Canada: Directors’ Duties In Various Corporate Forms

Last Updated: September 20 2011
Article by Barry J. Reiter

This article originally appeared in the Director Journal, a publication of the Institute of Corporate Directors (ICD).

The jobs may sound similar, but the underlying risks are very different.

What are directors' duties across various corporate forms, and how should directors protect themselves from the distinctive risks they may encounter? This article will tackle these subjects at a high level; for the 750-page version, see my Directors' Duties in Canada, 4th Edition, published by CCH in 2009.

Directors' Legal Duties

All corporations, from public companies through private companies, Crown entities (corporations and agencies), and charities, tend to impose two basic legal duties. The Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA ) is typical:

  • Directors, in exercising their powers and discharging their duties, must act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the corporation, and must exercise the care, diligence and skills that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances;
  • Directors must act free of conflict, disclosing the nature and extent of any interest they have in a material contract or transaction made or proposed with the corporation and (with limited exceptions) recusing themselves from the voting on those issues.

Applicable legislation usually goes on to provide other specific obligations, including liability for unpaid wages, corporate distributions during insolvency, failure to withhold or remit a variety of taxes, and endangerment of workers or failing to prevent pollution.

Directors' Duties in Practice

(i) Public Companies

While directors must and do pay attention to their legal duties, these duties tend not to be the most top-of-mind or complex in terms of discharging a director's duty or protecting against director liability. The "easy case" is that of a widely-held, publicly traded corporation. There, the applicable statutes require the existence of a multi-person board, an audit committee comprising (a minimum of three) independent and financially literate directors, and (practically speaking) compensation and corporate governance committees.

Many obligations of the board and of these committees are specified by law. The directors' primary duty is to maximize shareholder value (although Canadian courts have frequently said that directors should pay attention to other interests, ranging from those of customers, suppliers and employees through those of the environment and the communities in which the corporation does business). Directors shield themselves from legal liability by following processes outlined in governing regulation or generally accepted practices. Thus, for instance, directors avoid liability for tax and other withholdings by obtaining compliance certificates from executive officers; this "diligence" provides a defence to the liability.

Elsewhere, directors seek the protection of the "business judgment" rule, pursuant to which decisions of directors will be respected, and legal liability will be avoided, so long as directors acting in the absence of conflicts take adequate time and care in addressing questions before them. In these cases, a court will not substitute its judgment for that of the directors.

Allegations of negligence are a concern for directors of public companies, and increasingly so. While lawsuits naming directors were infrequent in Canada as recently as a decade ago, something like one-quarter of public companies are now subject to directors' liability claims. However, directors of solvent companies who have the benefit of well-drafted corporate indemnities do not face real liability exposure, nor do directors elsewhere, if they are protected by suitable directors' and officers' insurance programs.

Directors have begun to pay attention to the form of their indemnification and to details of their insurance programs, recognizing that these are not commodities but custom contracts that require the involvement of unconflicted advisers who are expert in the field. Directors, either individually or as a board, frequently retain independent external counsel to act for them in developing suitable forms of indemnification contracts and to establish appropriate insurance procurement processes. These should result in directors' and officers' insurance programs that fairly balance the somewhat conflicting interests of management, management directors and independent directors, as well as address the intricacies of the treacherous wording of insurance contracts to ensure that coverage is available when it is expected to be. Few, and possibly no, directors in Canada have had to satisfy a liability claim from personal funds.

With indemnification and insurance in place, directors need only fear legal liability in the sense of having to commit substantial time to the defence of a claim. Their real potential liability tends to be to regulators, the media, and their own reputations. Regulators often establish standards for directors' duties, and may do so on a subjective basis that takes into account the differing skills and experiences of, say, a financial expert who leads the audit committee and a businessdomain expert who is one of many directors on the board. The media have become interested in corporate affairs, and quickly ask, "Where were the directors?" when things go wrong.

In my personal experience as an adviser and as a director, the real motivator of directors is concern to do what is right, and to protect their own reputations in consequence. This concern causes directors to seek independent advice when their customary advisers, including internal or external counsel who may be or seem too tied to management, appear conflicted. Directors establish independent board leadership (separated chair and CEO roles, or a lead director role), engage their own audit and compensation consultants, seek independent representation on matters ranging from indemnification and directors' and officers' insurance to CEO succession, and form special committees quickly when specific issues appear to have the potential to create conflicts with management or among various directors.

So, looking at the concerns a public company director may have, the following advice should be considered:

  • Be alert to conflict concerns.
  • Ensure that the board functions independently and sets and pursues its own agenda, an agenda different from that of management.
  • Take the time to do your job properly.
  • Exercise your own judgment, independent of management, independent of your advisers, and independent of your fellow directors when necessary.
  • Document what you have done, including during in-camera sessions. Contemporaneous recording of the work the board has done is extremely helpful in establishing that directors have discharged their duties, in all of the different arenas in which the directors might be challenged.
  • Be sure that you have suitable contractual indemnification and directors' and officers' insurance. And be careful to ensure that you are represented in this by someone who is unconflicted and clearly acting for you.

(ii) Private Companies

At the other end of the spectrum is a private company, 100% owned by an individual shareholder. There is usually no need for a "board" of directors; the shareholder can be the only director. While many of the employment, tax and environmental liabilities will apply to this director (who also tends to be in charge of them as an executive), the duties of care, fiduciary duty and conflicts rules are not particularly relevant.

Owners develop private-company boards for a variety of reasons. The owner may wish to attract advisers who will commit to participate or be more intimately involved if they function as directors (rather than as ad-hoc sounding boards or as an advisory board). The board may be part of a succession-planning exercise – the presence of the board assures employees that there will be some continuity if the shareholder retires or passes on, and may allow for training of successor directors and executives. Boards are often created as companies grow, whether to expand the capacity of the oversight role or because of the involvement of partners or investors who insist on more formal governance.

Another example of companies of this sort is the Canadian subsidiary of a U.S. (or multinational) parent. A "compliance" board, comprising enough Canadian directors to satisfy corporate law requirements, is often needed. The parent may want this board to be a formality, or may seek to extract value from it, particularly as an advisory body on distinctively Canadian issues.

Directors of private companies do have legal exposure, including the specific employment, tax and environmental liabilities noted above, and liability to the sole shareholder (in a case in which director disagreement with the owner delays or defeats an owner's purpose) or to the other constituencies to which the directors are responsible (a particularly relevant consideration in the Canadian subsidiary context). Accordingly, directors of private companies should have contractual indemnification and appropriate directors' and officers' insurance.

However, the real exposures here are more those of disappointing someone, reputational damage or regulatory liability. The disappointment may be to the sole shareholder, who appointed the director in the first place, looking for some of the benefits listed above. The disappointment may be to third parties, including other investors, lenders, employees, customers or suppliers, who were looking to the director to bring responsibility and discipline to a previously one-ruler environment. Or the disappointment may be to the director personally, who may determine that he or she is wasting time in a situation in which the owning or controlling shareholder has no real interest in the director's views. Directors also find themselves in a difficult position when the best interests of a subsidiary conflict with the wishes of its parent.

The best path to avoiding liability here (apart from compliance with applicable processes referred to above in the discussion of public companies) is:

  • Achieve clarity in discussions with the controlling shareholder about their expectations of directors. Establish why the board is being created, and what sorts of contributions are expected.
  • Enforce the ground rules so established, including in cases in which the shareholder may not want to be advised or contradicted. Directors often have to deliver difficult messages (sometimes including a need for succession or for independence) to those who appointed them.

Of course, many private companies have several, or even many, shareholders. As the number of shareholders increases, particularly in the absence of a "unanimous shareholder agreement," the duties of the directors, and the steps they should take to protect themselves, approximate those of directors of public companies. The additional risk here is that directors might mistake the object of those duties, thinking that their responsibilities are to the shareholder who nominated them, rather than to the company. While shareholders can act in their own self-interest, generally without obligation to the other shareholders, this is not the case for directors: the usual fiduciary duties attach to them. This situation may be affected by unanimous shareholder agreements, which can remove certain matters from the authority or purview of directors; but until that is the case, directors should conduct themselves in accordance with public-company responsibility levels.

There can often also be confusion about legal representation in these situations. It is important to clarify who acts, without conflict or doubt, for the directors (particularly the independent directors). Inhouse and the company's customary external counsel may have management or substantial shareholder loyalties. Various family shareholders, and their nominee directors, may have their own counsel. Great care is required to ensure that the company-first responsibilities of the directors are being properly represented.

