We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
The Ministry of Labour has recently announced its
inspection blitzes for the remainder of 2012 and the beginning of
2013. The blitzes will focus on sector-specific hazards and are
designed to raise awareness and increase compliance with health and
safety legislation. The Ministry will report the results of the
blitzes, and will track each sector to determine if the blitzes
resulted in an increase in health and safety legislation compliance
and a decrease in injuries.
The following table sets out the scheduled blitzes:
Focus
Sector
Date
New and Young Worker
Health Care
Construction
Industrial
May-August 2012
Struck by Objects
(hazards associated with traffic control during
roadwork)
Construction
June 2012
Tower Cranes/Mobile Cranes
Construction
July-August 2012
Pits and Quarries, Sand and Gravel Pits
(hazards associated with the haulage process)
Mining
July 2012
Supervisory Engagement in Construction
(requirements under Section 14, Reg. 213/91)
Construction
September-October 2012
Manufacturing
(machine guarding, MSD, workplace violence)
Industrial Sector
October – November 2012
Infection Prevention and Control
Health Care
October-November 2012
Underground Mining
(hazards associated with ore pass and loading pocket
systems)
Mining
November-December 2012
Underground Mining
(ventilation hazards)
Mining
January-February 2013
Slips, Trips and Falls
(ladder safety and fall protection hazards)
Industrial
Construction
February-March 2013
Workplace Violence and Harassment
Health Care
February-March 2013
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The Federal Court of Appeal recently weighed in to reconcile competing tests on the proper way to determine whether an individual is a contractor or truly an employee.
A discussion on a recent decision of the Federal Court of Appeal, which confirms that the central question is, whether the person is performing the services as his own business, on his own account.
Back in July 2012, we covered "PVYW v Comcare" (No 2), [2012] FCA 395, which concerned an employee in the HR department of an Australian government agency who was injured on a work-related trip to a country town in New South Wales.
The employee, Ashworth, alleged that the manager demanded that she close the door and then positioned herself in front of the closed door and started screaming and pointing her finger in the employee’s face.
Some organizations subscribe to the close your eyes and think good thoughts school of drafting, when it comes to non-competition agreements in employment contracts.
A discussion on the judicial decision in a recent case, where a BC employer has successfully defended a claim for constructive dismissal despite taking away supervisory duties and moving the employee from an office to a cubicle.