ARTICLE
14 March 2012

Carbon Tax vs. Environmental Regulations

SE
Stikeman Elliott LLP

Contributor

Stikeman Elliott LLP logo
Stikeman Elliott is a global leader in Canadian business law and the first call for businesses working in and with Canada. We provide clients with the highest quality counsel, strategic advice, and creative solutions. Stikeman Elliott consistently ranks as a top law firm in our primary practice areas. www.stikeman.com
The Conservative government has rejected the proposal for a carbon tax in favour of the United States’ model of regulating emissions through environmental regulations.
Canada Environment

The Conservative government has rejected the proposal for a carbon tax in favour of the United States' model of regulating emissions through environmental regulations.

Energy industry critics and environmental groups have endorsed the carbon tax model citing the high bureaucratic involvement and low flexibility of regulations, and arguing that a market-based approach minimizes administrative costs and maximizes mechanisms to price the cost of greenhouse gases. Supporting these arguments, a paper prepared by Nancy Olewiler, released by the University of Calgary, recommends the federal government institute a carbon tax as part of a full-cost pricing system.

The author will be presenting her views to the Natural Resources Minister on March 9, 2012, suggesting further pressure on Ottawa to choose taxation over regulation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More