Canada: Quebec Superior Court Hands Down A First Ruling On The Immunity Of Municipalities Under The Fire Safety Act

In June 2000, the Quebec Government adopted Bill 112, the Fire Safety Act1 – the culmination of several years of consultations by the Public Security Ministry with the various stakeholders in the area of fire prevention. The goal of the process was to reduce human and material loss attributable to fire in all regions of the Province of Quebec. The Act introduces "fire safety cover plans" as a primary tool for fire safety management by elected municipal officials. It is also meant to assist the planning of emergency response operations by fire safety personnel on the ground. A major benefit for a municipality or regional county municipality (RCM) entailed in adopting and implementing a fire safety cover plan is that it affords immunity from being sued in relation to fire service interventions. That immunity, conferred pursuant to section 47 of the Act, had not been the subject of consideration by the Quebec courts until March 31, 2011, when the Quebec Superior Court handed down judgment in Compagnie canadienne d'assurances générales Lombard c. St Jérôme (Ville de).2 The decision is an important one for Quebec municipalities and other fire service stakeholders, as it delimits, for the first time, the scope of the immunity granted under the Act.

In this case, Justice Daniel W. Payette had to rule on a single question, namely, whether the City of St-Jérôme could benefit from the immunity in connection with legal proceedings taken in regard to an intervention by its fire department at the scene of a fire in April 2005.3 The insurance company (Lombard), subrogated to the rights of the owner of the damaged property, alleged in the action that the City's fire department had been negligent, among other things, by not ensuring that the fire was truly extinguished before leaving the scene. In fact, the fire had started again after the firefighters left, resulting in substantial additional damage to the property. In defence, the City invoked the immunity under section 47 of the Act since, in the summer of 2003, it established a fire safety cover plan in conjunction with the RCM Rivière du Nord. The cover plan was then adopted by the RCM in August 2003 and declared compliant by the Minister of Public Security in May 2004.

Since the questions relating to the adoption, entry into force and implementation of the cover plan by the City were the subject of joint admissions by the parties, the Court's analysis was limited to the dispute regarding the interpretation of the word "intervention" as used in section 47 of the Act. The section provides that the fire safety service of an entity that has duly adopted and implemented a fire safety cover plan is "exempt from liability for any damage that may result from [its] intervention during a fire [...]." Lombard argued that the term "intervention" should be construed narrowly and limited to situations where the alleged negligence was directly related to the four components of a fire safety intervention, as defined by the Minister in his statement of fire safety general policies (orientations) accompanying the Act.4 These components are 1) the intervention timeline, 2) the intervention personnel, 3) the intervention equipment, and 4) the water supplies needed. These policies make no reference to operations related to clearing, searching and extinguishing a fire's remains, which, in Lombard's view, meant that the immunity could not apply to them. For its part, the City argued that the term "intervention" appearing in section 47 of the Act should receive the broad interpretation frequently ascribed to it in relation to fire safety, and thus encompass all operations performed by firefighters, including inspections made after a fire.

Justice Payette began by noting that none of the exceptions under section 47 of the Act that might have applied so as to deny the City the benefit of the immunity were applicable in this case since it was acknowledged, by mutual consent of the parties, that the cover plan was duly and properly adopted, implemented and applied. Following a brief overview of the objectives set by the Minister of Public Security at the outset of the parliamentary work that led to the tabling of Bill 112, the judge pointed out a statement by the Minister indicating that the Act's adoption had sought to neutralize the "pernicious" effects of decisions rendered by the courts in the wake of the ruling in Laurentide Motels Ltd. v. Beauport (City).5 In that case, the Supreme Court of Canada had found that while municipalities could not be held liable for their policy decisions, they could be held liable for the decisions made by them in relation to the practical execution of those policy decisions. Justice Payette went on to cite the Minister's comments at the time of the parliamentary debates to the effect that the adoption of the Act was intended to stem the steady growth in liability suits against municipalities relating to firefighting services since the Laurentide Motels decision. Indeed, while the parliamentary debates were going on, the Minister even saw the immunity as a reward for municipalities that were diligent in developing and implementing a fire safety cover plan.

For Justice Payette, these objectives showed that the lawmaker wished the immunity to apply broadly to all firefighters' interventions at the time of a fire. Consequently, the Court dismissed Lombard's argument based on the putative relationship between the components described in the general policies statement (orientations), which was to have guided the development of the cover plan, and the immunity protected by section 47 of the Act. In the Court's view, if the intent had been to limit the immunity in this way, the lawmaker would have done so explicitly in the Act. Justice Payette also rejected Lombard's argument that the common meaning of the word "intervention" does not encompass work or operations that take place after a fire is extinguished. Indeed, the Court points out that both the Guide des opérations à l'intention des services de sécurité incendie published by the Public Security Ministry and the City of Montréal's directives for safety operations include the work involved in clearing and surveillance of a fire's remains as part of an "intervention."

The Court concludes its analysis with a review of related or comparable legislation containing immunity provisions similar to the one in the Act. For example, the Act respecting pre-hospital emergency services6 provides for persons who act as first responders at the scene of a disaster or accident to have such immunity. During the debates that led to the adoption of that act, the Minister of Health and Social Services had noted that firefighters were already "exempted from liability in the course of their work" and that it was necessary to harmonize the two acts since firefighters are often de facto first responders. The Court also draws a parallel with the immunity granted to certified 9-1-1 emergency centres and dispatch centres for police and fire departments under the Civil Protection Act.7 In light of these provisions, Justice Payette therefore concludes that the immunity granted under the Fire Safety Act must cover all the operations that a firefighter may be called upon to perform at the time of a fire, including clearing and surveillance of the fire's remains.

Justice Payette's ruling marks a major development in Quebec municipal law in that it establishes the effectiveness of the defence that the lawmaker has seen fit to introduce for the benefit of municipalities and RCMs that have duly adopted and implemented a fire safety cover plan. In light of this decision, it would now appear that plaintiffs wishing to hold such entities liable for the actions of their firefighters may succeed in doing so only if they are able to show that there was gross negligence or intentional fault or that the fire safety cover plan adopted by the municipality or RCM and approved by the Minister of Public Security was not properly implemented. This suggests that the Minister's stated objective at the time the First Safety Act was adopted, namely, to rein in lawsuits against public entities in relation to firefighting services, will be facilitated by the ruling. However, it should be noted that an appeal from Justice Payette's judgment was lodged on April 29, 2011. It will therefore be interesting to see if the Quebec Court of Appeal chooses to weigh in on this issue, and if so, whether it will agree with the broad construction of the Act's provisions by the Superior Court.


1. Fire Safety Act, R.S.Q., c. S-3.4.

2. Compagnie canadienne d'assurances générales Lombard c. St-Jérôme (Ville de), 2011 QCCS 1464 (CanLII), J.E. 2011-722 (S.C.), Justice Daniel W. Payette, inscription in appeal, 2011-04-29 (C.A.), 500-09-021653-118.

3. In accordance with article 452 C.C.P., the parties chose, during the proceedings, to ask the Court to rule on this question of law alone, based on the facts and allegations set out in the proceedings, which they asked the Court to consider as if proven.

4. As provided in sections 135 and following of the Act, these policies are guidelines for fire prevention, personnel training, emergency preparedness and emergency response procedures which are published in the Gazette officielle du Québec and are to be taken into consideration by RCMs and other local authorities in establishing and implementing their fire safety cover plans.

5. Laurentide Motels Ltd. v. Beauport (City), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 705.

6. Act respecting pre-hospital emergency services, R.S.Q., c. S-6.2.

7. R.S.Q., c. S-2.3, s. 52.19.

Norton Rose OR LLP

Norton Rose OR LLP is a member of Norton Rose Group, a leading international legal practice offering a full business law service to many of the world's pre-eminent financial institutions and corporations from offices in Europe, Asia Pacific, Canada, Africa and the Middle East.

The Group's lawyers share industry knowledge and sector expertise across borders to support clients anywhere in the world. The Group is strong in financial institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and pharmaceuticals and life sciences.

Norton Rose Group has more than 2600 lawyers operating from 39 offices in Abu Dhabi, Amsterdam, Athens, Bahrain, Bangkok, Beijing, Brisbane, Brussels, Calgary, Canberra, Cape Town, Dubai, Durban, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hong Kong, Johannesburg, London, Melbourne, Milan, Montréal, Moscow, Munich, Ottawa, Paris, Perth, Piraeus, Prague, Québec, Rome, Shanghai, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto and Warsaw; and from associate offices in Dar es Salaam, Ho Chi Minh City and Jakarta.

Norton Rose Group comprises Norton Rose LLP, Norton Rose Australia, Norton Rose OR LLP, Norton Rose South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc), and their respective affiliates.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.