Canada: The One-Year Grace Period For Patent Filing In Canada: An Overview For U.S. Practitioners

Canada is one of a handful of countries that has a one-year grace period for public disclosures made by inventors. The one-year grace period available under Canadian law is summarized in this article, and similarities and differences between the Canadian and U.S. one-year grace periods are discussed. The Canadian grace period is discussed in relation to both current U.S. law and the amended sections 35 U.S.C. §102 and §103 soon to be coming into force under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act ("AIA").

The one-year grace period in Canada. Paragraph 28.2(1)(a) of the Canadian Patent Act, governing relative novelty in Canada, states that the claimed invention in the Canadian patent application must not have been disclosed:

more than one year before the filing date by the applicant, or by a person who obtained knowledge, directly or indirectly, from the applicant, in such a manner that the subject-matter became available to the public in Canada or elsewhere.

Section 28.3 of the Canadian Patent Act, governing obviousness, has a similar provision. Thus, the statute provides a one-year grace period for disclosures made by the applicant. This one-year grace period runs from the filing date in Canada, not the priority date. In the case of a PCT national phase entry, the Canadian filing date is deemed to be the PCT international filing date.

Issues that arise from these provisions include: (i) what constitutes a disclosure that will trigger the start of the one-year grace period in Canada; (ii) who is the applicant; and (iii) whether there are derivation proceedings in Canada. These issues are addressed in turn below.

Disclosures that trigger the start of the one-year grace period. Any disclosure in which "the subject-matter became available to the public in Canada or elsewhere" will trigger the start of the one-year grace period in Canada. Thus, the disclosure must be a public disclosure. This means, for example, a disclosure of the invention under a non-disclosure agreement will not trigger the start of the one-year grace period.

There are no geographic restrictions under Canadian law in respect of the grace period. The public disclosure can happen anywhere in the world. Also, the public disclosure can be in any form (written, oral, etc.).

Enabling disclosure. The question of whether a public use or public sale of the invention is a public disclosure was considered in Canwell Enviro-Industries Ltd. et al. v. Baker Petrolite Corp. et al. 2002 FCA 158. In short, a prior public use or public sale of the invention may or may not be a public disclosure that will trigger the start of the one-year grace period. To qualify as a public disclosure, the public use or public sale of the invention must be an "enabling" disclosure.

What constitutes an "enabling" disclosure is subject to debate and usually turns on the facts of the case. The basic principle is that, if a person skilled in the art would be enabled to arrive at the invention from the disclosure without exercising inventive skill or undue burden, then the disclosure is enabling. For example, if the invention formed part of a product sold prior to the filing of a patent application in Canada, and if a person skilled in the art had the ability to discover the invention through non-inventive routine reverse engineering, then a public sale of the product would likely be considered an enabling disclosure of the invention.

Offer for sale. The same principle applies to an offer for sale. An offer for sale will only trigger the start of the one-year grace period in Canada if the offer for sale constitutes an enabling public disclosure.

Although there is room for argument as to whether a particular use, sale, or offer for sale of the invention constitutes an enabling public disclosure, the safest approach is to assume that any prior non-confidential use, sale, or offer for sale of the invention is potentially an enabling public disclosure, and to file a patent application in Canada within one year of the earliest such use, sale, or offer for sale.

The applicant under Canadian practice. The one-year grace period in Canada applies to public disclosures made by the applicant, or by another who obtained knowledge, directly or indirectly, from the applicant. Under Canadian law, the applicant includes the inventors and the legal representative of the inventors (typically the assignee).

Practically speaking, this means that in Canada, any disclosures originating from either the inventors or the assignee within the one-year period prior to the filing of the Canadian patent application are not citable against the application when assessing novelty or obviousness. This is the case even if the assignee's disclosure did not originate from the inventor.

Derivation proceedings in Canada. The one-year grace period in Canada applies to public disclosures made by the applicant, or by another "who obtained knowledge, directly or indirectly, from the applicant." Therefore, the grace period in Canada arguably protects inventor-derived disclosures, but what about inventor-derived applications?

Canada does not have derivation proceedings and there is little jurisprudence on the topic. There is, however, one recent Canadian case addressing this topic, which was decided in favour of the party that had relied upon the one-year grace period. In Ultraviolet Systems Inc. v. Brasscorp Ltd., 2009 FC 58, Party A disclosed the invention to the public and filed a patent application in Canada approximately 10 months after the public disclosure. However, in the interim, Party B viewed Party A's disclosed invention and filed a patent application that included a description of Party A's disclosed invention. A reading of paragraphs 28.2(1)(c) and (d) of the Canadian Patent Act suggests that this description of Party A's invention in Party B's application may be citable against Party A's application. However, the Court held that the disclosure in Party B's application was not citable as prior art since "it would not make any sense to allow the subject matter of a claim to be disclosed in the period of one year prior to the filing date and still be patentable if someone else could use the disclosed subject matter as prior art to defeat the applicant's application for a patent."

Despite this favourable decision, and in view of the lack of formal derivation procedures in Canada, the safest approach is to take steps to protect confidential information and minimize reliance on the one-year grace period in Canada.

Three key differences between the U.S. grace period (pre-AIA) and the Canadian grace period. The Canadian grace period is summarized above. From the discussion above, a U.S. practitioner will recognize that there are differences between the grace period in Canada and the grace period in the U.S. A few key differences are summarized below.

(1) The grace period in Canada runs from the filing date in Canada, not the filing date of the priority application.

A typical hypothetical scenario frequently encountered by a Canadian patent practitioner is that an invention was disclosed by the applicant on June 1, 2010, and a U.S. application claiming that invention was filed on May 1, 2011, within one year of the disclosure. The question often posed is, can an application be filed in Canada on May 1, 2012, which claims priority from the U.S. application? Unfortunately, the answer is no. The fact that the U.S. priority application was filed within one year of the disclosure is irrelevant. The filing of the priority application does not extend the Canadian grace period. The Canadian filing date must be no more than one year after the disclosure.

To preserve Canadian rights, U.S. practitioners should consider docketing to file in Canada within one year of the first non-confidential disclosure of the invention, as soon as it is known or suspected that there has been or will be such a disclosure. Otherwise, simply docketing to file in Canada within one year of the earliest priority date will not preserve Canadian rights if there has been an enabling public disclosure of the invention before the priority application is filed.

(2) There is no absolute on-sale bar in Canada.

Under current U.S. law (35 U.S.C. §102(b)), a sale or offer for sale of the invention within the U.S., even if confidential, may trigger the start of the one-year grace period in the U.S. However, under Canadian law, there is no absolute on-sale bar. Rather, there needs to be an enabling public disclosure of the invention in order to trigger the start of the one-year grace period in Canada. As discussed above, a sale or offer for sale of the invention may or may not be an enabling public disclosure. For example, if a person skilled in the art would not be able to derive or reverse engineer the invention from the sold product (without exercising inventive skill or undue burden), then the sale is likely not an enabling public disclosure.

Even though the U.S. on-sale bar may operate to prohibit a U.S. patent from being obtained, it may still be possible to obtain a patent in Canada depending upon whether or not the sale or offer for sale constituted an enabling public disclosure. Notably, a confidential sale or offer for sale (e.g. under a non-disclosure agreement) in the U.S. may trigger the U.S. on-sale bar, but it will not trigger the start of the grace period in Canada, as it is not a public disclosure.

(3) There are no geographical restrictions in Canada

Under Canadian law, it does not matter in which country the public disclosure was made, or the form of the public disclosure (written, oral, use, etc.). Any enabling public disclosure will trigger the start of the one-year grace period in Canada.

This is in contrast to current 35 U.S.C. §102(b) in which, for example, public uses and public sales of the invention outside the U.S. will not trigger the start of the one-year grace period in the U.S.

The effect of the AIA on Canadian and U.S. filing strategies. Any U.S. patent application containing one or more claims having a first effective filing date after March 16, 2013, will be subject to the new sections 35 U.S.C. §102 and 35 U.S.C. §103 amended by the AIA.

The AIA introduces sweeping changes to 35 U.S.C. §102, including substantial changes to the one-year grace period available under U.S. law. Like in Canada, the new grace period introduced by the AIA has no geographical restrictions, and is not limited to certain forms of disclosure (written, oral, uses, etc). However, in contrast to Canada, the U.S. grace period will be calculated back from the priority date of the U.S. application, not the U.S. filing date. Of course, the AIA has no impact on the Canadian grace period. That is, it will still be necessary to file a patent application in Canada within one year of the public disclosure.

This difference gives rise to new filing strategies. For example, one approach is to file a patent application in Canada within one year of the public disclosure (as is necessary), and then file the corresponding U.S. application a year later claiming priority back to the Canadian application. This will delay the start of the patent term in the U.S., which may be desirable if the invention is slow to come to market. Additionally, accelerated examination could be requested in Canada, and if the Canadian examination leads to a favourable allowance, examination could then be requested under the Patent Prosecution Highway in the corresponding U.S. application.

Conclusion. While Canada and the U.S. both provide a one-year grace period for disclosures made by inventors, there are differences between the Canadian provisions and both the current U.S. provisions and the U.S. provisions under the AIA. These differences can affect filing strategies in Canada and the U.S.

The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions