Canada: Proposed OTC Central Counterparty Clearing Requirements Published By Canadian Securities Administrators

Last Updated: August 2 2012
Article by Priscilla P. Bunke and Courtney R. Burton


On June 20, 2012, the Canadian Securities Administrators ("CSA"), the voluntary umbrella organization of Canada's provincial and territorial securities regulators through its Derivatives Committee ("Committee"), published for public comment a further Consultation Paper 91406 Derivatives: OTC Central Counterparty Clearing ("CSA Paper 91‐406") following its initial Consultation Paper 91401 Over-the Counter Derivatives Regulation in Canada as part of its commitment to establish a comprehensive framework for over‐the‐counter derivatives regulation and to balance the need to meet international commitments with the needs of individual market participants in Canada. In CSA Paper 91‐406, the Committee aims to meet the commitment of G20 leaders made in Pittsburgh in September 2009 that all standardized over‐the‐counter ("OTC") derivatives contracts should be cleared through central counterparty ("CCP") by end 2012, at latest. The general intent of the proposed requirements related to CCP clearing as outlined in CSA Paper 91‐406 is that the introduction of requirements for CCP clearing of previously bilaterally cleared or un‐cleared derivatives transactions will enhance both the transparency of derivatives markets for regulators, and to serve to mitigate the overall risk involved with derivative transactions.

The purpose of CSA Paper 91‐406 is to outline the CSA proposals relating to the CCP clearing of OTC derivatives with the overall objective that the discussion contained therein will generate the commentary and debate necessary to regulators with respect to selecting appropriate policies and rules that will eventually be implemented in the various jurisdictions of Canada. The CSA stayed true to the pattern in its previously published consultation papers within the context of the proposed Canadian derivatives regulatory regime, to highlight its analysis of what it has considered in making its recommendations for a proposed requirement of regulating derivatives then laying out some recommendations on how it proposes to accomplish this, and concluding by posing specific questions to the public asking if its recommendations are appropriate and if other issues or alternatives should be considered1.

CSA Paper 91‐406 describes the Committee's proposals related to mandatory CCP clearing of OTC derivatives and discusses, among other things, the following:

  • issues of back‐loading pre‐existing transactions;
  • time frames for CCP clearing;
  • limited exemptions for intra‐group transactions;
  • recognition of CCPs;
  • FMI principles and risk management;
  • systems and technology;
  • protection of assets;
  • reporting; and,
  • issues related to foreign‐based CCPs and regulatory cooperation.

Mandatory CCP Clearing

The Committee proposes the mandatory clearing of all "eligible" OTC derivatives. In order to determine which derivatives are eligible for clearing by a CCP, the Committee suggests a twopronged approach: the "bottom‐up approach" and the "top‐down approach".

1. Bottom‐up Approach

The bottom‐up approach refers to a process whereby a CCP submits OTC products that it already clears, or proposes to clear, to market regulators who would determine whether the products in question are eligible for central clearing and should be subject to mandatory clearing.

2. Top‐Down Approach

The top‐down approach refers to the process whereby a market regulator conducts analysis of market data for the purpose of identifying derivatives or categories of derivatives that potentially should be subject to an obligation to be centrally cleared.

The Committee, in considering both the bottom‐up and the top‐down approaches, would take into account certain criteria/factors such as: standardization of the derivative; liquidity of the market; the availability of accurate pricing; the risk the derivative would bring to a CCP; the costs to the market participants and public commentary.

In proposing to use the bottom‐up and the top‐down approach on assessing the central clearing eligibility of OTC derivatives contracts, the Committee is borrowing the international approach particularly the European Union's ("EU") approach in its Proposed EU Regulation on OTC Derivatives.

In CSA Paper 91‐406, the Committee proposes that, should a CCP fail to accept a derivative for clearing that has been determined by the regulator to be subject to mandatory clearing, the market regulator will conduct further analysis and publish a report of its findings. The analysis may lead to the determination of minimum capital or margin requirements for the derivative that is bilaterally cleared, or other trading restrictions; the Committee does not propose that a CCP will be required to clear transactions should the CCP decline to clear based on its own risk analysis.

In addition to the two‐pronged approach described above, the Committee also proposes that market regulators maintain a register of those derivatives that which have been determined eligible for central clearing and subject to mandatory CCP clearing.

Backloading of PreExisting Transactions

The Committee takes the position that pre‐existing derivative transactions that are un‐cleared, or that were cleared bilaterally, may benefit from being "back‐loaded" in the CCP clearing process. Given the complexity of back‐loading, pre‐existing transactions should only be backloaded voluntarily; the Committee is cognisant that the costs of back‐loading must be weighed against the benefits. However, if such pre‐existing transactions become subject to novation or assignment (effectively making them new trades), they should be subject to the new applicable clearing obligation(s). The Committee further suggests that market regulators conduct reviews of trade repositories2 (once appropriately established) and other sources to determine whether additional back‐loading obligations are appropriate.

In this regard, though the Committee is considering a voluntary back‐loading of un‐cleared bilateral derivatives transactions, the Committee is still going further than what the EU and the United States require in the Proposed EU Regulation on OTC Derivatives and in the US Dodd Frank Act3, which requires only that un‐cleared derivatives be reported to a registered trade repository.

The Committee has requested certain comments from the public and interested stakeholders on the above proposals, as follows:

1. Do you consider that product characteristics of any OTC derivative asset classes make them eligible for CCP clearing based on the factors set out herein? If so, what asset classes would you exclude, and for what reasons?

2. For which asset classes do you consider CCP clearing is inappropriate or not currently feasible based on the factors described herein, and for what reasons?

3. What are the costs and risks involved in moving particular derivatives or classes of derivatives transactions to CCP clearing that regulators should consider in determining if a derivative should be subject to a CCP clearing requirement?

Time Frames for CCP Clearing

The Committee suggests that trades that are subject to mandatory clearing should be submitted to a recognized CCP no later than the close of business on the day of execution. The CCP should then be required to review such a submitted transaction in order to ensure that it complies with the CCP rules and does not present an inappropriate risk to the CCP. Communication of acceptance or rejection of the transaction should be provided to the submitting party following the analysis of the CCP and no later than the end of the CCP business day.

With respect to trades that are cleared voluntarily (i.e. trades that are not subject to a mandatory clearing requirements and are not executed on an approved trading venue), the Committee recommends that if they are submitted to the CCP promptly (i.e. prior to the end of the close of business on the day of execution), the CCP would be subject to the same requirement to accept or reject the transaction by the end of its business day.

Finally, the Committee proposes that those derivatives which are both subject to mandatory clearing and are traded on a recognized trading venue, be submitted to the CCP as soon as possible. It is the Committee's preference that the submission process would be fully automated.

The Committee has requested certain comments from the public and interested stakeholders on the above proposals, as follows:

4. Does a deferred submission, be it measured in minutes, hours or days, engender significant counterparty or other risks that would make the imposition of a strict timeframe for submission to a CCP, and the acceptance by the CCP necessary?

Intragroup Transactions

In very broad terms, intra‐group transactions are essentially transactions between two related affiliates or associated entities. Unlike proponents in both the United States and the EU, the Committee does not support a broad exemption for intra‐group transactions from the CCP clearing obligation. The Committee is concerned that such an exemption would result in a situation where some intra‐group transactions could result in increased risk to the market or to a third‐party.

The Committee has requested certain comments from interested stakeholders on the above proposals, as follows:

5. The Committee asks whether an exemption from mandatory CCP clearing for intra‐group transactions is appropriate, including a description of the risks that they could pose to the marketplace and the costs of migrating such transactions to a CCP.

Recognition of CCPs

The Committee proposes the market regulators provide for recognition and regulation of CCPs. In Canada currently, only Ontario and Quebec require the recognition, or exemption from recognition, of CCPs.

Though the Committee states in CSA paper 91‐406 that in Alberta, recognition or exemption from recognition is required, this is not yet the case. In Alberta the Securities Act has been amended to require recognition of a clearing agency, but these particular sections of the legislative bill have not yet been proclaimed and are not yet in effect4.

The Committee recognizes that such recognition (or exemption from recognition) is not limited to the CCP physical presence, as a CCP located in one province or in a foreign country can carry on business in other Canadian jurisdictions where it offers services to persons residing in a jurisdiction or registered to carry on business in that jurisdiction.

FMI Principles and Risk Management

The Committee suggests that prior to 2012 the global standard for CCP structure and oversight was contained in two papers: Core Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems5 and Recommendations for Central Counterparties6. Early in 2010 these standards were reviewed. This review resulted in a consultative report being issued in March 2011 and then, in April 2012, the final FMI principles were published.

The FMI principles describe the risks faced by financial market infrastructures ("FMI"), including CCPs. The FMI principles are intended as broad but flexible guidance for addressing risks and efficiencies in FMI and discuss aspects of risk mitigation to areas including, but not limited to: segregation and portability; tiered participation; general business risk; governance; fees; participant access; and CCP rules.

Generally, the Committee proposes to incorporate the FMI principles when developing requirements applicable to CCPs recognized in Canada. Specifically, the Committee proposes development and implementation of a robust risk management program, in accordance with FMI principles, which includes:

  • an effective, multi‐level contingency structure including liquidity analysis and member margining, a default waterfall, required contributions and further financial backstops and/or insurance;
  • a method of analysis for all relevant risks and appropriate risk management procedures;
  • appropriate risk limits on individual clearing members;
  • a method to inform regulator(s) as to when a clearing member is at risk of default and when any default procedures are triggered;
  • undertaking periodic testing and review of clearing systems;
  • maintenance and utilization of accurate pricing and valuation procedures;
  • maintenance and utilization of product approval procedures to ensure that new clearing products do not bring undue risk to the CCP and its members;
  • utilization of a chief risk officer who reports to the CCP board or directors or risk management committee;
  • certain subject risk management models;
  • a method to provide regulators with periodic reports relating to the risks applicable to the CCP (and a description of how the risks are managed); and
  • a method to provide regulators with financial reports relating to the CCP, including aggregate risk exposures.

The Committee has requested certain comments from the public and interested stakeholders on the above proposals, as follows:

6. Is it appropriate to ensure that Canadian market participants have meaningful input into operational decisions of a CCP operating in Canada?

7. Do the Committee's proposals relating to corporate governance of a CCP address potential issues relating to conflicts of interest that may arise in the operation of a CCP? If not, what other measures would address such conflicts of interest?

8. The Committee seeks public comment on the relevance of developing rules allowing for access to CCPs regardless of trading venue. Is this of concern in the Canadian marketplace at this time or in the future?

Systems and Technology

The Committee acknowledges National Instrument 21‐101 respecting Marketplace Operation and recommends that comparable regulations be developed for CCPs. The Committee proposes that a program of risk analysis and oversight be implemented in order to identify and minimize sources of operational risk, in particular systems and technology.

Protection of Assets

CSA Paper 91‐406 indicates that the mandatory clearing of OTC derivatives will require that certain market participants need to clear their OTC derivatives through intermediaries. The Committee, in its consultation paper 91‐404 Derivatives: Segregation and Portability in OTC Derivatives Clearing, propose that effective segregation and portability mechanisms at CCPs will help to ensure that indirect clearing is done in a manner that protects customer positions and collateral, and potentially improves CCPs resilience to a clearing member default.


In addition to proposed collection of information by trade repositories7, the Committee also proposes that each market regulator seek the legislative authority to require the CCP to transmit relevant information to the market regulator required for oversight purposes. Such information may include, but not be limited to: transaction level details; margin requirements; guarantee fund contributions; financial statements; risk modes; financial resources that must be available for a market stress situation; board decisions and reports; rule and procedural modifications; information regarding outsourcing arrangements and details or any emergency or disciplinary actions.

The Committee has requested certain comments from the public and interested stakeholders on the above proposals, as follows:

9. The Committee asks for comment on the type of information that a CCP should provide and that should be made publicly available.

Foreignbased CCPs and Regulatory Cooperation

The Committee suggests that the review and recognition (or exemption from recognition) of foreign‐based CCPs is a priority, as a majority of counterparties to derivatives trades entered into by Canadian participants are resident outside of Canada.

The Committee has requested further comments from the public and interested stakeholders on the above proposals, as follows:

10. Generally, the Committee has endeavoured to follow international recommendations in the development of the recommendations for Canada in this paper. Are there recommendations that are inappropriate for the Canadian market?

11. Are there changes to the existing regulatory framework that would be desirable to accommodate a move to CCP clearing?

12. Do you consider that any changes need to be made to Canadian law to facilitate the efficiency of OTC derivatives clearing, either through a domestic or a foreign CCP? If so, what changes and for what reasons?

CSA Next Steps and Seeking of Public Comments

The Committee encourages market participants and the public to submit comments addressing any issues or questions they have raised in CSA Paper 91‐406. The deadline for submitting comments is September 21, 2012. The Committee will consider the comments and finalize the rule‐making guidelines, and each province will then begin the rule‐making process. The Committee will also be releasing the remaining three consultation papers on Exchange and Platform Trading (OTC Derivatives); Registration (Derivatives); and Capital and Collateral (OTC Derivatives) in coming months.


We invite market participants and other stakeholders to discuss any comments and questions with us. If you need help in addressing the questions posed by the Committee or addressing the issues as it relates to your operations. We are also available to assist you if you wish to submit comments to the Committee regarding CSA Paper 91‐406.


1 Previously published consultation papers include: Canadian Securities Administrators Consultation Paper 91‐ 401 on Over‐the‐Counter Derivatives Regulation in Canada; Canadian Securities Administrators Consultation Paper 91‐402 on Derivatives: Trade Repositories; Canadian Securities Administrators Consultation Paper 91‐403 on Derivatives: Surveillance and Enforcement; Canadian Securities Administrators Consultation Paper 91‐404 on Derivatives: Segregation and Portability in OTC Derivatives Clearing; and Canadian Securities Consultation Paper 91‐405 on Derivatives: End‐User Exemption.

2 See CSA Consultation paper 91‐402 Derivatives‐Trade Repositories

3 The proposed EU Regulation envisages that when a trade repository is registered by ESMA for reporting a particular type of OTC derivative, all those derivatives previously entered into shall be reported to that repository within 120 days. (The draft text of this is still unclear.) Under the DoddFrank Act, un‐cleared derivatives existing at enactment generally must be reported to a registered trade repository or the relevant regulator, under rules that must be adopted by October 2011, within 30 days of the final rules or other time period specified in the rules.

4 and 5 Published by the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems and available at .

6 Published jointly by the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems and the International Organization of Securities commissions Technical Committee and available at

7 See CSA Consultation Paper 91‐402: Derivatives – Trade Repositories

About Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP (FMC)

FMC is one of Canada's leading business and litigation law firms with more than 500 lawyers in six full-service offices located in the country's key business centres. We focus on providing outstanding service and value to our clients, and we strive to excel as a workplace of choice for our people. Regardless of where you choose to do business in Canada, our strong team of professionals possess knowledge and expertise on regional, national and cross-border matters. FMC's well-earned reputation for consistently delivering the highest quality legal services and counsel to our clients is complemented by an ongoing commitment to diversity and inclusion to broaden our insight and perspective on our clients' needs. Visit:

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
23 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Dentons and SheEO are coming together for an evening of #radicalgenerosity on October 23, 2017. Meet Vicki Saunders, Founder of SheEO, and learn about how SheEO is changing the landscape for female entrepreneurs.

23 Oct 2018, Seminar, Montreal, Canada

Dentons is pleased to invite you to join us for a breakfast seminar as part of the Les Matinées Dentons series on issues relevant to you and your business.

24 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

If you build it, claims may come. Join the Dentons Construction group for breakfast and an informative discussion on current topics in construction law.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions