Canada: Latest Step In CRA’s New Audit Approach: "Risk Assessment" Interviews With Large Businesses

Last Updated: February 21 2012
Article by Patrick Lindsay and Salvatore Mirandola

Most Read Contributor in Canada, September 2016


In the next few weeks, the Canada Revenue Agency ("CRA") plans to conduct individual risk-assessment interviews with a select group of 50 large businesses. These taxpayers face the prospect of being labelled "high-risk," a designation that will likely come with significant costs related to increased audit scrutiny.

It is important for potential interviewees to understand what to expect from this process, and what their rights are, in order to prepare for the interview and determine the most effective way to participate.


The interviews are part of the CRA's new approach to large business audits. Instead of assigning audits based on a taxpayer's gross income,1 the CRA intends to select audits based on "risk". At the interviews, the CRA is expected to:

  • Explain its new audit approach;
  • Provide information regarding its initial risk assessment of the taxpayer and identify issues of concern for the next audit cycle; and
  • Ask for information regarding the taxpayer's own assessment of its tax risks.

The interviews are part of the first phase of the new risk-based audit approach, which is being introduced gradually over five years. Within five years, the CRA plans to meet with all large file taxpayers to discuss their risk categorization.


Letters issued to the selected taxpayers request a meeting to discuss items including "the potential benefits of adopting an engaged approach to compliance." The letter attaches a proposed list of questions for taxpayers, which include:

  • How are your tax risks identified, managed, reported and monitored? What are the names of the individuals involved in this process?
  • Will you disclose your own analysis of your tax risks?
  • Do you have a tax risk management committee? Who is on the committee? Will you provide meeting minutes?
  • Describe a situation where you were not compliant and explain what you did.
  • Do you use external tax planners? Are any paid on a contingency basis?

The questions invite taxpayers to disclose their own analysis of their tax risks. While most taxpayers have no issue providing the CRA with all records necessary to test the honesty and accuracy of their tax returns, it can be expected that many will take issue with disclosing their own mental impressions regarding their tax risks.


Taxpayers that participate in the interviews should prepare by:

  • Reviewing the CRA interview request letter and carefully considering the questions attached to the letter;
  • Discussing the scope of the CRA's authority to compel answers to the questions and decide in advance how much information to provide at the meeting;
  • Reviewing the internal processes for assessing tax risk and consider what information the CRA could compel the taxpayer to produce;
  • Considering which individuals should attend, what materials to bring to the meeting, if any, and who will take meeting minutes; and
  • Preparing questions for the CRA regarding the new risk assessment audit process including the benefits, costs, and specific changes the taxpayer can expect.

The most likely area for disconnect between the taxpayer and the CRA involves how much information the taxpayer should provide regarding its own assessment of its tax risks. As such, we discuss below:

  • perspectives of the CRA and taxpayers on this issue;
  • the scope of the CRA's authority to compel taxpayers to produce records; and
  • the impact of the CRA's request for taxpayer's own tax risk assessments.


The CRA's position is that taxpayers are obligated to disclose "concerns with regard to tax at risk" to assist the CRA to "identify audit issues".2 In other words, taxpayers must self-audit and disclose results to the CRA. The extent to which the CRA can compel disclosure of a taxpayer's own assessment of tax risks has not been tested in Canada. In the United States, the Internal Revenue Service has taken court action against taxpayers that declined to disclose such information, with mixed results.3

From the CRA's perspective, the audit process would be more effective and cost-efficient if taxpayers simply disclosed their own assessment of their tax risks; "The CRA's goal is to develop a useful and cost-effective program to better target its compliance efforts."4


Tax litigation is inseparable from the audit process because information gathered during an audit can be used against taxpayers in litigation. The CRA litigates tax issues regularly using the largest law firm in the country, the Department of Justice. As such, any requests for information from the CRA need to be considered knowing that the CRA has a dual role as both auditor and adversary.


Under the CRA's primary audit power, it has broad authority to "inspect, audit or examine the books and records of a taxpayer".5 This authority is necessary for the CRA to carry out the purpose for which it exists – assessing taxpayer's accuracy and honesty within a self-assessment system. This authority imposes obligations on taxpayers to:

  • maintain and disclose proper books and records;
  • provide "all reasonable assistance"; and
  • answer "all proper questions".6

Taxpayers should be aware that the CRA frequently asks for information that it cannot compel taxpayers to provide. For example, the CRA often requests access to legal opinions that are protected from disclosure by solicitor-client privilege.7 The CRA also requests information for the purpose of auditing unnamed persons (for example, a client list), even though the CRA has no authority to demand such information without judicial authorization.8 Taxpayers should consider the limits of the CRA's authority when considering an information request. Since "risk-assessment" interviews are a new process and the scope of the compliance obligation is unclear, we expect considerable discussion between the CRA and taxpayers regarding the appropriate level of disclosure.


Limitations on the CRA's authority to compel taxpayers to produce records include:

  • solicitor-client privilege;
  • purpose;
  • reasonability; and
  • relevance.

Each limitation is discussed briefly below.


The most important limitation on the CRA's ability to compel the production of information is solicitor-client privilege. Accountants and other professionals do not have this protection, and the CRA has made it clear that it can and will demand to see accountants' working papers and similar tax-related documentation where it chooses to do so.9

The current interviews are part of gradual changes in CRA audit practices that have evolved over the past several years. In response to these changes, many taxpayers have organized their tax risk assessment process so that many records are subject to solicitor-client privilege. In such cases, the taxpayers cannot be compelled to produce records that are properly subject to privilege. In some cases, privilege other than traditional solicitor-client privilege may apply, such as where legal advice is sought in anticipation of litigation.

Where taxpayers assert privilege, the CRA may request sufficient information in order to assess whether they wish to challenge the privilege claim. The focus in such privilege disputes is often: (i) whether the records at issue were produced as part of a solicitor-client relationship; and (ii) where privileged records were provided to a third party, whether privilege was waived.

Most large businesses consider how to manage their information flow so as to create and preserve solicitor-client privilege where possible. The CRA interview questions directed at accessing the taxpayers' own tax risks assessment are likely to result in large businesses analysing their process for identifying tax-risks and considering whether that process should be modified so that solicitor-client privilege applies to more records.


The CRA exists to verify taxpayers' accuracy and honesty within a self-assessing system, which is a distinctly "regulatory" function. The powers granted to CRA are limited to the carrying out of this regulatory function, as opposed to a policing or legislative function.

The CRA has, on occasion, tried to use its regulatory powers to carry out a policing function. In these cases, where the CRA demands records for the primary purpose of advancing a criminal investigation (i.e., tax evasion), the CRA has no authority to compel a response. Courts have confirmed that CRA's regulatory powers are not available where the CRA is carrying out a different function.10 Similarly, CRA document demands that are primarily directed at impeding a particular business activity have been overturned on the basis that they do not come within the "purpose" test of the CRA's regulatory powers.11


Any CRA request must provide a reasonable time to comply.12 In addition to challenging the reasonableness of the time given to comply, taxpayers may challenge the reasonableness of the number, scope and availability of the documents requested. Often CRA requests are necessarily over-broad because the CRA does not have the benefit of knowing what records the taxpayer maintains. Where the scope is perceived as unreasonably broad, discussions with the CRA are needed to try to reach a suitable compromise.

Where the CRA compels the production of records, such demand is a "seizure" within the meaning of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.13 Since the Charter prohibits seizures that are "unreasonable", any requests must be reasonable in order to be enforceable. The vast majority of the CRA's requests for information are clearly reasonable. For example, a request for documents or information necessary to complete an audit is clearly reasonable. A demand to disclose a summary of potential uncertainties in one's tax filings may be considered unreasonable.


The CRA is granted authority to "administer and enforce the Act".14 As such, the CRA can only compel the production of records or information relevant to this purpose. In the vast majority of cases, relevance is clear and the CRA is entitled to the information requested. However, where relevance is unclear, it is important to consider whether this relatively low threshold is met. Where disputed, the Minister need only show that the requested records "may be relevant".15

Taxpayers may question the extent to which their own mental impressions are "relevant". The CRA's job is to gather the necessary factual information and to form its own view as to whether the law has been complied with. Where the CRA has been provided with all of the information necessary to form that view as to the accuracy of the taxpayer's returns as filed, it is not obvious that the taxpayer's own impressions are "relevant" to the administration or enforcement of the Act. This question has not yet been considered by a Canadian court.


There is an important public policy reason for large businesses to carefully and thoroughly analyse their tax risk. We all recall when public confidence in financial reporting collapsed after the bankruptcy of Enron and others. To rebuild public confidence, reporting issuers faced more stringent financial reporting standards, including an obligation to increase the quality and quantity of records related to the calculation of tax risk.

The records that the CRA now seeks include records generated in connection with the public policy goal of ensuring large businesses accurately calculate tax risks such that the financial statements accurately depict the financial position of the business. In order to calculate tax at risk, taxpayers must consider the strengths and weaknesses of their legal position, including the strength of witnesses and other evidence in the event that uncertain issues are litigated.

If the CRA can access records related to a taxpayer's own risk assessment, the quality and quantity of records maintained in connection with internal tax risk will decline. As noted by the United States Court of Appeal, if tax advisors who identify "uncertainties in their clients' tax returns know that putting such information in writing will result in discovery by the IRS, they will be more likely to avoid putting it in writing, thus diminishing the quality of representation. [Access to the records by the IRS] will have ramifications that will affect the form and detail of documents" prepared when assessing tax risks.16 The same considerations apply in Canada and the extent to which the CRA can access taxpayer records will impact the manner in which such records are prepared and maintained.


1 Currently, taxpayers with gross income exceeding $250 million are assigned a large case file manager and a team of auditors who together complete an annual audit. Taxpayers with gross income from $20 million to $250 million are selected for audit based on a complexity rating and are assigned to a single auditor.

2 Canada Revenue Agency Technical Statement "Acquiring Information from Taxpayers, Registrants and Third Parties," June 2, 2010, , at para 5.

3 See, for example: U.S. v. Deloitte LLP, 2010 WL 2572965 (D.C. Cir. June 29, 2010) and v. Textron Inc., 577 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 2010 WL 2025148 (May 24, 2010). Many corporations in the United States with assets in excess of $100 million must file a schedule identifying uncertain tax positions, see:

4 Canada Revenue Agency, Income Tax Technical News No. 34, (April 27, 2006), available at

5 Section 231.1 of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the "Act").

6 Sections 230, 231.1 and 231.2 of the Act.

7 Boilerplate language used in requirements issued by the CRA often includes a request for legal opinions (without notice to taxpayers that privilege may apply) and contains a caution that criminal prosecution may occur if the requested information is not disclosed.

8 Subsection 231.2(2). The CRA can generally compel such information to be produced after obtaining judicial authorization: Artistic Ideas v. Canada, [2005] 2 CTC 25 (FCA).

9 See, for example, Suarez, "Canada Updates Policy on Accessing Working Papers," Tax Notes International, Vol. 55, no. 3, July 20, 2009 at p. 172.

10 See for example: R. v. Jarvis, [2003] 1 CTC 135 (SCC) and R. v. Ling, [2002] SCR 214.

11 See for example: M.N.R. v. RBC Life Insurance Company et al., 2011 FC 1249 at para. 62 where J. Tremblay-Lamar writes: "It was not open to the Minister to seek ex parte authorization under the pretence of verifying compliance with the Act when her true purpose was to achieve through audits what the Department of Finance refused to do through legislative amendment."

12 Subsection 231.2(1) of the Act. See also R. v. MacDonald, [2005] 5 CTC 77 (BC PC).

13 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982 being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.), 1982, c. 11, s. 8.

14 Sections 231.1 and 231.2 of the Act.

15 See for example: 1144020 Ontario Ltd. v. M.N.R., [2005] 3 CTC 310 (FCTD) and Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP v. M.N.R., [2002] 4 CTC 210 (FCTD).

16 U.S. v. Textron Inc., 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 1538, at p 36-37.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.