Canada: Interpreting Standards Of Proof And Review In Health Law

Last Updated: December 13 2011
Article by Cynthia B. Kuehl

Originally published in The Lawyers Weekly

Health law litigators are well-versed in the language of "standard of care." However, in 2008, the Supreme Court of Canada released two decisions on the "other" standards — standard of review and standard of proof — that are relevant to those who practise before administrative tribunals.

In Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, [2008] S.C.J. No. 9, the Supreme Court attempted to simplify the law on standard of review by creating a single standard of "reasonableness" for reviewing issues of fact, discretion and policy, thereby eliminating the confusing "patent unreasonableness" standard.

Deference, which imports the notion of respect both for the legislative decision to grant powers to administrative tribunals and for the decisions of those tribunals, is the underlying principle of the reasonableness standard. The court, however, will continue to review jurisdictional, constitutional and most legal issues on a correctness standard.

While the reasonableness standard is not new to the health law field, the practical implication of the Dunsmuir articulation of the standard has yet to be fully addressed. Fortunately, some guidance has been provided in the recent Ontario Divisional Court decision in Yar v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, [2009] O.J. No. 1017.

In Yar, the court relied on previous decisions establishing that, on judicial review, the reasons of the tribunal as a whole must be evaluated. Like the palpable and overriding error test for reviewing findings of fact made by a trial judge, individual errors or mistakes by a tribunal will not necessarily result in the decision being found unreasonable unless they affect the overall conclusion.

Following Dunsmuir, the court in Yar noted that there is often a range of acceptable and rational outcomes from a tribunal that can be defended on the evidence and the law. While the court in Dunsmuir noted that reasonableness is "concerned mostly with the existence of justification, transparency and intelligibility with the decision-making process," it also stated that, on judicial review, a court should consider whether the tribunal's decision falls within that range of possible outcomes. If it does, it will likely be found to be a reasonable decision.

One can compare Yar, in which the tribunal's decision was upheld, to Dr. V.L. v. College of Chiropractors of Ontario, 2008 CanLii 56709, in which the Divisional Court quashed the college's decision as unreasonable. There, the issue was whether a chiropractor, who had an existing intimate relationship with the complainant before she became a patient, was guilty of sexual abuse. The court reviewed whether the treatment was "incidental" to the relationship and found that the college's interpretation of "incidental," as referable to frequency of treatment, was unreasonable.

Applying the language from Dunsmuir quoted in Yar, this decision arguably either means that the college's interpretation was not within the range of defensible outcomes or that this question lent itself only to one specific result. Leave to appeal has been granted.

In addition to the effect of Dunsmuir on future judicial review applications, the recent statement on standard of proof by the Supreme Court in F.H. v McDougall, [2008] S.C.J. No. 54 will affect future tribunal decisions at first instance. Since the Divisional Court's decision in Bernstein v. CPSO, [1977] O.J. No. 2182, the standard of proof for matters involving professional misconduct has required that the evidence be "clear, cogent and convincing."

The premise of the "Bernstein standard" was that the potential impact on career and reputation was so serious that the evidence must meet a certain, arguably heightened, standard. In F.H., the Supreme Court appears to try to eliminate that interpretation of Bernstein by clearly stating that there is a single standard of proof, namely balance of probabilities, for all civil cases, including cases in which the allegations are of professional misconduct.

Rather than reject the requirement of clear, cogent and convincing evidence, the court integrated it, finding that regardless of the nature of the civil case, evidence "must always be sufficiently clear, convincing and cogent to satisfy the balance of probabilities test." The decision finds it inappropriate to have different levels of scrutiny of the evidence depending on the gravity of the allegations.

While the Supreme Court specifically rejects any formulation of standard of proof other than balance of probabilities, the application of the balance of probabilities test will not happen in a factual vacuum. Thus, tribunals will inevitably consider whether the potential outcomes to the health professional are relevant to the consideration of whether the evidentiary threshold is met.

In the year ahead, courts and tribunals will need to integrate the "other" standards into their decisions and, in doing so, determine whether the effects of Dunsmuir and F.H. will change the existing law or, in the health law context, amount only to a restatement of it.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Cynthia B. Kuehl
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions