A bicycle is a vehicle under the Ontario Highway Traffic Act
(HTA). This means that a cyclist has the same rights and
responsibilities to obey all traffic laws as other road users.
Cyclists charged for disobeying traffic laws will be subject to a
minimum set fine and a Victim Surcharge fine of $20.00 for most
offences. In addition, in Ontario, a minor is also required to wear
an approved bicycle helmet when travelling on any public road. The
Ontario helmet law came into effect October 1, 1995. Although
originally intended to apply to all ages, it was amended by
Regulation before enactment to exempt adults (18 years of age and
over). The law was clearly created to target and protect children
from head injuries. Indeed, about three-quarters of all cycling
fatalities involve head injuries.
Has the helmet law been effective?
Statistics following the helmet law continue to show that the
percentage of child cyclists admitted to hospital with head
injuries has decreased. These statistics suggest that helmets are
increasing safety and are effective in preventing head injuries.
Again, although adults are not required by law to wear a helmet
when cycling, wearing a helmet is strongly encouraged for the
cyclist's own safety.
What is the fine for not wearing a helmet?
The fine is $60. With court costs of $5 and the victim fine
surcharge of $10, the total is $75 for a plea of guilty.
How do I know which helmet to buy?
Consumers should look for a helmet that fits comfortably and
meets safety standards. Check the inside of the helmet for stickers
from one or more of the following organizations:
Canadian Standard Association: CAN/CSA D113.2-M89
Snell Memorial Foundation: Snell B90, Snell B90S, or Snell
American National Standard Institute: ANSI Z90.4-1984
American Society For Testing and Materials: ASTMF1447-94
British Standards Institute: BS6863:1989
Standards Association of Australia: AS2063.2-1990
More information on approved helmets can be found by consulting
the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and/or viewing their
As always, though this article intends to give you a basic
overview of the law, it is never a substitute for consulting your
lawyer. If you or someone you know was injured while cycling, you
are advised to discuss your legal options with a personal injury
It's not often that our little blog intersects with such titanic struggles as the U.S. presidential race – and by using the term "titanic" I certainly don't mean to suggest that anything disastrous is in the future.
J.J. v. C.C., is an interesting case in which the court held that an automotive garage owes a duty to minor children to secure the vehicles on the premises by locking the cars and safely storing the car keys...
In Irwin v. Alberta Veterinary Medical Association, 2015 ABCA 396, the Alberta Court of Appeal found that the "ABVMA" failed to afford procedural fairness to a veterinarian undergoing an incapacity assessment.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).