(iii) Crown Entities

Crown entities also tend to have one shareholder. But the purposes of Crown organizations, and therefore their boards, are often more complicated. Crown entities may exist to provide advice to governments, to exercise authority on somewhat of an independent basis, or to isolate a governmental function from political pressures.

Directors of Crown entities tend to be subject to the usual duties of care and strict duties with respect to the avoidance of conflicts. Whether or not directors' and officers' insurance is obtained, directors of these entities typically have indemnification from highly creditworthy organizations for acts taken in their capacity as directors and in good faith, minimizing their financial risk exposure.

However, the role of directors of Crown entities tends to be distinctive, and their exposure follows. A key factor in the Crown environment is that policy tends to originate outside of the board, with the shareholder. This is comparable to what happens in private companies, although in private companies the owner tends to be a director participating directly in the development or delivery of policy. The board of a Crown entity must be aware of the extent to which it can influence policy, either generally or in the course of its implementation.

The board must also be aware of the political dynamic involved, in two ways. First, there may well be a value associated with the board process – particularly within a highly participatory model – so that access and involvement by third parties, such as publicinterest groups, may be valued even to the point of impairment of board efficiency. Second, the very reason for the establishment of a Crown entity may lead to the abandonment of directors in a situation where the entity experiences an unhappy event. All of us can probably think of situations in which the chair of the board or all of the directors are fired after some wrongdoing is uncovered (and, typically, broadly publicized). The government will often attempt to portray the situation as one in which bad directors have been relieved. The directors may well portray it as a situation in which the directors operated within the policy guidance they were given, and with apparent government support, which was withdrawn as soon as adverse implications could be drawn. Issues at Ontario's hydro authorities, at the Niagara Parks Commission, and at the City of Toronto's public housing authority illustrate both views.

The possibility of being "thrown under the bus" is the ultimate risk (and, sometimes, the ultimate badge of honour!) in a situation in which reputational risk is the real exposure.

  • Directors of a Crown entity must recognize the risk of abandonment and deal with it by assiduous concern for appearances of conflict and a recognition that the director might ultimately find him – or herself alone, apart from the shareholder and from other directors.
  • Directors must try to fulfil their duties even though a sole shareholder does have ultimate authority.
  • Particular care should be taken to ensure that appropriate comments and concerns are made on and recorded in the formal records, even at some risk to collegiality.

(iv) Charitable Companies

Charitable boards are even more complicated. Board processes here involve the usual fiduciary duties, and potential liabilities must be addressed with indemnification and insurance as elsewhere. However, charitable boards tend to have participation or involvement per se as a significant aspect of the board process. Any failure by a charity also tends to excite media and public interest, so the reputational risk is highly significant.

Accordingly, the more difficult exposures here involve disappointing members or beneficiaries of the charity, and reputational risk generally. Suitable protection here may involve the following:

  • As with any other boards, the charitable board's job is distinct from that of its management. This is particularly important here because charities are often much controlled by their executive team, as opposed to their boards of directors, whose membership may change frequently. Directors should insist on sufficient information and a "formal enough" process to allow the board to do its work. Despite the seeming formality and possible sense of lack of trust that may ensue, it is important for the board to do its job and for it to insist on board leadership in aid of that, as well as suitable advance material and clarity on the board's agenda.
  • There must be an unusually scrupulous concern with independence, both in the sense of lack of conflicts and, because of the very strong hand of management, independence from management. Given the usually laudable purposes that motivate charities, it is easy to lose sight of other board concerns, ranging from the participatory nature of the corporation's processes through rigour in ensuring operational efficiency.
  • Directors must remain acutely aware of the political dynamic that is often present in these organizations. Public companies usually have the shining star of "maximizing shareholder value" to lead them forward, albeit clouded with some concern for other interests. The guiding light in a charitable corporation is often at so lofty a level as to not provide guidance. Directors may have to evolve for themselves what the purposes of the organization are, and what policies should be preferred over or at the expense of others. These corporations often lack the benefit of a single controlling or government shareholder that can deliver policy directives, so the evolution of policy alternatives tends to be more wide open and potentially destabilizing. An awareness of this dynamic and an insistence on the evolution and observance of suitable processes may help to minimize the risk here.

All the Same But Different!

Despite the apparently common expression of their legal duties, directors in different types of organizations are exposed to different kinds of risks. They must protect themselves by understanding the nature of those risks, and addressing them as is appropriate to the particular environment

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.