Canada: Motion To Amend Pleadings Granted; Motion For Bifurcation Denied (Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts Bulletin: Week of July 30, 2012)


Motion to Amend Pleadings Granted; Motion for Bifurcation Denied
Apotex Inc. v. H. Lundbeck A/S
Drug: escitalopram

The Court recently translated a decision from April regarding a motion to amend a statement of claim and a motion to bifurcate in an impeachment proceeding. The Court granted the motion to amend and denied the motion for bifurcation.

The proposed amendments sought to add a new party (the proposed supplier of Apotex' active pharmaceutical ingredient) to the claim. The Court held that it is in the interest of justice in ensuring efficient use of judicial resources and avoiding a multiplicity of pleadings and the risk of contradictory judgments that this amendment be permitted. The Court also held that there had been no delay in filing the motion to amend the pleadings; however, even if there had been, there was not any prejudice that could not be compensated in costs. The Court considered some of the procedural choices made by Apotex and held that a party, as sophisticated as Apotex, "must be taken to accept the possible consequences of the procedural choices it makes, and cannot be heard to complain that these consequences are prejudicial to it."

Regarding the bifurcation motion, Lundbeck undertook to forego its entitlement to damages and claim only Apotex and Pharmachem's profits, in the event that infringement is found; taking the risk that its entitlement to those profits could be successfully opposed. The Court held that had this concession not been made, there would have been justification for a bifurcation order.


Pleadings for Disgorgement of Profits and for an Accounting of Profits in s. 8 Damages Not Struck in Ontario Court
Apotex Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Company
Drug: atomoxetine

In this case, Apotex has claimed damages in Ontario Court pursuant to, inter alia, section 8 of the NOC Regulations. Lilly brought a motion to strike out parts of Apotex' statement of claim. The motion was mainly dismissed.

In the underlying proceeding, Lilly's application for prohibition was dismissed for mootness and not because Apotex' allegations of invalidity were found to be justified. Thus, Lilly argued in its motion to strike that section 8 does not apply in the circumstances. The Court held that it was not plain and obvious that the dismissal for mootness could not come within the ambit of section 8 of the NOC Regulations. Thus, it did not strike the claim.

Lilly also asserted in its motion that the claim should be struck as the material facts relating to the damages claim were not pled. However, the Court held that a basic pleading of damages was present and it was implicit in the pleadings that Apotex was ready to come to market. To require more than the basic pleading would require Apotex to plead evidence, which is contrary to the Rules. Lilly also tried to strike the pleadings regarding unjust enrichment and disgorgement of profits. However, the Court held that this claim had a reasonable chance of success and that it was not scandalous, frivolous or vexatious or an abuse of process. Thus, the claims were not struck.

Lilly moved to strike Apotex' claims pursuant to the Trade-marks Act. Apotex is asserting, inter alia, that in alleging in the NOC proceeding that the patent was properly listed on the Patent Register and that the patent would be infringed, Lilly made statements that were materially false and misleading and intended to discredit the business wares and services of a competitor. Furthermore, as a result of these alleged violations of the Trade-marks Act, Apotex alleges that Lilly made profits it would not otherwise have made and is claiming those profits. The Court held that whatever Lilly may have thought when listing the patent on the Patent Register, the subsequent determination that the patent was void ab initio means Lilly did not hold a patent and had no right to register it. Thus, there is a reasonable prospect that Lilly can be held to have made assertions which, by reason of the retroactive voiding of the patent, were false. Thus, the Court held that the claim has a reasonable prospect of success.

The Court also held that absolute privilege applies for statements made in court proceedings; however, it is unclear whether that applies for listing a patent on the Patent Register. Thus, the relevant pleadings were not scandalous, frivolous or vexatious or an abuse of process and they were not struck. The Court also held that the question of whether starting the proceeding falls within absolute privilege or an exception to that absolute privilege is also something that should not be resolved by means of motion at this early stage of the litigation. Thus, the pleading was not struck.

The claim to damages or an accounting of profits as may be otherwise available at law was struck as it had no supporting allegations of fact.

Other Cases of Interest

Second Judicial Review of Maintenance Fee Payments for Wrong Patent
Repligen Corporation v. The Attorney General of Canada

This is a second judicial review commenced by Repligen for a second refusal by the Commissioner of Patents ("Commissioner") to correct errors made in maintenance fee payment documents. In the first judicial review application, the Court determined that the Commissioner did not consider relevant factors in determining whether to make the corrections pursuant to section 8 of the Patent Act.

The Commissioner made a redetermination of the issue and again refused to make the correction. In arranging for a service to pay required maintenance fees, the patent number was incorrectly provided. Maintenance fee payments were then made against the wrong patent, owned by Rolls-Royce PLC, and the Repligen patent lapsed. The Commissioner refused to correct the error, citing concerns that making the correction could negatively affect the rights of others. The first judicial review was commenced in respect of this refusal.

The Court in this second judicial review noted that the appropriate standard of review is correctness for the interpretation of section 8 of the Patent Act, and the application of the law of the facts involves a review based on reasonableness. The Court determined that the Commissioner should have taken into consideration that Repligen had paid the prescribed maintenance fees, although to the wrong patent. The Court considered that Repligen's interests were completely discounted by the Commissioner on the basis of a lack of due diligence. The Court indicated that the approach taken by the Commissioner requires a standard of perfection in terms of fee payments, which would render section 8 of the Patent Act unnecessary.

Accordingly, the Court submitted the matter to a different decision maker within the Patent Office, indicating that the Commissioner should take into account the interests of Repligen and Rolls-Royce, as both parties attempted to comply with maintenance fee provisions.

Other Industry News

Health Canada has published a Draft Guidance Document – Acetylsalicylic Acid Labelling Standard. Comments are due September 25, 2012.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions