The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) announced yesterday that, effective immediately, applications for the registration of trademarks consisting of sounds will be accepted. This announcement signals the reversal of long-standing CIPO policy and follows the recent order of the Federal Court in an appeal of CIPO's decision to refuse an application filed by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Lion Corp (MGM) to register its "Roaring Lion" sound mark. The Court's order, made with CIPO's consent, set aside CIPO's refusal and directed MGM to provide CIPO with a digital recording of the mark.
The application for the Roaring Lion sound mark (No. 714314) was advertised for opposition yesterday, and a recording of the sound mark can be accessed through a special section of the CIPO Trade-marks Database (a link to which is currently on the Database's home page). However, the Database cannot currently be searched for sound marks.
CIPO's Practice Notice of yesterday's date states that an application for the registration of a sound mark should: (1) state that it is for the registration of a sound mark, (2) contain a drawing that graphically represents the sound, (3) contain a description of the sound, and (4) contain an electronic recording of the sound. The electronic recording must be in MP3 or WAVE format, less than 5MB in size, and on a CD or DVD. Applications for sound marks may only be submitted by way of paper application. A sound mark considered to be functional and/or clearly descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive will be objected to under section 12(1)(b) of the Trade-marks Act (Act), but such an objection could be overcome by filing evidence showing that the sound mark has acquired distinctiveness.
CIPO had objected to the application for the Roaring Lion sound mark on the basis that it did not meet the requirements of section 30(h) of the Act, which requires that an application for registration of a trademark other than a word mark contain a drawing of the mark and "such number of accurate representations of the trademark as may be prescribed." CIPO had taken the position that non-visual marks could not be accurately represented by visual means such as drawings. However, CIPO has long been considering modernizing its treatment of non-traditional marks, and, in February 2012, asked for comments on proposed amendments to the Regulations accommodating the registration of sound and other non-traditional marks (which, we note, would not have addressed the hurdle created by section 30(h) of the Act.) The requirements for sound mark applications set out in yesterday's Practice Notice mirror the proposals with respect to sound marks. Given that any amendment to the Regulations may be months or years away, yesterday's announcement is welcome news for brand owners interested in protecting sound marks in Canada.
Brand owners that use sound marks or are considering adopting such marks are encouraged to contact us for further advice regarding the registration of such marks, and other implications of yesterday's announcement.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
