Canada: B.C. Court Considers Contested Plan Of Arrangement

Copyright 2011, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Litigation & Dispute Resolution/Securities Regulation, June 2011

On June 21, 2011, the Supreme Court of British Columbia (the Court) released a decision in Re Plutonic Power Corporation, rejecting the complaints of certain shareholders of Plutonic Power Corporation (Plutonic). Madam Justice Brown concluded that Plutonic had met the onus of satisfying the Court that the statutory procedures in approving a plan of arrangement had been met, the arrangement was fair and reasonable and served a valid business purpose, and that it adequately responded to the objections of affected parties. Plutonic applied for approval of a plan of arrangement pursuant to s. 291 of the Business Corporations Act, S.B.C. 2002 c. 57 (the BCA). The proposed arrangement was between Plutonic, its shareholders and Magma Energy Corp. (Magma), and involved the acquisition by Magma of all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Plutonic.

In reaching its decision that an order would be made approving the arrangement, the Court applied the principles set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in 2008 in B.C.E. Inc. v. 1976 Debenture Holders (B.C.E.). First, in seeking approval of an arrangement, the corporation bears the onus of satisfying the court that the statutory procedures have been met, the application has been put forward in good faith, and the arrangement is fair and reasonable; second, in order to determine whether a plan of arrangement is fair and reasonable, the court must be satisfied that the plan serves a valid business purpose and that it adequately responds to the objections and conflicts between different affected parties; and third, whether a plan of arrangement is fair and reasonable is determined by taking into account a variety of relevant factors, including the necessity of the arrangement to the corporation's continued existence, the approval, if any, of a majority of shareholders and other security holders entitled to vote, and the proportionality of the impact on affected groups.


Plutonic develops and operates environmentally friendly power projects, and was incorporated pursuant to the laws of British Columbia. Magma is a power company that develops and operates geothermal energy projects, and was also incorporated pursuant to the laws of British Columbia. Plutonic was in need of financing, and had dealt with a number of investment bankers and employed a merger and acquisition specialist in an attempt to find merger or acquisition opportunities. In December 2010, Magma's chairman and CEO and Plutonic's vice-chair and CEO met to discuss their mutual opportunities and challenges for growth. They decided to consider a potential merger of Magma and Plutonic, and began to conduct technical due diligence. Senior management teams met to discuss legal, financial, technical, social, environmental and operational issues throughout February, and Plutonic's Board of Directors (the Board) established a special committee tasked with considering the proposed transaction with Magma. The special committee consisted of the members of the Board who were not members of management of Plutonic.

The special committee and its advisors met with management of Plutonic and advised that it had agreed with Magma, subject to receiving approval from the Board and Magma, on an exchange ratio of 2.38 Magma shares and C$0.0001, in cash, for each share of Plutonic. An independent Canadian investment dealer, Cormark Securities Inc. (Cormark), had concluded that the exchange ratio would be fair, from a financial point of view, to Plutonic's shareholders. The special committee also unanimously agreed that the arrangement was fair, from a financial point of view, to Plutonic's shareholders, and that the proposed arrangement was in the best interests of Plutonic. Immediately following the meeting of the special committee, the Board unanimously approved the arrangement and determined that the proposed arrangement was fair to Plutonic's shareholders and in the best interests of Plutonic. Plutonic and Magma signed the arrangement agreement and issued a joint press release announcing the arrangement on March 7, 2011.


Plutonic submitted that the Court should approve the arrangement because the statutory procedures had been met, the application had been put forward in good faith, and the arrangement was fair and reasonable. Furthermore, the arrangement had a valid business purpose for several reasons, including that it had a positive value to Plutonic, there were no viable alternatives to the Magma offer, and no individual stakeholder was treated differently from any other. In establishing that the arrangement resolved, in a fair and balanced way, the objections of those whose rights were being arranged, Plutonic put forward several arguments including the result of the shareholder vote, the recommendation of the special committee and Cormark, and the provision of dissent rights.


The respondents were two shareholders holding 3.2% of the issued and outstanding shares of Plutonic. They argued that the statutory requirements had not been met because the holders of 6.4% of the issued and outstanding shares had exercised their dissent rights. Furthermore, in submitting that the arrangement was not fair or reasonable, the respondents challenged the fairness opinion provided by Cormark, the value of Magma and the exchange ratio, the necessity of the arrangement, and the result of the shareholders' vote. In support of these allegations, the respondents argued that the opinion of Cormark did not remain valid given a subsequent fall in Magma's share price, and that there were a range of financing and strategic options available to Plutonic that were not tested before Plutonic committed to the arrangement.


The Court was satisfied that the statutory procedures had been met. Plutonic had convened a shareholders' meeting, delivered the meeting materials, and received approval of the arrangement resolution by 73.47% of the shareholders. Plutonic had also received approval for the arrangement from the Toronto Stock Exchange and Magma's shareholders.

The Court rejected the respondents' submission that the statutory requirements had not been met because the holders of 6.4% of the issued and outstanding shares exercised dissent rights. Three notices of dissent, representing 1.5% of the issued and outstanding shares, appeared to be invalid, and one other notice of dissent, representing 0.6% of the issued and outstanding shares, was being reviewed for validity. There was no evidence that these notices of dissent were rejected on an improper basis.

The Court then turned to the issue of whether the plan of arrangement was fair and reasonable, following the test that it must serve a valid business purpose and adequately respond to the objections of different affected parties in a fair and balanced way. The Court was satisfied that the arrangement served a valid business purpose, accepting the evidence of Plutonic that the arrangement had a positive value to the company, and was necessary for its ongoing operation. The Court further noted that the market reaction to the announcement of the arrangement was positive, and that no individual stakeholder or group of stakeholders was treated differently from any other.

The Court was also satisfied that the arrangement resolved in a fair and balanced way the objections of those whose rights were being affected, accepting Plutonic's submissions on the matter and citing the following reasons:

a) the shareholders approved the arrangement by 73.47%;
b) intelligent and honest business people as members of the voting class acting reasonably in their own interests approved the arrangement;
c) the arrangement was the result of arm's-length negotiation between two companies to their mutual benefit;
d) there were no conflicting interests between different groups of affected rights holders;
e) the Plutonic directors who endorsed the arrangement and its terms had extensive experience;
f) a special committee of independent directors was formed to consider the arrangement;
g) the fairness opinion was obtained from Cormark, an expert of high repute;
h) the arrangement was fair to the Plutonic shareholders from a financial point of view;
i) the Plutonic shareholders were given dissent and appraisal rights; and
j) no individual stakeholder or group of stakeholders was being treated differently.

The Court did not accept the respondents' submission that Cormark's fairness opinion should be rejected. There existed no expert opinion to suggest that the assessment and analysis conducted by Cormark was not standard in the industry or appropriate in the circumstances. The Court also endorsed Plutonic's argument that an opinion is necessarily given as of a point in time, and it would be impractical or prohibitively expensive to obtain an updated opinion as of the date of court approval or as of the date of conclusion of the transaction.

The Court further rejected the respondents' submissions that their dissent rights were not sufficient because the valuation mechanism was inherently flawed due to the fact that the value is to be determined immediately prior to the shareholder vote. The Court noted that the arrangement agreement provided that the obligations of Plutonic to complete the transaction were subject to the condition that "there shall not have occurred a Material Adverse Change to or a Material Adverse Effect on Magma". These terms were defined to include any change in the market prices of the securities of Magma.

In concluding that an order would be made approving the plan of arrangement pursuant to s. 291 of the BCA, the Court held that Plutonic had met the onus of satisfying the Court that the statutory procedures had been met, the application had been put forward in good faith, and the arrangement was fair and reasonable. The Court was satisfied that the arrangement served a valid business purpose and that it adequately responded to the objections of affected parties.


The Plutonic decision provides guidance to corporations as to the steps necessary to satisfy the Court that an arrangement is fair and reasonable and is instructive as to the high evidentiary threshold that must be met in objecting to an arrangement. The Court not only confirms the principles set out in B.C.E. as the test to satisfy when seeking court approval of a plan of arrangement but also makes it clear that shareholders seeking to challenge an arrangement will be unlikely to succeed without substantial evidence in support of their position.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Commercial Real Estate group as they discuss five key provisions of a commercial real estate purchase agreement that are often the subject of much negotiation but are sometimes misunderstood.

1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.