Canada: Asset Acquisitions In Ontario: Buying Liability In Bulk

Last Updated: January 3 2012
Article by Peter Moffatt

Ontario's Bulk Sales Act poses a challenge to investors who want to acquire an Ontario business investor who is considering the acquisition of a business based in Ontario, Canada, and the attorneys who are advising such an investor, need to be aware of the application of Ontario's Bulk Sales Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. B.14 (BSA).

Bulk sales legislation, including the BSA, has its roots in English law and historically was common in many jurisdictions in North America. Today, Ontario is one of the few remaining jurisdictions in North America, and the only jurisdiction in Canada, which still has bulk sales legislation in force. Several jurisdictions in the US, including California, Georgia, Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia, continue to have bulk sales legislation in force, and additional jurisdictions in the US, while no longer having in force bulk sales legislation of general application, have bulk sale notification provisions embedded in their taxing statutes.

The primary reason cited for the repeal of bulk sales legislation in jurisdictions of Canada other than Ontario is, in the words of the Supreme Court of Canada, that bulk sales legislation achieves its goals "only at the cost of significant commercial inconvenience, disruption and expense": National Trust Co. v. H&R Block Canada Inc., [2003] 3 S.C.R. 160, at para 8 (H&R Block). The purpose of this article is to describe the types of transactions to which the BSA may apply and to provide insight into how to overcome BSA compliance issues.

Application: Every Sale in Bulk

The BSA is broad in its application. It applies to every sale of stock in bulk (BSA, section 2) that is "out of the usual course of business or trade of the seller" (BSA, section 1, definition of "sale in bulk"). The BSA broadly defines "stock" as either goods or inventory that a seller disposes of out of the usual course of business, or goods, fixtures and chattels that the seller uses to operate its business (BSA, section 1, definition of "stock"). On the basis of the foregoing, it can be the context of a sale of all or part of a business, as such a sale would not be considered a sale in the ordinary course of business. Once it is determined that the BSA applies, a buyer will have to consider how to deal with compliance with the BSA.

The BSA may also apply when intangible assets are the subject matter of the acquisition. This is the case where the sale of a major intangible asset is coupled with the sale of tangible assets. For example, in Excelsior Brands Ltd. v. Itafina et al. (1995), 24 O.R. (3d) 801 (Ont. Gen. Div.), a company sold a trade-mark along with packaging inventory and supplies. The court found that the subject sale fell within the scope of the BSA. As a result, the parties to the transaction should have complied with the BSA.

As is clear from the meaning of a "sale in bulk," the BSA has a broad scope and therefore plays a significant role in the context of asset acquisitions in Ontario. One difficult issue the legislation causes for most buyers is that the legislation places responsibility for compliance on the buyer to ensure that the seller's trade creditors are either paid out in full on all their debts or waive compliance for their debt as part of the transaction. By placing this onus on the buyer, the BSA increases the scope of the buyer's obligations and risks, and also increases the buyer's costs of completing the transaction.

Purpose: Protection of Trade Creditors

The purpose of the BSA is to protect the interests of trade creditors. This legislation aims to prevent a situation where a seller quietly disposes of its assets and then quickly slips away, leaving creditors with the task of chasing down the debts owed to them. By placing the onus on the buyer to ensure that trade creditors are paid, the BSA attempts to decrease the likelihood that trade creditors will have to chase their unpaid debts.

Protection: At What Cost?

The public policy motive that drove the creation of the BSA is sensible – protect the vulnerable interests of trade creditors. Unfortunately, the execution of this policy may have harsh consequences on buyers in asset acquisitions, as buyers may be subject to financial penalties. Where the parties to a transaction fail to comply with the BSA and a trade creditor has not been paid, a trade creditor can apply to the court and obtain judgment against the buyer (BSA, sections 16(1) and 17(1)). Therefore, if a buyer purchases the assets of an existing business and the proceeds of the sale are insufficient to satisfy all of the "creditors" of the seller, which is often the case, any creditor who has not been paid in full and has not waived payment may apply to the court for relief under the BSA. If the application is successful, the court has the power to set aside the sale of assets and impose personal liability on the buyer (BSA, sections 16(1) and (2)).

Any of the seller's trade creditors can bring an application under the BSA; there is no language in this Act limiting which trade creditors can bring an application. In this sense, the BSA effectively changes the priority of payout that unsecured trade creditors would otherwise enjoy. This means that even a trade creditor who would not have been entitled to a payout can bring a BSA application to the courts.

The liability of the buyer is encompassed by section 16 of the BSA. Where there is a finding of personal liability against the buyer, it must "account to the creditors of the seller" for the value of the stock it purchased in bulk (BSA, section 16(2)). This means that where a buyer has completed an asset acquisition but failed to account for the interests of the seller's trade creditors, the transaction can be set aside as void. The court can then require the buyer to account to the appropriate trade creditors for unpaid debts. If the buyer wishes to retain the assets it has already purchased, in order to account to the seller's trade creditors, the buyer will effectively be forced to pay twice for the same assets.

An important point to be made about the BSA is there is no time limit imposed on a trade creditor bringing such an application. The BSA therefore leaves the asset acquisition open to scrutiny by the court indefinitely after sale has been completed. After the parties have exchanged funds and assets, a trade creditor can still bring an application to the court and the transaction can be undone. This creates uncertainty as to the title of assets, adversely affecting the security interests of commercial lenders.

For example, suppose the buyer obtained a loan from a bank to assist in financing its asset acquisition. If a court sets aside the transaction, the security interest of the bank is compromised, and the buyer is left with the burden of obtaining additional financing to fund the second purchase of the same assets. This causes a problem for a buyer who requires bank or other secured lender financing to complete its purchase; those financiers may decline to fund a purchase of assets where compliance with the BSA has been waived by a buyer.

It is also important to note that the BSA is silent on the financial state of the seller's business. This legislation applies to all asset acquisitions regardless of whether the seller's business is solvent or insolvent. This means that an attorney must consider the implications of the BSA even when the seller operates a solvent business.

Attempting to Work Within the BSA

A buyer who wishes to complete an asset acquisition in Ontario has a few options that it can pursue in order to avoid liability under the BSA. While all of these options operate to either decrease or eliminate the buyer's liability, counsel must be mindful of the fact that they all involve an outlay of cash and time.

BSA Compliance

The BSA sets out a procedure for compliance, which involves a series of steps. The first step requires the buyer to demand and receive a statement from the seller (BSA, section 4(1)). This statement must be subsequently verified by an affidavit of the seller. The statement must list all of the seller's secured and unsecured trade creditors (BSA, section 4(2)). With respect to unsecured trade creditors, the statement must provide the names, addresses and amount of indebtedness payable or to become due and payable. The same information must be provided for secured creditors, along with the nature of the creditor's security and whether their claims are due or will become due at closing.

This step can be challenging, as not all trade creditors fall under the terms "secured" and "unsecured" as defined under the BSA. As a result, there must be an examination of each creditor to determine who must be listed in the statement, and further, what category of creditor they fall under. This analysis is further complicated by the fact that the definitions of secured and unsecured trade creditor under the BSA differ from the definitions otherwise used in the business world. For example, the BSA considers a lessor of real property (or any person who has a preference in its claim) to be a secured trade creditor (BSA, section 1, definition of "secured creditor"). The issues associated with choosing which creditors to list on the statement, and how to characterize them, makes this first step of compliance both costly and time-consuming.

The second step puts the onus on the buyer to ensure that all of the trade creditors listed on the statement are paid. This can be done in one of two ways. The buyer can either (i) verify that the seller has paid the trade creditors or made the appropriate arrangements to pay them (BSA, sections 8(1)(b) and 8(1)(c)), or (ii) deliver the proceeds of sale to a trustee, if the appropriate percentage of trade creditors consent to the buyer doing so (BSA, section 8(2)). A buyer will not be required to complete this second step if the seller's statement shows that the claims of the unsecured trade creditors do not exceed $2,500 and also that the claims of the secured trade creditors do not exceed $2,500 (BSA, section 8(1)(a)). We would assume this threshold would be exceeded on virtually every transaction where legal advice is sought.

The third and final step is completed within five days of the completion of the asset acquisition (BSA, section 11(1)). The buyer must swear an affidavit attesting to the fact that the BSA has been complied with (BSA, section 11(1)). The affidavit must set out the particulars of the sale and attach the seller's statement as an exhibit (BSA, section 11(2)).

The procedure for compliance under the BSA is clearly onerous and raises serious concerns for legal counsel. If the compliance route is chosen, even a seemingly simple asset acquisition can become overcomplicated, time-consuming and expensive. Therefore, compliance may not be suitable for the acquisition of small to mid-sized businesses. This is particularly true where small to mid-sized businesses have many trade creditors, as the former will be more sensitive to the substantial delay and increase in costs resulting from BSA compliance. Compliance also becomes challenging in a sale of a business which is occurring during weak economic times or where the seller is selling assets in any kind of distress situation.

Court-Ordered Exemptions

If compliance with the procedures set out above appears insurmountable, the legislation does allow one way for parties to avoid compliance. Compliance can be avoided if the seller makes an application to the court requesting an order to exempt the transaction from BSA compliance (BSA, section 3(1)). In such case, the court will review the facts and assess the risks to the seller's trade creditors. The legislation only permits the court to grant such an order where there is unequivocal evidence that the transaction will be advantageous to the seller and will not impede the seller's ability to settle its debts with trade creditors (BSA, section 3(1)).

This option is not without its difficulties. Going to court is expensive, time-consuming and risky. Legal counsel will need to be retained to prepare the application. Adding extra legal services will inevitably increase the costs of the asset acquisition. Clients may not agree that the extra legal fees are warranted, especially where parties agree that the time, expense and fees of going to court to bring such an application could go to better use. There is also no guarantee when applying to the court that the seller will be successful. The court is given broad discretion to deal with applications for exemptions under the BSA. Given that the determination is completely fact-based, case law should be consulted to determine how the court has dealt with a similar fact pattern. Where the seller is clearly solvent and the value of the assets far outweigh the debts of creditors, the court will likely dispense with compliance (although if it is clear that the seller is solvent, the court could also insist that the parties follow the BSA's compliance process. Arguably, if there is no concern as to the seller's solvency, then the parties should have no problem complying with the BSA.)

However, many businesses tend to operate in the grey area of solvency; they are trade creditors themselves and are constantly waiting to collect on accounts receivable. In situations where the seller's solvency is questionable, the decision of the court will be unpredictable. Unless the parties are confident that the court will likely grant the exemption order, going to court will not be the best option. A failed application will result in increased transaction costs and fail to dispense with the issue of BSA compliance.

Contracting Out of Compliance

Where the seller is solvent and there is little to no risk that its trade creditors will not be paid, the transacting parties may agree to waive compliance with the BSA. This is a calculated risk taken by the buyer on the premise that the costs of compliance, or obtaining an exemption order, are greater than the risks associated with the potential liability under the BSA.

Before pursuing this option, the buyer should consider a few things. First, the purchase price should be renegotiated. The willingness of the buyer to increase its potential risks should be reflected in an abatement of the purchase price. Second, the buyer should obtain an indemnity from the seller. In the event that a trade creditor is not paid, the seller should indemnify the buyer from any and all liability. Prior to obtaining an indemnity the buyer should assess the credit position of the seller. If the seller is not in a credit position to indemnify the buyer, then the indemnity is of no value, which increases the risk to the buyer if the buyer accepts this alternative.

Judicial Exemption After the Transaction

Recognizing the difficulties created by the BSA, the Supreme Court of Canada carved out an exemption in situations where failure to comply does not negatively affect the position of trade creditors. In National Trust Co. v. H&R Block Canada Inc., supra (H&R Block), the court took a logical approach to the BSA and considered whether the trade creditor's position would have been different if BSA compliance had occurred. In this case, the proceeds of the sale were insufficient to pay all of the trade creditors. The seller had provided payment to its trade creditors based on their priority but, given its position, the applicant creditor was not paid. The court found the applicant creditor suffered no loss, as it would have been in the exact same position regardless of the parties' BSA compliance.

H&R Block suggests that where the seller pays the proceeds to all creditors entitled to payment, BSA compliance can be dispensed with. However, there are a few concerns with proceeding in this manner. First, this decision is fairly recent, and this treatment of the BSA is novel. There is yet to be a body of case law on this point, and as a result, proceeding in this manner can be risky.

Second, in larger transactions, parties are generally not willing to gamble large amounts of money by relying on one decision. This is particularly true where third party lenders are involved in the transaction. Such parties will not compromise the security of their loans, given the major ramifications if a trade creditor is successful in getting the transaction reversed.

Third, as this exception is created through common law, it is up to the courts to decide whether the particular facts of a case warrant this exemption. Given that there is no legislation governing the application of this exemption, and only one case discussing it, success is by no means expected.

Finally, even if a party is successful in convincing a court to grant an exemption from compliance, that party is still required to expend money and time associated with litigating the matter. As in the case of a pre-transaction exemption order, the party must retain legal counsel and prepare for its day in court.

Solution: Share Acquisition

The major benefits of an asset acquisition include the buyer's ability to "cherry pick" the assets it wants and the ability to avoid the liabilities associated with inheriting the entire business. However, with the complications that the BSA brings to bear on an asset transaction, the BSA definitely serves to deter buyers who are considering purchasing an ongoing business from structuring the transaction as an asset purchase. To attempt to comply with the BSA can be costly. To proceed with an asset transaction without complying with the BSA creates an entirely new realm of potential liability for the buyer. In addition, the aforementioned options for working within the confines of the BSA are not ideal, as each one of them increases the costs of the transaction and may delay the closing. Also, where the buyer requires third party financing to complete the transaction and compliance with the BSA is not possible in the circumstances, a share deal may be the only reasonable alternative to ensure the buyer has clear title to the underlying assets of the business which will be securitized as part of the financing.

It is therefore clear that the current structure of the BSA operates as a general deterrent to conducting asset acquisitions in Ontario. As the BSA only applies to the purchase of stock in bulk, this definition does not encompass the sale of shares. This suggests that the share acquisition is a better option for attorneys involved in mergers and acquisitions in Ontario, as the parties can avoid the issues associated with the BSA and its onerous compliance requirements.


Ontario has a vibrant corporate landscape and economy and is generally considered an attractive place to invest by the international business community. Its population resides in close proximity to the US border, its economy is stable and strong, and its corporate laws are structured to facilitate a high level of activity. However, prior to engaging in an acquisition of an ongoing business in Ontario, foreign advisors need to be aware of the challenges the BSA poses in this type of transaction.

Although the BSA is in need of reform, it is crucial to understand how to structure transactions in Ontario within the current legislative landscape. Until much-needed amendments are made to the BSA, counsel should educate themselves about the risks involved and evaluate the pros and cons presented by the BSA when initially structuring the transaction.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Goldman Sloan Nash & Haber LLP
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Goldman Sloan Nash & Haber LLP
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions