ARTICLE
14 November 2011

Ontario Energy Board Amends Licence For New Transmitter

SE
Stikeman Elliott LLP

Contributor

Stikeman Elliott LLP logo
Stikeman Elliott is a global leader in Canadian business law and the first call for businesses working in and with Canada. We provide clients with the highest quality counsel, strategic advice, and creative solutions. Stikeman Elliott consistently ranks as a top law firm in our primary practice areas. www.stikeman.com
The Ontario Energy Board has ordered that the transmitter licence for TransCanada Transmission (TCT) be amended to change the effective date to the earlier of: (i) the date on which TCT is designated as a developer of transmission assets in Ontario pursuant to a Board designation process: or (ii) the date on which TCT applies for approval to own and/or operate specific transmission facilities in Ontario.
Canada Energy and Natural Resources

The Ontario Energy Board has ordered that the transmitter licence for TransCanada Transmission (TCT) be amended to change the effective date to the earlier of: (i) the date on which TCT is designated as a developer of transmission assets in Ontario pursuant to a Board designation process: or (ii) the date on which TCT applies for approval to own and/or operate specific transmission facilities in Ontario.

The order is effectively a reversal of the Board's earlier decisiondenying TCT an exemption to certain obligations under the Board's Affiliate Relationships Code for Electricity Distributors and Transmitters (ARC). TCT was particularly concerned with a requirement in the ARC that prohibited it from sharing employees that have access to confidential customer information with other TransCanada affiliates. TCT argued that this requirement drove-up costs and was unnecessary as newly licenced transmitters do not yet have any customers in Ontario.

The Board initially refused to grant an exemption because it was concerned that TCT could receive confidential information as part of the designation process. The Board was willing to revisit that decision in light of the release of the OPA's report on the East-West Tie Line and the IESO's feasibility study of that line, which will form the basis for the Board's designation process for the East-West Tie Line. Both of these reports are publicly available and do not contain confidential customer information. On that basis, the Board concluded that "the original concern has been diminished sufficiently to warrant a different approach to balancing the considerations of ensuring appropriate protections through licensing requirements and the desirability of reducing unnecessary barriers to entry for prospective transmitters." The Board indicated that if becomes

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More