Canada: SCC Rules One-Year Delay Of Privacy Inquiry Reasonable

In Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. Alberta Teachers' Association, the Supreme Court of Canada (the Court) addressed the consequences of an administrative decision-maker, the Alberta Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner (the Commissioner), failing to comply with statutory time periods in the Alberta Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA).

The majority of the Court held that where an administrative decision-maker interprets or applies its home statute, it will be presumed that a reviewing court will apply a standard of reasonableness, subject to limited exceptions. In this case, the Commissioner was interpreting his home statute and his decision was therefore reviewable on a standard of reasonableness. As the Commissioner's interpretation of the time periods in PIPA was reasonable, the apparent failure to comply with those time periods did not justify quashing the Commissioner's decision.


In 2005, several individuals complained to the Commissioner that the Alberta Teachers' Association (the ATA) had disclosed their personal information in contravention of PIPA. In September 2006, the complainants made a written request to the Commissioner for an inquiry to be conducted.

At the time, s. 50(5) of PIPA stated:

An inquiry into a matter that is the subject of a written request ... must be completed within 90 days from the day that the written request was received by the Commissioner unless the Commissioner
  • notifies the person who made the written request, the organization concerned and any other person given a copy of the written request that the Commissioner is extending that period, and
  • provides an anticipated date for the completion of the review (emphasis added).

On August 1, 2007, nearly 11 months after the written request for an inquiry was submitted, the Commissioner informed the parties that he was extending the 90-day period set out in s. 50(5) of PIPA.

On March 13, 2008, the Commissioner's delegated adjudicator found that the ATA had disclosed personal information contrary to PIPA.

The ATA applied for judicial review of the adjudicator's decision and raised, for the first time, the issue that the Commissioner had lost jurisdiction for failing to comply with s. 50(5) of PIPA. On judicial review, the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench quashed the decision on the basis that the Commissioner had lost jurisdiction. The Alberta Court of Appeal upheld this decision of the Court of Queen's Bench.

Standard of Review

The main issue addressed by the Court was whether the Commissioner's inquiry automatically terminated as a result of the Commissioner's failure to extend the 90-day period in s. 50(5) of PIPA within that period. The Court considered whether the Commissioner's decision regarding the time periods in s. 50(5) should be given deference and reviewed on a standard of reasonableness, or whether it should be reviewed on a standard of correctness.

The majority judgment was delivered by Rothstein J. (McLachlin C.J., LeBel, Fish, Abella and Charron JJ. concurring). Justice Rothstein discussed the uncertainty surrounding the applicable standard of review and the confusion both counsel and judges faced, and held that a standard of reasonableness is to be presumed when an administrative decision-maker interprets or applies its home statute. Justice Rothstein held, however, that this presumption could be rebutted if a party could demonstrate that a "true question of jurisdiction" existed. Justice Rothstein discussed that he was unable to define what might constitute a true question of jurisdiction and that the onus was on counsel to satisfy a court that a true question of jurisdiction existed in a particular case.

Justice Rothstein noted that a standard of correctness would always apply, even when a tribunal is interpreting or applying its home statute, when an issue is:

  • a constitutional question;
  • a question of central importance to the legal system as a whole and is outside the adjudicator's expertise; or
  • a question regarding the jurisdictional lines between competing specialized tribunals.

The Commissioner's decision regarding the timelines in s. 50(5) of PIPA involved the interpretation of the Commissioner's home statute. As the issue involved neither a true question of jurisdiction, nor one to which the standard of correctness would automatically apply, Rothstein J. held that the applicable standard of review was reasonableness.

Reasonableness of Commissioner's Decision

As the timelines issue was first raised on judicial review, the issue was neither directly considered by the Commissioner nor his delegated adjudicator. Justice Rothstein discussed that while the general rule was that judicial review would not be granted on an issue that was not raised before an administrative decision-maker, the Commissioner had made an implied decision regarding s. 50(5) when the inquiry was extended after the 90-day period had elapsed: failure to extend the inquiry within 90 days did not result in a loss of jurisdiction.

Rothstein J. reviewed previous decisions of the Commissioner, holding that those decisions provided consistent reasons to establish a reasonable basis for the Commissioner's implied interpretation of s. 50(5) of PIPA. Justice Rothstein held that it could be assumed that the reasons issued in past decisions of the Commissioner would have been the reasons of the adjudicator in the current case had the time periods issue been directly raised.

Justice Rothstein held that the Commissioner's interpretation that s. 50(5) of PIPA permitted an extension of an inquiry beyond 90 days was reasonable, in part, because:

  • the wording "within 90 days" only refers to the duty to complete the inquiry, not the power to extend that period;
  • the purpose of this provision – keeping parties informed and involved in the inquiry process – was still
  • fulfilled when an extension was granted after 90 days; and
  • the practical realities of completing an inquiry can make it impossible for adequate notice to be provided before the expiry of 90 days.

As there was a reasonable basis for the Commissioner's interpretation of s. 50(5) of PIPA, Rothstein J. restored the Commissioner's original order.


Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. Alberta Teachers' Association clearly establishes that a reviewing court will give deference to the decisions of the commissioners regarding managing the process under their enabling statute. That deference will most certainly apply to the decisions of commissioners in other provinces operating under similar statutes. In many provinces, access requests, requests for review and the applicable inquiry process under both private-sector and public-sector privacy statutes takes much longer than the timelines specified in the home statute which can make filing privacy complaints cumbersome in the circumstances. Provided, however, that the applicable commissioner has come to a reasonable basis for any decision to extend timelines, there will likely be very little a member of the public can do to have that decision reviewed since a court will not overturn the decision, except in the limited circumstances described by the Supreme Court of Canada.

In order to successfully quash a decision of a privacy commissioner, an applicant must either:

1. Establish that the appropriate standard of review is correct by persuading a reviewing court that the question is:

  • a "true question of jurisdiction";
  • a constitutional question;
  • a question of central importance to the legal system as a whole and is outside the adjudicator's expertise; or
  • a question regarding the jurisdictional lines between competing specialized tribunals,

and persuade that court that the commissioner did not come to the correct decision; or

2. Establish that there is no reasonable basis for the decision of the commissioner.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
26 Oct 2018, Other, Vancouver, Canada

Cybersecurity, including data privacy and security obligations, has become a critical chapter in every company’s risk management playbook.

30 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for discussions on recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits as well as employment law issues.

12 Nov 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Stories aren’t falsehoods. Stories are the root of all effective human communications: they motivate, animate and clarify. If you aren’t telling stories, you probably aren’t getting your point across.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions