Canada: Copyright In Transition: Supreme Court Of Canada Rules On Five Copyright Appeals

Last Updated: July 18 2012
Article by Casey Chisick and Steven Kennedy

Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Canada issued much anticipated rulings on a series of cases concerning copyright royalties for downloading and streaming of various kinds of musical works over the Internet, classroom copying of literary and artistic works, and recorded music in soundtracks that accompany movies and TV shows.1 Following closely on the heels of June's passage of Bill C-11, the Copyright Modernization Act, these cases herald significant changes to Canada's copyright landscape this summer.

The full impact of the decisions on copyright stakeholders – rightsholders, distributors, consumers and the general public – will take some time to digest, as will the implications of those decisions on the interpretation of the Copyright Act in general. In the meantime, here is an initial overview of this week's developments.

1.  Downloading Is Not a "Communication to the Public"...

Entertainment Software Association v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada2was the first of three rulings of the Court on tariffs proposed by the Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada ("SOCAN") related to online communication of musical works. At issue was whether or not a tariff could apply to video games containing copyrighted musical works, when the games are sold online and downloaded over the Internet. The Copyright Board had agreed with SOCAN that, unlike games in physical formats sold in traditional retail outlets or by mail-order (the reproduction royalties for which are negotiated and concluded in advance of sales), transmitting games to customers over the Internet constitutes a "communication to the public by telecommunication" of the music they contain. As the "communication" right is separate from the reproduction rights protected by the Copyright Act (the "Act"), the downloads were therefore made subject to a copyright tariff in addition to the royalties already paid for the reproduction right.

In a 5-4 split, the Supreme Court disagreed with the Board and held that the principle of technological neutrality requires that the Copyright Act apply equally between traditional and more technologically advanced forms of the same media. Since there is no "practical difference" between buying hard copies of games in retail outlets and downloading purchased games from the Internet, the majority of the Court chose to interpret the Act "in a way that avoids imposing an additional layer of protection and fees based solely on the method of delivery of the work to the end user."

In the Court's view, the "communication" right under the Act has traditionally been associated with performance rights, and while streaming may be akin to "performance," downloading is not. In this case, the Court held that only one activity takes place: the downloading of a copy of a video game containing musical works. Contrary to many observers' understanding of the Court's previous decisions in Compo v. Blue Crest Music and Bishop v. Stevens, the Court suggested that a single activity – in this case, the delivery of a permanent copy of a video game containing copyrighted musical works – cannot violate two separate rights at the same time.

On that basis, the Court found that downloading the games did not amount to a "communication." As a result, a separate royalty could not apply to the downloaded games and the Court allowed ESA's appeal. This will require SOCAN to refund any royalties that it has collected from video game sites since the tariff was first certified in 2007.

2.  ... But Streaming Is

The second decision, Rogers Communications Inc. v. SOCAN,3 considered a tariff certified for the communication of downloads and streams by online music services. In view of the Court's decision in ESA, the download issue was moot; like video game downloads, music downloads are not "communications" and therefore do not implicate the communication right. Consequently, the only real question in this appeal was whether live streaming (as opposed to downloading) of content on-demand was a "communication to the public" that could attract a royalty.

In challenging the proposed tariff, the appellants had argued that streaming was a "point-to-point" communication of a discrete copy of single work and therefore a private transmission rather than one "to the public." Writing for the majority, Rothstein, J. disagreed and found that providing music for on-demand, online streaming must be viewed in its overall context rather than on a transmission-by-transmission basis. In this context, streaming is a series of repeated transmissions of a work to different customers. As a result, streaming engages the "communication to the public" right and could therefore be subject to SOCAN's proposed tariff.

3.  Online Music Previews Are Fair Dealing for the Purpose of Research

In the third decision, Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. Bell Canada,4 SOCAN appealed a Copyright Board decision that free, 30-second online "previews" of musical works were exempt from royalty tariffs. Both the Board and the Federal Court of Appeal had decided that, although streaming previews does engage the authors' "communication" right (which, given the decision in Rogers, is now perfectly clear), they fell within the "fair dealing" dealing exception to copyright infringement for purposes of research or private study. The Court dismissed SOCAN's appeal.

SOCAN had argued that "research", for the purposes of the Copyright Act, could not be defined so broadly as to include acts directed only at allowing consumers to identify particular items for purchase. The Court disagreed, holding that, on the "large and liberal interpretation" mandated by its decision in CCH Canadian v. Law Society of Upper Canada,5 "research" need not be for creative purposes only. The Court then determined that this research was "fair dealing" by applying the oft-cited factors from CCH (i.e., the purpose of the dealing, the character of the dealing, the quantity of the dealing, available alternatives to the dealing, the nature of the work and the effect of the dealing on the work), noting in particular that, on these facts, the "purpose" to be examined was that of the end user, not the copier, and that the relevant inquiry into "amount" was the amount of the work used in each individual dealing, not the aggregate amount of content used in the course of the system of dealing as a whole. The aggregate amount of dealing is to be considered as part of the "character of the dealing", not the amount.

After applying the CCH factors to the previews, the Court concluded that the Board correctly balanced the interests of creating and disseminating works with ensuring that creators are fairly rewarded and accordingly dismissed the appeal.

4.  Photocopies Made by Teachers for Students May Be Fair Dealing

The fourth decision was Alberta (Education) v. Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright).6 Access Copyright, a collective society that administers reproduction rights in literary and artistic works, applied to the Board for a tariff respecting photocopies made by elementary and secondary school teachers. At issue was whether these copies, which the Board found are distributed to students as complements to textbooks used in class, fell within the "fair dealing" exception to infringement for the purposes of research or private study. Both the Board and the Federal Court of Appeal found that, where copies were made on the teachers' own initiative, rather than at the request of students, the true "purpose of the dealing" was "instruction" and not "private study" and the dealing was not fair. A coalition of provincial ministers of education appealed.

In another 5-4 split, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal. Writing for the majority, Abella, J. reinforced that "fair dealing" is a user's right and that that "research" should not be limited to creative purposes. Because the parties had agreed that the copies at issue were for "private study", and therefore satisfied the first step of the CCH test, the Court turned immediately to the application of the CCH fairness factors. As in SOCAN v. Bell, it held that the relevant "purpose" was that of the students as end users, not the teachers as copiers. Although a copier cannot "hide behind the shield of the user's allowable purpose in order to engage in a separate purpose that tends to make the dealing unfair," that was not the case on the facts before the Court. Here, the majority found that teachers as copiers and students as users share a "symbiotic purpose" in that the teachers' instruction, by necessity, guides and facilitates the students' research and private study. To the majority, separating study in a classroom setting from individual study and learning in "splendid isolation" was an artificial distinction, and the Court stated that once again.

After reviewing the remaining CCH factors – including by repeating the direction in SOCAN v. Bell that the aggregate amount of copying is not to be considered as relevant to the "amount of the dealing" but, instead, to the "character of the dealing", and finding that there appeared to be insufficient evidence to support the Board's finding that photocopying by schools had an adverse effect on the market for textbooks – the Court held that, on the facts before the Board, it was unreasonable to conclude that the copies in question were not "fair dealing." It therefore remitted the matter back to the Board for reconsideration, with the CCH factors to be reapplied in light of the reasons of the majority.

5.  No Public Performance Royalties for Movie Soundtracks Accompanying Films

The fifth and final copyright decision of the day was Re:Sound v. Motion Picture Theatre Associations of Canada.7 Re:Sound, formerly the Neighbouring Rights Collective of Canada, filed two tariff proposals claiming royalties for the performance in public, and the communication to the public, of pre-existing recorded music used in the soundtracks of movies and television programs. The Copyright Board refused to certify the tariffs, holding that, while the performance and communication of sound recordings does attract royalties in certain circumstances, the definition of "sound recording" in the Copyright Act specifically excludes soundtracks when they accompany cinematographic works. The Federal Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the Board.

The Supreme Court dismissed Re:Sound's appeal. In a unanimous decision authored by LeBel J., it held that, under the Act, "[u]nless what is being performed or communicated to the public by telecommunication is a 'sound recording', the right to collect royalties on that communication or performance will not be triggered." The Court agreed with the Board that even a pre-existing sound recording, when embodied in the "soundtrack" of a cinematographic work, is not a "sound recording" within the meaning of the Act "where it accompanies the cinematographic work." In other words, while the owner of copyright in a particular sound recording may be entitled to royalties when the recording is performed or communicated separately from the soundtrack of a film or television program, there is no similar entitlement when that performance or communication takes place only as part of the performance or communication of the film or television program itself. .

Footnotes

1 Casey Chisick, Tim Pinos and Jason Beitchman of Cassels Brock were counsel to CMRRA-SODRAC Inc. (CSI), a co-appellant in one of the appeals and an intervener in three others.

2 2012 SCC 34.

3 2012 SCC 35.

4 2012 SCC 36.

5 2004 SCC 13.

6 2012 SCC 37.

7 2012 SCC 38.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Casey Chisick
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions