Canada: Aboriginal Law @ Gowlings: April 17, 2012

Federal Court of Appeal Rules Income From First Nation Commercial Fishery is Exempt from Taxation

Decisions appear to confirm trend favouring application of Indian Act tax exemption

The Queen v. Robertson, 2012 FCA 94 and Ballantyne v. The Queen, 2012 FCA 95

Summary/Commentary

The Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) has released two important decisions involving First Nation fishers who had originally been assessed income tax on income earned from commercial fishing activities.  In both decisions, the FCA determined that the fishing income earned by the First Nation Appellants was the personal property of an Indian situated on a reserve and therefore exempt from taxation under s. 87 of the Indian Act.

These important decisions build upon the recent landmark rulings of the Supreme Court of Canada in Bastien v. The Queen and Dubé v. The Queen, which breathed new life into the s. 87 tax exemption after a two-decade decline. 

Importantly, the recent decisions confirm that Bastien and Dubé constituted a "restatement of the relevant law" and will have broad application.  The Federal Court of Appeal has underscored that Bastien and Dubé "reset the previous the analytical framework in some significant respects," noting in particular that the Supreme Court "rejected the 'commercial mainstream' principle as a basis for determining if property was situated on a reserve and the notion that the activities giving rise to the property must be linked to a traditional way of life."  The Court further stated that the Supreme Court has "firmly rejected the 'false opposition' between income earned in the 'commercial mainstream,' and that earned from an activity that was 'integral to the life of the reserve,'" and that "property can be both in the commercial mainstream and connected (or even integral) to a reserve at the same time." 

These two constructs – the "commercial mainstream" and "traditional way of life/integral to the life of the reserve" – are not found in the wording of s. 87 but were introduced by the courts into the s. 87 test. Over the last 20 years, they had come to supplant the exercise of determining the legal location of property, in favour of an exercise by which the courts assessed whether property was "in the commercial mainstream" as opposed to supporting a "traditional way of life."  Using this approach, property was routinely deemed to be off-reserve and taxable.  The approach -- which had been much-criticized by observers, practitioners and academics -- proceeded by assessing the nature of the property as opposed to its location.  The Supreme Court of Canada has now confirmed that this is incorrect, and that the focus must be on simply locating the property. Regardless of its nature, if property is on reserve, it is exempt from taxation.

The decisions of the Federal Court of Appeal are significant in several respects.  First, they appear to confirm that two factors – residence of the status Indian and the "traditional" nature of the activities giving rise to the income – cannot be used as a basis for denying the exemption, but nevertheless can help strengthen connections to a reserve and therefore the application of s. 87.  

These decisions do leave certain questions unanswered.  The Court noted that the source of income is "a very important indicator" as to whether the income is situated on a reserve, including locating the customers of the business.  It cites Williams and Bastien as authority for that proposition.  Yet in Dubé, the companion case to Bastien, the source of the capital invested was clearly not determinative as to the location of the resulting interest income, since its source was unknown and likely off-reserve.  Furthermore, Bastien and Dubé confirmed that general legal principles are relevant to determining location of property for the purposes of s. 87, and the Indian Act, like the Income Tax Act, does not exist in a vacuum.  In this regard, the location of a business' customers is generally not relevant to locating the business itself.  Rather, the general law looks to where the "central management and control" of the business occurs. 

The decisions appear to confirm a reversal of a longstanding trend over the last 20 years that had seen the scope of the s. 87 tax exemption narrowed to the point of its near disappearance.  Since the decisions in Bastien and Dubé were released in July 2011, four decisions have been rendered in relation to the s. 87 exemption.  Three of those decisions – one at the Tax Court level and two at the Federal Court of Appeal -- have applied the exemption.  In the previous 20 years, the Federal Court of Appeal had applied the exemption in only three instances.

Robertson

Mr. Robertson and Mr. Saunders are Indians within the meaning of section 2 of the Indian Act and members of the Norway House Reserve located on the south shore of Little Playgreen Lake in Manitoba.  During the taxation years in question, the Appellants were self-employed commercial fishers.  They owned fishing licenses and received fishing quotas through a Cooperative (Co-op).  In addition, the Appellants stored and maintained their boats on the Reserve.

The Appellants fished off Reserve and returned their catch at the end of the day to a Co-op owned packing station located close to the Norway House Reserve.  During the taxation years, the Co-op employed 52 members, most of whom lived on the Reserve.  In addition, the Co-op employed 160 Band members.  The Co-op purchased the catch from its members as an agent for a fishing corporation.  The First Nation fishers were paid weekly based on the receipts sent to the Co-op from the packing station.  The fishermen's wages were paid by the Co-op from funds provided by the fishing corporation which paid money into the Co-op's bank account to be held in trust for this purpose.  Fishers collected their weekly payments from the Co-op's administration office located on the Reserve.

As an agent to the fishing corporation, the Co-op was instrumental in assisting the Band members with most aspects of the fishing business including: providing loans for the purchase of boats; selling gas, oil, gear and nets; and receiving and dividing the fishing quotas managed by the provincial government.

Based on the above-noted facts, the trial judge held that the Appellants' income was situated on the Norway House Reserve and was therefore exempt from income tax under s. 87 of the Act.  The Tax Court judge ruled that the Minister of National Revenue wrongly included business income earned from commercial fishing and employment insurance benefits received from that fishing income.

The Crown appealed the Tax Court decision on the basis that the Appellant's income was not sufficiently connected to the Reserve to attract the protection of section 87.

FCA Analysis

The Federal Court of Appeal Court applied the analytical framework set out in Bastien and Dubé in order to determine the location of the Appellants' business income generated from fishing.  In doing so, the Court first reviewed the purpose of s. 87 and found that the statutory objective was limited to the personal property of an Indian situated on a Reserve and the property did not have to be integral to the life of the Reserve or to the preservation of the traditional Indian way of life.

While the Court acknowledged that s. 87 is not limited to income earned in the course of activities that could be characterized as integral to a First Nation's traditional way of life, in this case the close connections to the Reserve served to strengthen the connections between the Appellants' income and the Reserve.  Moreover, the Court determined that the fact that the fishing income earned by the Appellants was earned in the commercial mainstream, this did not weaken the connection of the income to the Reserve.  The Court confirmed that property held by an Indian can be "both in the commercial mainstream and connected (or even integral) to a Reserve at the same time."

The FCA determined that the location of the fishing business would largely determine the location of the income earned from it.  In locating the source of the Appellants' income, the Court divided the activities into two broad categories; fishing and selling fish.  The Court found that, even though fish were not caught on the Reserve, many of the activities associated with fishing were located on the reserve.  With respect to selling the fish, the Court acknowledged that the Appellants were aware that the fish they caught were eventually taken by the fishing corporation and sold to customers off-Reserve.  However, from the perspective of the fisherman, all of their business dealings were with the Co-op and therefore situated on Reserve.

Having considered all of the relevant factors, the Court concluded the role of the Co-op as an on-Reserve institution conducting fishing business for its members, most of which live on the Reserve, attached the Appellants' business activities to the Reserve, and therefore their income is exempt from taxation by virtue of s. 87.

The Court further found that the income earned from the employment insurance benefits was also situated on a Reserve because that was the situs of the qualifying activities.

Ballantyne

Mr. Ballantyne is a status Indian and a member of the Grand Rapids First Nation which is located on the shore of Lake Winnipeg in Manitoba.  The Tax Court trial judge originally determined that Mr. Ballantyne's fishing income was not situated on a Reserve and was therefore not exempt from tax under section 87 of the Act.  The Tax Court based its decision on the fact that Mr. Ballantyne sold his entire catch to a fish corporation located off Reserve and carried on his fishing activities in the commercial mainstream.

Similar to the material facts in Robertson, Mr. Ballantyne was a self-employed fisherman who primarily fished at an off-Reserve location.  Mr. Ballantyne was also a member of an on-Reserve Co-op which employed band members as staff.  The Co-op that Mr. Ballantyne worked for provided assistance to the First Nation community by way of loans and extending credit for fishing supplies.  A similar payment schedule for the catch and sale of fish was exercised, and the funds to pay the fisherman were also held as a trust by the Co-op.

The Court relied on its reasons in Robertson to find that Mr. Ballantyne's commercial fishing income was sufficiently connected to a Reserve to be tax exempt.  The Court also noted five differences in the two proceedings: unlike one of the Appellants in the Robertson decision, Mr. Ballantyne lived on Reserve; the fish packing stations used by Mr. Ballantyne were located on Reserve; and most of the time Mr. Ballantyne cleaned his fish on Reserve.  These factors were all determined to strengthen the connection between the Reserve and Mr. Ballantyne's fishing business income.

Finally, the Court noted that there was less historical evidence adduced in the Ballantyne proceedings but that would not ultimately affect the question of whether the fishing income was situated on a Reserve.  The Court also pointed out that Mr. Ballantyne personally owned the fishing quotas as opposed to the Robertson decision where the Co-op owned the quotas.  The Court weighed this factor and determined that all of the other circumstances established the necessary connection between Mr. Ballantyne's fishing income and the Reserve.

It was determined that Mr. Ballantyne's income was sufficiently located on a Reserve and the decision of the Tax Court was set aside and the matter was to be remitted to the Minister for reassessment.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions