are submitting through this program?

The IRS initially set the threshold at $1,000. See the document "Options Available to Help Taxpayers with Offshore Interests" (modified on September 3, 2012 to reflect the new threshold).

Further, it is unclear whether the $1,500 threshold is doubled to $3,000 if the taxpayer is filing a joint return with his or her spouse.

Question 4: If you are submitting an amended return (Form 1040X) solely for the purpose of requesting a retroactive deferral of income on Form 8891, are there any adjustments reported on the amended return to income, deductions, credits or tax?

This section strikes us as unnecessarily punitive because it allows an amended tax return only for late deferral elections of Canadian RRSPs or RRIFs, but not for other types of retirement plans or accounts. That is because other retirement plans or accounts require the filing of Form 8833 to defer income, and not Form 8891. Deferral of income accrued inside of a retirement plan (including RRSPs and RRIFs) is provided under Article XVIII paragraph 7 of the Treaty. The fact that the taxpayer is a beneficiary or participant in a retirement plan that is not an RRSP or RRIF and wishes to elect income deferral under the same Treaty provision available for RRSPs and RRIFs, such taxpayer would be ineligible to file an amended tax return with Form 8833 under the streamlined procedure. Further, if the taxpayer inadvertently omitted income from a Canadian Tax Free Savings Account ("TFSA") on a past return4, he is unable to declare that income on an amended return and still participate in this new program.

Financial Accounts/Entities

This section comprises three questions regarding the taxpayer's financial interests.

Question 5: Since January 1, 2006, have you had a financial interest in or signature or other authority over any financial accounts located outside your country of residence? If yes, are the accounts held in your name? If yes, list the countries where the accounts were/are held.

Reading the question literally, the taxpayer could face disqualification for maintaining a bank or securities account located in the US or having signature authority over such accounts located in the US (for an elderly parent for example).

Question 6: Since January 1, 2006, did you have a financial interest in any entities located outside your country of residence? If yes, do these entities control U.S. investments? If yes, list the countries where the entities were/are located.

It is unclear what the IRS means by using the terms "financial interest" and "entities." Taken literally all portfolio investments in US companies would constitute a financial interest in an entity. If so, then holding US stocks, either directly or indirectly (e.g., through a Canadian mutual fund), could make a taxpayer "high risk." This would also be the result if the taxpayer indirectly held US stocks in an RRSP, RRIF, or other pension or retirement plan or fund.

Further, it is unclear how to answer this question if the taxpayer owns a Canadian company that has foreign subsidiaries.

Question 7: Do you have a retirement account located in your country of residence? If yes, are earnings from the retirement account non-taxable in the US under current treaty provisions? If yes, is the retirement account located in Canada and are you filing a delinquent Form 8891 for each year?

Merely having a foreign retirement plan should not disqualify a taxpayer. Indeed, the streamlined procedure acknowledges that many taxpayers have Canadian RRSPs and RRIFs.

The reason for this question is hazy, though perhaps the purpose is to determine which taxpayers have retirement plans other than RRSPs and RRIFs. In addition, Form 8833 and not Form 8891 must be filed to defer accrued income under the Treaty for retirement accounts other than RRSPs and RRIFs. Question 7 does not appear to address this fact.

Tax Advisors

In this section the IRS inquires about communications between the taxpayer and his tax advisor and whether the taxpayer relied upon such advice.

Question 8: Did you rely on the advice of a tax professional for not filing required US tax returns? If yes, is your tax advisor located in the US?

A "Yes" answer to the first question is the basis for the "reliance on experts" element of a "reasonable cause" defense against failure-to-file penalties.

It is unclear what the IRS means by the terms "tax professional" and "tax advisor" since the questionnaire uses both terms, presumably the terms have different meanings. Does it mean only those registered with the IRS (i.e., Federally Authorized Practitioners under 26 U.S.C. 7525(a)(3), with valid Preparer Tax Identification Numbers ("PTINs")) or does it mean anyone who, legally or not, gives tax advice?

In Canada, for example, lawyers, Chartered Accountants, Certified Management Accountants, Certified General Accountants, as well as non-accredited professionals who prepare tax returns often give tax advice. Do such individuals constitute tax advisors or tax professionals?

Question 9: During the above-listed tax years for this submission did you know that you were a US citizen or resident alien? If yes, did you disclose to your tax professional that you were a US citizen or resident alien?

We are concerned about how this question affects privileged communications. Limited privilege of taxpayer communications from disclosure is specifically provided by statute (26 U.S.C. 7525) for Federally Authorized Practitioners. Although the privilege is not absolute because the taxpayer must assert it and the IRS must consent, there is a risk that answering question 9, whether yes or no, could waive privilege under LRG 57(16)662.72.

In addition by answering this question, either in the affirmative or negative there is a risk that attorney-client privilege may be waived.

Question 10: During the above-listed tax years for this submission, have you declared all of your income in your country of residence?

In Canada, for example, certain items are excluded from gross income (e.g., capital dividends, lottery winnings, life insurance proceeds, income accrued inside a TFSA, etc.) and are never reported on the taxpayer's TI (Canada's general income tax return), even though such items may be taxable in the US.

So if a taxpayer does not report income on a T1 that isn't required to be reported, has he "declared" all of his income to Canada?

Question 11: If you used a tax professional, did you disclose the existence of the accounts/entities you hold outside your country of residence to your tax professional?

Just as in question 9, the answer to this question, either in the affirmative or the negative, could result in a waiver of the tax preparer-privilege or even the attorney-client privilege.

Question 12: Did you know you had a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR), Form TD F 90-22.1, filing requirement when you failed to file an FBAR?

The answer to this question can be very dangerous. The willful failure to file an FBAR can result in substantial civil (31 U.S.C. 5321(a)(5)) and criminal penalties. 31.U.S.C. 5322(a), 5322(b), and 18 U.S.C. 1001. Thus answering "Yes" may be an admission of guilt.

On the other hand, answering "No" calls for extreme caution as well. The questionnaire must be signed under penalty of perjury and so the answer must be truthful. Therefore, falsely answering this question "No" could result in a criminal perjury charge (26 U.S.C. 7206(1)).

The media attention to this issue makes it harder to claim ignorance of the law, though the specific wording of this question may permit a taxpayer who knew of the general obligation to file an FBAR, but believed the obligation didn't apply to him, to truthfully answer "No."

It is unclear whether a taxpayer could invoke the 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination and refuse to answer this question and, if doing so, would disqualify the taxpayer from the streamlined procedure. If invoking the 5th Amendment does result in disqualification, is that not tantamount to a presumption of guilt (or at least culpability) which is antithetical to the 5th Amendment?

Unlike OVDP, the new streamlined procedure does not grant immunity from criminal prosecution. Participation in the program may make some taxpayers face the Morton's fork of choosing between perjury and self-incrimination.5 In which case, not participating is advisable.

Tax Position

This last section asks seven questions about filing history and other matters.

Question 13: Have you ever filed a US tax return?

It is not clear how a past tax return filing affects compliance risk under the streamlined procedure. For example, what if a taxpayer previously filed US tax returns before moving to Canada decades ago and has not filed since? Is such taxpayer considered high risk.

Question 14: Are you currently under audit or investigation by the IRS?

The written instructions make clear that individuals who are under audit or investigation by the IRS are not eligible for the streamlined procedure.

This question is troubling because, unlike OVDI and OVDP, there is no mechanism by which the taxpayer can request "pre-clearance" by the IRS before deciding to participate in the procedure. Thus, the taxpayer could innocently attempt to enter into the program only to learn, when it is too late, that he is disqualified from participation in the streamlined procedures and unable to enter into the OVDP.

Question 15: Have you ever filed an FBAR?

Prior filing of an FBAR might be grounds for disqualification from the new procedure.

This is troubling because the FBAR filing requirements have been in existence since 1970. It is strange that someone who complied with the law in the past faces a harsher result than someone who never did.

Question 16: Have you received an FBAR warning letter for any of the above-listed tax years for failing to file an FBAR?

If you have received an FBAR warning letter you are not eligible for the streamlined procedure.

Question 17: Do you have a treaty-based position for your country of residence that reduces your US tax liability?

This question is especially troubling because many US persons residing in a country that has a treaty with the US will have treaty-based positions that reduce his US tax liability.

For example US persons residing in Canada frequently enjoy reduced US tax liability because of the Treaty's treatment of: dividends, interest, gains from the sale of stock, Social Security payments, Canada Pension Plan payments, and retirement plan payments (and accrued income and contributions).

Further, Article IV of the Treaty addresses "residency" of the taxpayer for tax purposes. If a taxpayer relies on the residency tie breaker rules under Article IV of the Treaty for residency determination, could he be disqualified?

Why the existence of a treaty between the expat's adopted country of residence and the US, and the concomitant applicability of that treaty to the taxpayer matters is hard to say.

Question 18: Were you employed by a US company or entity during any of the above-listed tax years?

This question appears to address the risk factor in the instructions that may increase the taxpayer's risk level (and therefore qualification for the streamlined procedure) if "there is US source income."

This question is not clear if such employment is direct, indirect, or where the employment services or duties are physically performed.

This question does not address the situation where an individual was employed by a non-US company with operations in the US, or if the individual was employed by a foreign subsidiary of a US parent company.

Question 19: During any of the above-listed years, did you receive income from any of the following income sources in your country of residence: rental income, sales of property, inheritance?

This question is really tough on taxpayers because many people who live abroad will eventually have income from the sale of property (e.g., sale of a home, sale of marketable securities) in his country of residence. And yet it is Americans who have long called a foreign country home who are most in need of this program.

Oddly, the question includes "inheritance" with "income." That is not the way inheritances usually work in the US and Canadian tax systems - they are not income to the beneficiary of the decedent's estate.

Question 20: Are you claiming a refund on any returns you are submitting through this program?

This is another troubling question. Sometimes more tax is withheld than is actually owed, which entitles the individual to a refund. For whatever reason, if more tax has been paid than is ultimately owed, the taxpayer is entitled to a refund. It seems unfair to disqualify these individuals from the streamlined procedure just because they wish to get their money back.

Even taxpayers who are not claiming refunds of withholding tax may be eligible for a refund. Under the Obama administration's economic stimulus program6 many expats received, or should have received, stimulus payments of $400 during 2009 and 2010.7 And expats who normally owed no US tax because of the foreign-earned income exclusion and other provisions might still be entitled to a stimulus payment. Taxpayers who may otherwise be low compliance risk may be forced to forego their stimulus payments in order to participate in the streamlined program.


The streamlined procedure is certainly a step in the right direction and is tacit acknowledgement that many "minnows" have been ensnared by the broadly cast net designed for bigger fish. However there is great uncertainty as to who will qualify for the procedure and the questions asked in the questionnaire pose serious risks to the uninformed taxpayer. Further, the IRS has retained the right to be the arbiter of qualification standards and risk assessment, which results in great uncertainty to applicants. If the procedure were properly tailored for these hapless minnows it would contain greater degree of certainty and not require the taxpayer to engage counsel to assess "risk level" before entering into the program. Until the IRS clarifies these issues, however, it appears they have missed the mark.


1. For the astute reader, this is a tortured paraphrase of a clever phrase from Bittker & Eustice's seminal treatise on corporate tax law.

2. Income deferral on foreign retirement accounts is allowed under many US income tax treaties. But only if the taxpayer makes a timely election. This new procedure allows taxpayers to make a late income deferral election.

3. The Convention Between Canada and the United States of America with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital, signed at Washington, DC, on September 26, 1980, as amended by the protocols signed on June 14, 1983, March 2, 1984, March 17, 1995, July 29, 1997, and September 21, 2007 (herein referred to as the "Treaty").

4. Notwithstanding that income accrued inside of a TFSA is tax-free for Canadian tax purposes, such is not the case for US tax purposes.

5. A Morton's Fork is a situation involving choice between two equally undesirable outcomes and is eponymous of John Morton (c. 1420-1500), archbishop of Canterbury, who was tax collector for the English King Henry VII. To him is attributed Morton's Fork, a neat argument for collecting taxes from everyone: those living in luxury obviously had money to spare and those living frugally must have accumulated savings to be able to pay.

6. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

7. The Making Work Pay provision (26 U.S.C. 36A) provided a refundable tax credit of up to $400 ($800 for married individuals filing jointly).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Roy Berg
Events from this Firm
2 Nov 2016, Webinar, Calgary, Canada

The new subsection 55(2) regime has now been enacted into law. With these new rules, the ability to pay tax-free dividends amongst related Canadian corporations, once a foundational concept of the Canadian tax system, can no longer be taken for granted for dividends received after April 20, 2015.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.