Canada: Supreme Court Clarifies Law Of Assumed Jurisdiction Over Foreign Defendants

The Supreme Court of Canada has released three long-awaited unanimous decisions that set out a new approach to be followed by Ontario courts in assuming jurisdiction over foreign defendants. The Court's decisions reaffirm the long-standing "real and substantial connection" test, but also provide clarity to the factors to be considered in applying the test. The decisions attempt to set a uniform standard across Canada, however, differing provincial statutes and case law will continue to inform the approach in each province.

The Court's main judgment ( Club Resorts) concerns two cases (Van Breda and Charron) where Canadian tourists suffered personal injury and death in Cuba and lawsuits were subsequently brought against a Cayman Islands-based hotel manager in Ontario. The two other cases, Richard C. Breeden v. Conrad Black (Black) and Les Éditions Écosociété Inc. et al. v. Banro Corporation (Banro), required the Court to apply the new test for assuming jurisdiction from Club Resorts in the context of multi-jurisdictional defamation claims. In each case, the Court concluded that jurisdiction was properly assumed over the non-resident defendants, and that there was no reason to decline to exercise jurisdiction as the defendants had not shown there was a clearly more appropriate forum.

New Test for Assumed Jurisdiction for Tort Claims in Ontario

Prior to Club Resorts, the Ontario courts applied a multi-factor analysis to determine whether a real and substantial connection existed in a particular case. Even if a court determined that it had jurisdiction, it could use its discretion to conclude that another jurisdiction would be better suited for the trial of the issues (i.e., on the grounds of forum non conveniens). In Van Breda, the Ontario Court of Appeal reformulated the analysis for determining whether a real and substantial connection sufficient to ground jurisdiction existed in a particular case. For a summary of the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision, see our previous Blakes Bulletin.

The Court in Club Resorts has sought to bring greater certainty to the application of the real and substantial connection test for assumed jurisdiction. The Court rejected the Court of Appeal's multi-factor approach, which was first set out in Muscutt and reformulated, though not fundamentally changed, in Van Breda. Under the new approach, plaintiffs bringing tort claims in Ontario must demonstrate a "presumptive connecting factor" that links the subject matter of the litigation with Ontario. The Court identified four non-exhaustive "presumptive connecting factors," as follows:

  • the defendant is domiciled or resident in the province;
  • the defendant carries on business in the province;
  • the tort was committed in the province; and
  • a contract connected with the dispute was made in the province.

If a presumptive connecting factor exists, then unless the defendant rebuts the presumption, the court must assume jurisdiction over all aspects of the case.

Rebutting the presumption will not be easy. It will be rebutted only if the defendant establishes "facts which demonstrate that the presumptive connecting factor does not point to any real relationship between the subject matter of the litigation and the forum or points only to a weak relationship between them". So, where a contract has little or nothing to do with the subject matter of the litigation, or the connecting factor is that the defendant is carrying on business in a province but the subject matter of the litigation is unrelated to the defendant's business activities there, it may be possible to rebut the presumption of jurisdiction. In particular, the Court cautioned that the presumptive connecting factor of carrying on business must be applied with care. To be "carrying on business" requires some "form of actual, not only virtual, presence in the jurisdiction, such as maintaining an office there or regularly visiting the territory of the particular jurisdiction". Activities such as advertising or making one's website available in Ontario, on their own, would not constitute "carrying on business" in Ontario.

The factors above are not intended to be exhaustive, and courts may identify new presumptive connecting factors over time. The Court noted, however, that the mere presence of the plaintiff in a jurisdiction or the fact that damages were sustained in a jurisdiction are not, on their own, presumptive connecting factors.

The Court emphasized that all the presumptive connecting factors are underlain by the values of order, fairness, and comity, and "generally point to a relationship between the subject matter of the litigation and the forum such that it would be reasonable to expect that the defendant would be called to answer legal proceedings in that forum." If a plaintiff cannot show that a recognized presumptive connecting factor – whether listed or new – exists, the court will not have jurisdiction over the dispute.

Forum of Necessity

The Court noted in Club Resorts that while an absence of a presumptive connecting factor will mean that the Ontario court will not have jurisdiction based on a real and substantial connection, there is a possibility an Ontario court could assert jurisdiction as a "forum of necessity", such as where no other jurisdiction has a stronger claim or another jurisdiction is not available. As the forum of necessity issue did not arise on the facts of Club Resorts, the Court declined to address the concept.

Forum Non Conveniens Framework

Once the plaintiff establishes the Ontario court has jurisdiction, the question shifts to consideration of forum non conveniens grounds. To obtain this exceptional discretionary relief, a defendant must show that another forum is "clearly more appropriate" because that other forum is better suited to "fairly and efficiently" resolve the dispute. Thus, unlike the prior law under Muscutt and Van Breda, which involved a weighing of various connections in determining jurisdiction – which often involved similar considerations as found under the forum non conveniens analysis – the Court has limited the jurisdiction test and attempted to keep the more discretionary balancing involved in considering convenient forum separate.

The Court has not made significant changes here. There is no strict forum non conveniens "test". Instead, a defendant can raise a number of factors which may, but need not, include the locations of parties and witnesses, the cost of transferring the case to another jurisdiction or of declining the stay, the impact of a transfer on the conduct of the litigation or on related or parallel proceedings, the possibility of conflicting judgments, problems related to the recognition and enforcement of judgments, and the relative strengths of the connections of the two parties.

Outcome and Implications

The Court concluded that jurisdiction had been properly assumed in each of the four cases on appeal. The presumptive connecting factor in Van Breda was the existence of a contract in Ontario, whereas, in Charron, it was the fact that the defendant carried on significant business activities in Ontario. In Black, the defamatory words were downloaded, read, and re-published in Ontario where the plaintiff had a significant reputation (although he no longer lives there). And in Banro, an Ontario-based corporation was able to sue Quebec-based defendants over a book published in French, because 108 copies of the book were available to be purchased or read in Ontario (93 in bookstores and 15 in libraries) and the book was also available for sale via the defendants' website. In none of the four cases was the presumption of jurisdiction rebutted, nor did the forum non conveniens doctrine apply.

As a result of these decisions, courts will likely be more active in taking jurisdiction and there may be a reduction in the number of challenges to courts assuming authority over foreign defendants. The adoption of presumptive connecting factors and the clear burden on defendants to rebut those factors will be difficult to overcome in many cases. However, as the list of presumptive connecting factors is not exhaustive, and the decision is limited to assumed jurisdiction over tort claims, the applicability of the Club Resorts analysis to non-tort cases will likely require further consideration in the next few years.

Defamation Claims and "Libel Tourism"

As for multi-jurisdictional defamation claims in particular, the decisions are likely to result in an increase in so-called "libel tourism". In confirming that the tort of defamation "occurs" when and where a defamatory statement is published to a third party (i.e., where it is read), and that "every repetition or republication of a defamatory statement constitutes a new publication", the practical result of Black and Banro is that whenever a plaintiff can demonstrate that at least one copy of an allegedly defamatory publication made its way into Ontario, or was read by someone on the Internet, Ontario courts will have presumptive jurisdiction over any non-resident defendant. Surprisingly, having stated such a broad rule, the Court did not engage in any analysis in Black or Banro as to how a defendant might displace the presumption in a future case.

In addition, the Court left "for another day" one of the most pressing questions impacting multi-jurisdictional defamation claims, namely what substantive law should be applied to determine the claim. Typically in Canada, the law to be applied in tort claims is that of the place of the tort (the lex loci delicti). In Banro, the Court left open the possibility of a new rule in defamation matters in the future. This issue remains unresolved, which adds to the uncertainty facing foreign defendants sued in Canadian defamation actions. This uncertainty is especially troubling in light of the very different defamation law principles in the United States, and that country's unique approach to foreign libel judgments. This will also require clarification soon.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
16 Oct 2018, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join Blakes lawyers for our 10th annual overview of recent legal and regulatory developments and practical strategies to navigate the changing regulation of Canada’s payments industry.

26 Oct 2018, Other, Vancouver, Canada

Cybersecurity, including data privacy and security obligations, has become a critical chapter in every company’s risk management playbook.

30 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for discussions on recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits as well as employment law issues.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
McCague Borlack LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
McCague Borlack LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions