Canada: Case Comment: T A & K Enterprises Inc. v. Suncor Energy Products Inc. and Suncor Energy Inc.

Last Updated: December 6 2011
Article by Sarah J. Armstrong and Zohaib I. Maladwala

The recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in T A & K Enterprises Inc. v. Suncor Energy Products Inc. and Suncor Energy Inc. will be viewed positively by defendants in class actions, and particularly defendant franchisors, in light of a recent spate of class actions against franchisors in Ontario regarding franchise disclosure requirements. In T A & K, the Ontario Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the lower court decision of Justice Perell dismissing the plaintiff's summary judgment motion on behalf of the proposed class and granting summary judgment in favour of the defendant franchisor. The proposed class action against Suncor Energy Products Inc. and Suncor Energy Inc. (collectively "Suncor") was one of a number of recent franchise class actions brought against an array of franchisors regarding the disclosure requirements under Ontario's Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000, S.O. 2000, c.3 (the "Wishart Act").


The Suncor decision is significant for a number of reasons:

  1. in the franchise law and franchise class actions context, the decision provides clarity on the exemptions to disclosure requirements listed in the Wishart Act;
  2. the Ontario Court of Appeal has now confirmed that royalties and service/imaging fees will most likely not be considered a "franchise fee" under the Wishart Act; and
  3. the decision is also noteworthy because of its interpretation of the revised summary judgment rule in the 2010 amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure. Although we continue to wait for the Court of Appeal to deliver rulings directly interpreting the revised summary judgment rule, the Suncor decision suggests that courts in Ontario may be more willing to consider summary judgment motions in class actions in which the central issue is one of contractual or statutory interpretation, there is an adequate evidentiary record and there are no serious issues surrounding credibility.


The putative representative plaintiff, T A & K Enterprises ("TAK") entered into a series of one-year franchise agreements with Suncor to operate a gas station under the Sunoco banner.  The most recent of TAK's franchise agreements covered the period between November 15, 2008 and November 14, 2009.  TAK and the other members of the proposed class did not pay Suncor a fee to become a Sunoco franchise, but were required to pay royalties to Suncor, as well as additional fees for imaging and training. Suncor did not deliver a disclosure document to TAK or any of the proposed class members prior to the signing of their franchise agreements.

In the summer of 2009, a few months before the expiry of its 08/09 franchise agreements, Suncor merged with Petro Canada. To ensure that the merger did not run afoul of Canada's competition laws, the Commissioner of Competition required the newly amalgamated corporation to divest 194 retail gas stations in Ontario. Consequently, in October 2009, Suncor announced that it would not offer its current franchisees new one-year agreements when the 08/09 agreements expired in November 2009, and instead would extend the franchise agreements on a month-to-month basis following the end of their respective terms. In January 2010, Suncor delivered termination notices to approximately 125 franchisees, including TAK, advising them that their franchise agreements would terminate in seven months time. After receiving the termination notice, TAK sent Suncor a notice of rescission and served notice of the proposed class action.

Disclosure Requirements under the Wishart Act

Section 5 of the Wishart Act requires that all franchisors deliver a disclosure document to a prospective franchisee not less than 14 days before the earlier of (i) the signing of the franchise agreement or other agreement related to the franchise; or (ii) the payment of any consideration by or on behalf of the prospective franchise to the franchisor or franchisor's associate relating to the franchise. However, the section also provides for exemptions from the requirement to deliver a disclosure document in specific circumstances. One of the exemptions, central in this case, is if "the franchise agreement is not valid for longer than one year and does not involve the payment of a non-refundable franchise fee". However, the Wishart Act does not define the terms "valid" or "franchise fee".

If a franchisor does not meet one of the listed exemptions in section 5 and fails to provide a disclosure document to a franchisee, section 6(2) of the Wishart Act allows the franchisee to rescind the franchise agreement without penalty or obligation within two years of entering into the agreement. Upon such a rescission, the franchisor is obligated to make payments to the franchisee to compensate it for any expenses and losses that the franchisee incurred as a consequence of setting up the franchise. Under section 7 of the Wishart Act, the franchisee also maintains a right of action for damages against the franchisor, its broker, agent and/or associate if a disclosure document is not provided.

The Parties' Positions

In an attempt to obtain a swift result, both sides moved for summary judgment under the revised summary judgment rule in the 2010 amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure.

TAK sought a summary declaration that Suncor breached its obligations under section 5 of the Wishart Act, by failing to deliver a disclosure document to each of its franchisees prior to the signing of their most recent franchise agreements. Accordingly, on behalf of the Sunoco franchisees, TAK sought to obtain the option to rescind their franchise agreement with Suncor and claim up to $200 million in damages.

TAK submitted that certain isolated and recurring fees paid to Suncor by its franchisees, including royalties, customer service dues, fees for store imaging and training program fees, constitute a "franchise fee" under the Wishart Act. TAK also argued that the agreement was "valid" for longer than one-year by virtue of the fact that the franchise agreement was signed a few days before it actually came into force on November 15, 2008 and continued until November 14, 2009. Alternatively, TAK argued that the franchise agreement was "valid" for longer than one-year after its month-to-month extension in October 2009. In the further alternative, TAK also relied on a specific term of the franchise agreement, which permitted it to continue operating as a Sunoco franchise on a month-month basis if TAK remained in possession of the store after expiry of the franchise agreement, as proof that the agreement was "valid" for longer than one-year.

Suncor moved to have the action dismissed in its entirety, on the grounds that a disclosure document was not required. Suncor contended that its franchise agreement with TAK and the other class members fell under the exemption listed in section 5(7)(g)(ii), which exempts a franchisor from providing a disclosure document if the franchise agreement is not "valid" for more than one year and does not involve the payment of a non-refundable franchise fee. Suncor also relied on a second exemption under the Wishart Act which exempted a franchisor from providing a disclosure document where there was a renewal or extension of a franchise agreement with no interruption in the operation of the franchisee's business and no material change since the previous franchise agreement.

The Motions Judge's Decision

At the outset, Justice Perell held that "there are no genuine issues that require a trial" and accepted both parties' submission that he, as a motions judge, was "in as good a position as a trial judge to decide this matter."

Justice Perell then went on to consider the exemptions listed under section 5(7) of the Wishart Act.  With respect to the definition of "franchise fee", Justice Perell rejected TAK's submission that any payment from a franchisee to franchisor, including dues, fees and royalties is a "franchise fee" under the Act. He held that "a franchise fee means a direct or indirect payment to obtain the right to purchase a franchise, to operate a franchised business, or to become a franchisee in a franchise chain." With this definition in mind, Justice Perell found that Suncor's franchise agreement did not impose a non-refundable franchise fee upon its franchisees, and consequently the first element of the exemption in section 5(7)(g)(ii) of the Wishart Act was met.

Justice Perell also rejected TAK's arguments on the term of its franchise agreement. The motions' judge held that the duration of an agreement was the defined term within which the rights and obligations of the parties were operational. Although a party is not precluded from bringing an action for anticipatory breach prior to the commencement of the actual term of an agreement, the enforceable and operational rights and obligations in a franchise agreement only exist for the duration of its term, which in Suncor's case was November 15, 2008 to November 14, 2009. Consequently the agreement was not "valid" for longer than one year according to Justice Perell.

Justice Perell also rejected TAK's alternative arguments that Suncor's option and decision to extend the franchise agreement on a month-to-month basis precluded it from relying on the s.5(7)(g)(ii) exemption. As Suncor was not obligated to extend or offer a new franchise agreement to TAK at the time the agreement was entered into, Justice Perell found that TAK could not rely on events or circumstances that occurred after the signing of the agreement to argue that Suncor was now unable to rely on the s.5(7)(g)(ii) exemption. To accept such an argument would practically render the s.5(7)(g)(ii) exemption ineffective, as the possibility of a future extension of the franchise agreement by the franchisor always exists. 

The Court of Appeal Decision

The Court of Appeal unanimously adopted Justice Perell's findings with regards to the exemption listed in s.5(7)(g)(ii) and dismissed TAK's appeal.

The Court accepted that the duration of the franchise agreement was twelve months even though it had been executed before the start of its term. The Court of Appeal also rejected TAK's suggestion that the franchise agreement remained 'valid' for longer than one-year because the indemnity and confidentiality provisions in the agreement survived the termination or expiration of the agreement. The relevant consideration was the length of the enforceable grant of a franchise, not the fact that other provisions in the agreement survived for longer. The Court unanimously rejected TAK's argument that the possibility of an extension at the time the agreement was entered into extends the duration of the agreement, holding that "a section that merely creates the possibility of a month-to-month tenancy after the [franchise agreement] expires cannot be taken to extend it." The Court added that the October 2009 letter extending the franchise agreements on a monthly basis created new monthly agreements following the expiry of the franchise agreement, and did not extend the prior agreement.

Finally, the court expressly rejected TAK's assertion that royalties constitute franchise fees. Instead, the court agreed with Justice Perell and held that "a franchise fee is in the nature of a fee paid for the right to become a franchisee. It does not include royalties or payments for goods and services."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.