Canada: Doing Business In Canada: Immigration (Business)

By Christopher Garrah1

In today's increasingly global economy, Canadian employers often turn to foreign nationals to maintain a competitive edge and to remedy skill shortages in the domestic labor market.

Recent developments in Canadian immigration law have made it more challenging for Canadian employers and foreign entities with Canadian operations to conveniently move skilled and key personnel into Canada. In April 2011, new regulations were implemented under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act ("IRPA"). Although the new regulations are aimed at protecting foreign workers, they directly impact all employers by implementing a more rigorous application process and by imposing a four-year cap on certain types of work permits. At the same time, employers are facing a more restrictive work permit process, it is also becoming more difficult for foreign nationals to obtain permanent resident status as caps have been implemented under the federal skilled worker program and higher monetary thresholds have been implemented under immigrant investor programs. Layered on top of these changes is the fact that Canada's overall approach to immigration is being reviewed as part of a comprehensive public consultation on immigration priorities.

This paper focuses on recent developments in Canadian business immigration law. We address the following:

1. the impact of new foreign worker regulations;

2. new restrictions under the federal skilled worker category for obtaining permanent resident status;

3. developments with respect to immigrant investor and provincial nominee programs; and

4. the public consultation process on immigration mix.

introduction of new foreign worker regulations

A significant development in business immigration law was the April 2011 implementation of regulations under the IRPA aimed at protecting foreign workers. Until these regulations came into force, there were few practical safeguards to protect foreign workers from unscrupulous employers. Widely viewed as a reaction to media reports regarding the exploitation and poor treatment of low skilled foreign workers by Canadian employers and their recruiters, these regulations, for the most part, do not differentiate between foreign workers at various skill levels. As implementation continues, we should expect more extensive information sharing between federal and provincial agencies and retention of more detailed, immediately accessible information about Canadian employers and their past employment practices.

The centerpiece of the new regulations is a more rigorous assessment of the job offer and of the employer's past commitments to foreign nationals it has employed. For positions requiring a Labour Market Opinion (government certification that, among other things, no Canadian citizens or permanent residents are available for the position and that the employee will be paid the prevailing wage for the position), the assessment will be completed by Service Canada as part of that process. For Labour Market Opinion-exempt positions, the assessment will be completed by Citizenship and Immigration Canada ("CIC") or the Canada Border Services Agency when a work permit is requested.

The assessing agency is required to consider the genuineness of the job offer. Four factors are to be considered, being whether:

  • the employer is actively engaged in the business in respect of which the offer is made;
  • the job offer is consistent with the reasonable employment needs of the employer;
  • the employer is reasonably able to fulfill the terms of the job offer; and
  • the employer or a recruiter acting on its behalf has complied with federal/provincial/territorial laws regulating employment or recruitment in the province/territory where the worker will be employed.

If the employer has previously employed foreign workers, the assessing agency will also consider whether the employer has, in the two years preceding the application at hand, provided to such foreign workers wages, working conditions and occupation type that are substantially the same ("STS") as those set out in their job offer. Where the information available indicates non-compliance, the employer will have the opportunity to provide reasonable justification. Such justification may include:

  • a change in federal or provincial laws or applicable collective agreements;
  • the implementation of measures by the employer in response to a dramatic change in economic conditions that directly affected the employer, provided that the measures were not directed disproportionately at foreign workers;
  • an error in interpretation made in good faith by the employer with respect to its obligations to the foreign worker, if the employer subsequently provided compensation or made sufficient attempts to do so to all foreign nationals who suffered a disadvantage as a result of the error;
  • an unintentional accounting or administrative error made by the employer, if the employer subsequently provided compensation or made sufficient attempts to do so to all foreign nationals who suffered a disadvantage as a result of the error; or
  • similar or related justifications.

While we were initially concerned about the compliance burden that the more rigorous assessments might impose on Canadian employers, we have been pleased that the practical impact to date has been minimal. Some application forms were revised, new certifications were introduced and additional documentation is sometimes required by the assessing agency. As a whole, however, these measures have not substantially increased red tape. We have noted that the period for review of Labour Market Opinion applications has increased by 30 per cent or more. We trust that Service Canada will seek to reduce processing times to more acceptable levels, either through streamlining its internal procedures or by allocating additional resources.

Employers that fail, without reasonable justification, to provide substantially the same wages, working conditions or occupation type may face refusal of work permit applications in respect of any foreign national offered employment by that employer, may render the employer ineligible to hire any foreign nationals for a period of two years, and may lead to the employer's name being posted on the CIC website. The regulations also prohibit a foreign national from entering into, or extending, an employment agreement with an ineligible employer.

Obviously, a negative STS determination can immediately and irreparably harm the employer's reputation and ability to access foreign talent to alleviate shortages in the domestic labor market. At this point, there is no appeal process for a negative STS determination or listing on the CIC website. CIC is well aware of the consequences of a negative assessment and we would expect that they will act with a commensurate level of prudence and caution. Six months after the implementation of the regulations, no employers have been listed on the ineligibility list. Still, the negative impacts associated with such an event should cause employers to audit their current situations with respect to foreign workers and to take appropriate measures now to remedy any non-compliance.

The regulations also introduced a maximum cumulative duration for the period that a foreign national can work in Canada. This four-year cap highlights the temporary nature of the work permit regime and will encourage longer-term foreign workers to apply for permanent residence to formalize their status.

Calculation of the four-year cap started on April 1, 2011. With certain notable exceptions, all work in Canada after that date counts towards the four-year cap, including work done while under implied status, unless the work was performed during a period of authorized full-time study. Work in Canada prior to April 2011 does not count towards the four-year total. Once a foreign national has accumulated four years of work in Canada, CIC is authorized to refuse the issuance of a further work permit. Foreign nationals applying for work permit renewals near the end of the four-year period are likely to see work permit validity periods truncated in keeping with the cap.

If caught by the cap, a foreign national must spend four years either outside Canada or in Canada but not working in order to restart the clock on a new four-year period.

There are certain useful exemptions and exceptions to the four-year cap including those for foreign nationals working in managerial or professional occupations, under work permits issued under international agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement and the General Agreement on Trade in Services, and under work permits issued under the significant benefit provisions of the regulations.

Work permit duration will generally be used to calculate cumulative duration. Upon presentation of appropriate evidence, however, CIC will consider not counting gaps in employment such as extended medical leaves, maternity/parental leaves, international assignments or other absences from Canada. Clearly, foreign workers intending to 'recapture' time in this manner should accumulate appropriate documentation or other evidence over the course of their employment and keep detailed records to support such claims.

In response to these regulatory changes, we have advised clients to place an increased emphasis on record keeping with respect to their foreign workers and applicable terms of employment, to consolidate hiring and decision-making authority with respect to foreign workers in one person or department, and to promptly notify Service Canada or CIC of any changes in the employment relationship.

federal skilled worker restrictions

Canada has granted permanent resident status to approximately a quarter of a million immigrants each year since 2002. One class of permanent residents is referred to as the "economic immigrant class". Among the categories of immigrants in the economic immigrant class is the federal skilled worker category. A "federal skilled worker" refers to a skilled worker applying to live anywhere in Canada, other than in Québec which has its own immigration requirements, who is selected based on his or her ability to become economically established in Canada.

Applicants under the Federal Skilled Workers ("FSW") program must pass an approved language proficiency test and have either a valid offer of arranged employment or a minimum of one year of continuous full-time (or equivalent) work experience within the last ten years in one of 29 occupations. For a list of eligible occupations, see The eligible occupations were selected based on Canadian labor market needs.

Once a federal skilled worker meets the eligibility requirements to apply, he or she is evaluated in the areas of education, work experience, language proficiency, age, adaptability and whether he or she has arranged employment in Canada. These criteria are demonstrated indicators of how well immigrants economically establish themselves in Canada. Points are assigned to an applicant for each criteria up to a possible maximum of 100 points. A pass mark of 67 points or higher is not determinative but indicates that an applicant "may qualify to immigrate".

The FSW program is a popular route for immigrants applying for permanent resident status, and, as a result, the program has been plagued with backlogs. In 2008, amendments to the IRPA and the Action Plan for Fast Immigration (the "Action Plan"), an initiative implemented to deal with processing backlogs, led to changes in how applications are processed. Prior to the Action Plan, it was mandatory that all applications be processed which led to a backlog of more than 640,000 people in the FSW program with wait times of up to six years. The amendments to the IRPA authorized the Minister of Immigration to issue ministerial instructions to visa officers. Ministerial instructions addressing the eligibility of applications for processing were contained in the Action Plan. The eligibility criteria contained in the ministerial instructions (for example, an original list of 38 in-demand occupations) applied to all federal skilled worker applications received on or after February 27, 2008. Since implementation of the Action Plan, the backlog has been reduced to approximately 316,000 people with wait times ranging from approximately six to 12 months.

On June 26, 2010, a second set of ministerial instructions introduced a cap on the number of applications that would be processed in the FSW category. A total of 20,000 applications would be processed under the FSW category per year with a corresponding 1,000 applications cap per occupation per year. This cap did not apply to applicants with a valid offer of arranged employment. Effective July 1, 2011, the total applications cap was decreased to 10,000 with a corresponding cap of 500 applications per eligible occupation. The cap on the total number of applications was introduced because there were more applications in the FSW category than the government could process while the cap per occupation was introduced to mitigate against "over-representation of any one occupation". Three months after the reduced caps were imposed, Registered Nurses and Professional Occupations in Business Services to Management have reached the occupational caps and, accordingly, no more applications will be accepted for those occupations until July 2012.

CIC has emphasized that the objective of introducing the caps is to improve processing times. Prior to the Action Plan in 2008, wait times grew as the backlog increased, forcing applicants to wait years before knowing if they would be granted permanent resident status. CIC emphasizes that an important distinction to recognize is that the program has not led to a reduction in applicants granted permanent resident status, or in the proportionate representation of FSW applicants among those granted permanent resident status, it has only limited the number of applications that will be processed.

immigrant investor and provincial nominee program developments

The Canadian federal government and the province of Québec both offer passive investment options for foreign nationals seeking permanent resident status in Canada. These programs allow applicants to obtain such status in exchange for a five-year interest-free loan to the government. The federal government distributes the proceeds generated to fund economic development and local job creation initiatives in participating provinces and territories. Funds raised by the Québec program are used exclusively in Québec for similar purposes. Both programs have undergone changes in the last year to accommodate a growing volume of applications and to better align Canada's passive investment requirements with those of other comparable immigrant-receiving countries.

The purpose of the federal Immigrant Investor Program (the "Federal Program") is to attract "experienced business people who bring significant economic benefits to Canada". Research has demonstrated that the Federal Program has been instrumental both in securing up front capital investments from immigrants and in gaining the "business acumen, important links to global economies and an understanding of international markets" immigrants contribute once they are permanent residents or Canadian citizens.

The Federal Program requires that an applicant meet three eligibility criteria. An applicant must:

  1. demonstrate that he or she has at least two years of business experience in the last five years which requires ownership of a business or managerial experience;
  2. have a minimum personal net worth of C$1,600,000 obtained legally; and
  3. make an investment of C$800,000 which will be returned five years later on an interest-free basis, and which is secured by the provinces or territories using the funds for their own economic initiatives.

In June 2010, the Federal Program was suspended until December 1, 2010, to allow CIC an opportunity to deal with backlogs. The Federal Program was in need of an overhaul in order to bring it in line with comparable programs in other immigrant-receiving countries as the eligibility criteria had not changed since 1999. For example, Australia, the United Kingdom, New Zealand and the United States all required investments of at least C$1,000,000, while at that time the Federal Program only required an investment of C$400,000. Effective December 1, 2010, the investment requirement under the Federal Program was increased to C$800,000 and the personal net worth requirement was increased from C$800,000 to C$1,600,000. Another objective of introducing more demanding eligibility criteria was to reduce the flow of applications. The number of applications to the Federal Program had almost tripled between 2007 and 2010, contributing to excessive wait times. Furthermore, a cost-benefit analysis estimated that implementation of the more demanding criteria would provide an increase of approximately C$72,300,000 per year in investment capital.

Effective July 1, 2011, a cap of 700 applications was introduced for the first time. This cap was introduced because CIC was still receiving more applications than it could process. Despite the more demanding eligibility requirements, we understand that the Federal Program was flooded within applications within a few days. The program was suspended at that time and, until the cap is reset on July 1, 2012, no more new applications will be accepted.

The Québec Immigrant Investor Program (the "Québec Program") has similar eligibility requirements and is available to applicants intending to settle in Québec. Prior to December 2010, the Québec Program had the same requirements as the Federal Program previously had. After changes in December 2010, applicants must have a net worth of C$1,600,000 and agree to invest C$800,000 with the province of Québec for five years on an interest-free basis. Applicants who meet the eligibility criteria of the Québec Program and pass the selection interview, if required, are issued a selection certificate. Once selected, the applicant applies to CIC for permanent resident status.

The Québec Program has experienced similar issues with backlogs as the Federal Program. As a result, the Québec Program was temporarily suspended in October 2010 until the new changes in the eligibility criteria took effect in December of that year. However, the Québec Program did not adopt a cap on the number of applications and, as a result, the Québec Program is still accepting applications. While we have no direct information about oversubscription of the program, it is not difficult to imagine that the Québec Program could be experiencing heightened strain as a result of the suspension of the Federal Program.

Most provinces have a provincial nominee program ("PNP") that allows the province to nominate foreign nationals who intend to settle in that province. These programs require that certain "active investment" criteria be satisfied which reflect an applicant's ability to make an economic contribution to Canada. By agreement with the federal government, the provinces have broad discretion to develop their own eligibility criteria which reflect local immigration needs and policies. Depending on the province, immigrants may be nominated if they are skilled workers, semi-skilled workers, international graduates of Canadian universities, entrepreneurs intending to own a business in the province, self-employed persons or are persons with family connections in Canada. Once nominated, an applicant applies to CIC for permanent resident status. Prince Edward Island has a PNP and prior to being shut down in September 2008, the PEI PNP had an immigrant investor stream which allowed immigrants to invest in a local business in exchange for nomination. After the federal government announced that the immigrant investor portion of the PNP program would be shut down, thousands of immigrants were rushed through in only a few months, with media reports stating that C$400 million was saved.

In 2008, allegations of fraud and bribery surrounding the PEI PNP surfaced and have recently resurfaced. In September 2011, three former provincial government workers came forward claiming that senior bureaucrats pressured them to approve certain applications. The federal government has asked the RCMP and Canada Border Services Agency to investigate. Whether or not these allegations are proven, we expect the federal government to re-evaluate the efficacy and appropriateness of PNPs. This will entail a careful balancing of provincial demands to select immigrants and generate local investment with the perception held by some that these programs can be used to buy permanent resident status.

public consultation on immigration mix

The IRPA identifies 19 objectives with respect to immigration and refugees. These objectives may be classified as either economic priorities, family priorities or refugee and humanitarian priorities, all of which must be balanced in Canada's approach to immigration. Statistics on immigration levels indicate that CIC granted permanent resident status to 251,642 applicants in 2010, 138,251 of which were economic immigrants. These numbers reveal that 55 per cent of the applicants CIC admitted last year were economic immigrants, which is consistent with its track record between 2005 and 2009 of admitting between 55 per cent and 61 per cent of applicants based on economic factors.

The IRPA does not provide guidance on how to balance these objectives and, consequently, it is difficult to know if the current approach to immigration in Canada is optimal. A tension exists between all three classes of priorities and trade-offs are necessary to achieve an appropriate balance. In particular, the apparent emphasis on admitting applicants who can contribute to Canada's economy and labor market, as demonstrated by the data, may call into question CIC's selection approach. While it is widely accepted that immigration is important for meeting labor market needs and building a skilled workforce, the economic priorities of immigration must be reconciled with the other objectives identified under the IRPA. CIC has recently reached out to the Canadian public for its advice on how the government should prioritize these conflicting objectives.

In July 2011, the Minister of Immigration launched a series of cross-country consultations on immigration levels and mix which was followed by an online consultation process that closed in September 2011. The public consultation sought feedback from various stakeholders, including employers, unions, academics, academic institutions, professional organizations, businesses and municipalities, among other interested groups. CIC asked participants to respond to the following questions respecting Canada's immigration program:

  • What is the right level of immigration in Canada?
  • How many applicants in each of the three immigrant classes (economic, family, and protected persons) should be admitted?
  • Should immigration levels be higher?
  • Which of these areas should be a priority?
  • If we raise levels in one of the areas, where should we take less?

CIC reports that during the cross-country consultations in July and August, stakeholders "identified immigration as a critical way to meet labor market needs, citing economic factors as among the most important considerations when establishing immigration levels". A report providing a more comprehensive overview of the public response will be published by CIC sometime in late 2011 or early 2012.

In early 2011, CIC conducted another public consultation regarding its proposed changes to the FSW program. The proposed changes involved adjustments to the number of points attributable to each of the following six eligibility criteria: education; proficiency in English and/or French; experience; age; arranged employment in Canada; and adaptability. The purpose of the proposed adjustments is to weigh the criteria in a way that more accurately reflects their value as indicia of an applicant's ability to become economically established in Canada. Specifically, CIC proposed increasing the importance of proficiency in official languages and age while decreasing the importance of work experience and the number of years of education required for skilled tradespeople. In support of this position, CIC cited research suggesting that people who are proficient in an official language, or are younger (aged 20-30), have the greatest economic impact on the receiving country. The results of this public consultation will be published by CIC sometime in the fall of 2011.

Although comprehensive results of these two public consultations have not yet been published, there is some information available that may provide insight into how the Canadian public has responded to CIC's inquiries. For example, in an evaluation of the FSW program released in August 2010, surveys of stakeholders revealed that employers had found it difficult to fill positions for which federal skilled workers were subsequently hired.

Furthermore, stakeholders expressed their views on the importance of economic immigration by citing labor shortages and the aging population as reasons for maintaining the FSW program. These endorsements of the FSW program may not provide a full picture on the views of Canadians with respect to balancing economic immigration with other classes of immigration; however, they do demonstrate that economic immigration is valued by Canadians.

The results of another public consultation performed in 2010, respecting what levels of immigration should be maintained in 2011, may also provide some insight on how the Canadian public values economic versus non-economic factors in the context of immigration selection. While a number of objectives and selection factors were cited by respondents, the overall conclusion of the consultation was that "economic factors [were] primary considerations when establishing immigration levels and objectives".


1 The author acknowledges the contributions of Jocelyn Reikie, Articling Student, in preparing this paper.

The foregoing provides only an overview. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, a qualified lawyer should be consulted.

© Copyright 2012 McMillan LLP

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.