Canada: Your Contest May Not Be A Winner

Last Updated: March 20 2012
Article by James B. Musgrove, Daniel G. Edmondstone and Janine MacNeil

More than twelve years after Jean-Marc Richard received a direct mail promotional document from TIME magazine, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its ruling in a dispute that arose out of the type of marketing materials received by millions of Canadians.1 The decision deals specifically with the Quebec Consumer Protection Act (QCPA), but to have a Supreme Court ruling on the "general impression" test in determining whether advertising is false or misleading may influence interpretation of the Competition Act's misleading advertising provisions. The decision may also increase the use of consumer protection statutes in other provinces.

The direct mail advertisement was customized and said, amongst other things,

If you have and returned the Grand Prize winning entry in time and correctly answer a skill-testing question, we will officially announce that

OUR SWEEPSTAKES RESULTS ARE NOW FINAL:
MR. JEAN-MARC RICHARD HAS WON
A CASH PRIZE OF $833,337.00!.

There were a number of other similar passages in the document.

The sweepstakes rules were disclosed in full in the document itself. The odds of winning were set out as 1 in 126,000,000. The plaintiff was not a native speaker of English. His understanding, based on his own reading, as well as that of family members and co-workers, was that he was entitled to a large sum of money. He immediately subscribed to TIME magazine and returned the portion of the direct mail material designed for the purpose of entering the contest and subscribing to the magazine. When the large sum of money was not forthcoming, Mr. Richard made inquiries, and when turned down, launched a proceeding in the Superior Court of Quebec claiming that he was owed more than $1 million based on breach of contract and breach of the QCPA.

The making of a misleading representation by an advertiser is defined as a "prohibited practice" under the QCPA. The Superior Court found that it was sufficient for this analysis "to find that the average consumer, that is, one who is credulous and inexperienced, could be misled." The Superior Court held, among other things, that the fact that the recipient might not be the Grand Prize winner "at the very least had been buried in a sea of text." The judge stated:

It is patently obvious to any reader that the mailing from TIME was false and incomplete, it was specifically designed to be misleading, both in the words chosen, the size of the conditions or disclaimers and the ambiguity, especially to a person who is not reading in his or her mother tongue.

The Court awarded damages of $1000 with punitive damages of $100,000. The matter was appealed.

The Quebec Court of Appeal reversed, stating that "they could not conclude that the advertisement might give the average Quebec consumer the general impression that the recipient was the Grand Prize winner":

With respect, I see eye-catching text in the documentation sent to the [appellant], but I do not see misleading, under-handed or deceitful statements. I even suspect that the [appellant], a well informed businessman who worked locally and internationally in both French and English, understood the sweepstakes and his chance of winning perfectly well from the very start.

The case then went on appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. The Supreme Court decision deals in significant detail in matters of statutory interpretation relating to the QCPA. While the Court's analysis of the QCPA will be important for the law of Quebec, it may have an impact on cases both private and public under the Competition Act's misleading advertising provisions, as it deals with the "general impression" test and how the notional consumer is defined. These concepts, though arising under the QCPA, apply under the Competition Act as well. While it is not a certainty that the reasoning in this case will be adopted in future Competition Act cases, it will probably be argued to be relevant.

The relevant provision of the QCPA, section 218, requires that an advertising representation be evaluated based on "the general impression it gives, and, as the case may be, the literal meaning of the terms used therein [being taken] into account." This wording is very close to section 52(4) of the Competition Act,2 which provides that "In a prosecution for a contravention of this section, the general impression conveyed by a representation as well as its literal meaning shall be taken into account in determining whether or not the representation is false or misleading in a material respect."

The Supreme Court concluded that "general impression" under the QCPA is "that of the first impression." It is the impression "a person has after an initial contact with the entire advertisement, and it relates to both the layout of the advertisement and the meaning of the words used."

On the question of "who is the consumer," the Supreme Court used the same phrase as the Court of Appeal and of most decisions under the Competition Act: the "average consumer." The existing Quebec authority interpreting the QCPA held that the average consumer should be deemed to be "credulous and inexperienced." The Quebec Court of Appeal held that an average consumer also has "an average level of intelligence, skepticism and curiosity." The Supreme Court did not repeat this language but stated instead "in conformity with the objective of protection that underlies such legislation [i.e., consumer law], the courts have assumed that the average consumer is not very sophisticated." The Court then went on to use prior decisions involving trademarks as a good example of this interpretive approach. The standards for determining whether a trademark causes confusion is that the average consumers for such purposes are "ordinary hurried purchasers" and that "the standard is not that of people 'who never notice anything' but of persons who take no more than 'ordinary care to observe that which is staring them in the face'."

The Court explicitly rejected the "average consumer" having "an average level of intelligence, skepticism and curiosity" as "inconsistent with the letter and the spirit" of the QCPA.

The caselaw analyzed by the Supreme Court relies upon the "credulous man" test adopted in Imperial Tobacco,3 which was a prosecution under the Combines Investigation Act. Under the Combines Investigation Act and its successor, the Competition Act, this test has evolved significantly. The Court of Appeal for Ontario, in its 1975 decision in R v Viceroy Construction Company (1975),4 adopted the "average purchaser" test. This decision and its later decision in RM Lowe Real Estate Limited,5 the Court used the "average purchaser" test. The level of sophistication imputed to the "average purchaser" under the Competition Act analysis varies with respect to the type of product and the target audience. None of the more current caselaw under the Competition Act was discussed in the Supreme Court's ruling.

The Supreme Court's reasoning makes the "general impression" a much harsher test for the advertiser. It makes the advertiser responsible for ensuring that no consumer is misled. The Court of Appeal's inclusion of skepticism and curiosity did not weaken the general impression, rather it was part of the general impression.

For purposes of the QCPA, the Court found that where certain violations are committed by the merchant, it is no defence that the consumer suffered no prejudice. (It should be noted that damages under the Competition Act, including for violations of the misleading advertising provisions, only arise where actual harm has been suffered by the plaintiff.)

Under the Consumer Protection Act, 2002 of Ontario, the making of false, misleading or deceptive representations is deemed to be an "unfair practice." Similar to the Quebec statute, damages (including punitive damages) are available. Thus, if the Supreme Court's reasoning is applied to other consumer protection statutes, a right to nominal damages without the need to show prejudice to the consumer may become the basis for future class actions. These types of class actions exist now of course, but this decision will likely encourage more.

Footnotes

1 Richard v Time Inc, 2012 SCC 8.

2 The QCPA wording was based on a predecessor to section 52(4). It should also be noted that section 74.03(5) uses the same language with respect to the general impression test for the civil reviewable misleading advertising provision of the Competition Act.

3 R v Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd, 2011 SCC 42.

4 23 CPR (2d) 281.

5 39 CPR (2d) 366.

The foregoing provides only an overview. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, a qualified lawyer should be consulted.

© Copyright 2012 McMillan LLP

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
James B. Musgrove
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions