Canada: Supreme Court Refines Confusion Analysis In Trade-Mark Cases

On May 26, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada released a unanimous decision overturning the Federal Court of Appeal's decision in Masterpiece Inc. v. Alavida Lifestyles Inc. In its decision, the Supreme Court examined the assessment of confusion in trade-mark cases, clarifying the applicable standard to guide future cases. In addition, the Supreme Court made it clear that trade-mark priority is national in scope.

Case history

Masterpiece Inc. ("Masterpiece") and Alavida Lifestyles Inc. ("Alavida") are both involved in the retirement residence industry. Masterpiece had been operating in Alberta since 2001 and had used several unregistered trade-marks, including MASTERPIECE THE ART OF LIVING, and the trade-name MASTERPIECE. Alavida entered the market in 2005 and operates in Ontario. In December 2005, Alavida applied to register the trade-mark MASTERPIECE LIVING on the basis of proposed use. Shortly after Alavida filed its application, Masterpiece changed its branding slightly and began using the very same trade-mark, MASTERPIECE LIVING. Eventually, Masterpiece sought its own application for both MASTERPIECE LIVING and MASTERPIECE. However, due to Alavida's prior application, which was eventually granted, Masterpiece's applications were denied.

Masterpiece subsequently commenced an application seeking to expunge Alavida's marks on the basis that they were confusing with Masterpiece's trade-marks and trade-name, which had been used prior to the filing of Alavida's application. Justice O'Reilly of the Federal Court denied Masterpiece's application finding that there was no likelihood of confusion between Alavida's and Masterpiece's marks. The Federal Court of Appeal upheld the decision.

The Supreme Court's findings

In a unanimous decision written by Justice Rothstein, the Supreme Court overturned the Federal Court of Appeal's decision, finding a likelihood of confusion did exist and ordered that Alavida's mark be expunged.1 In reaching this decision, the Court made a number of comments in respect of the proper approach for assessing confusion and the propriety of expert evidence in trade-mark cases.

Geographic scope

At the relevant time, Masterpiece operated in Alberta and Alavida operated in Ontario. Arguments had been made that the location where the marks were actually being used was relevant to the confusion analysis. The Supreme Court clarified that geographical use within Canada is not a relevant consideration when considering confusion with a registered mark. In particular, Justice Rothstein noted "[t]he Canadian trade-marks regime is national in scope. The owner of a registered trade-mark, subject of a finding of invalidity, is entitled to the exclusive use of that mark in association with the wares or services to which it is connected throughout Canada." Thus, "[i]n order for the owner of a registered trade-mark to have exclusive use of the trade-mark throughout Canada, there cannot be a likelihood of confusion with another trade-mark anywhere in the country."

Assessing resemblance between marks

The Supreme Court confirmed that the degree of resemblance between the marks in question is the most important factor in the confusion analysis.

In assessing the degree of resemblance, the use to the registered trade-mark must be considered in any way permissible under the registration and not limited to the actual use of the mark by the trade-mark owner. The Supreme Court found that the lower Courts erred in considering only the way in which Alavida actually used its mark rather than considering that, pursuant to the registration, Alavida could use the words MASTERPIECE LIVING in any form.

In comparing the marks, the Supreme Court held that the preferred approach is to first consider whether there is an aspect of the trade-mark that is particularly striking or unique. In this case, the Court found that the word 'Masterpiece' is what distinguishes Alavida and Masterpiece from other sources of retirement residence services. As 'Masterpiece' is the dominant word in both parties' trade-marks, there is a strong resemblance as a whole between the marks.

Nature of trade

In assessing the likelihood of confusion, the trial judge gave consideration to the cost associated with a retirement residence. In particular, Justice O'Reilly held that consumers in the market for a retirement residence will take more care and will be less likely to be led astray by confusing trade-marks than if they were in the market for less expensive wares or services.

The Supreme Court clarified that, although consumers in the market for expensive goods may be less likely to be confused when they encounter a trade-mark, the likelihood of confusion is still premised on the first impression of consumers when they encounter the marks in question. Even with increased attentiveness, it may still be likely that a consumer shopping for expensive goods and services will be confused by the trade-marks they encounter. Careful research and deliberation prior to purchasing the goods or services may dispel any trade-mark confusion that may have arisen, but this does not mean that no confusion ever existed. Further, Justice Rothstein held "[i]n circumstances where a strong resemblance suggests a likelihood of confusion, and the other s. 6(5) factors do not point strongly against a likelihood of confusion, then the cost is unlikely to lead to a different conclusion."

In making this pronouncement, the Supreme Court may have imported, though not by name, the "initial interest confusion" doctrine into Canadian law, which has long been recognized in the United States. Pursuant to the doctrine, the goodwill in a trade-mark may be diminished even in cases where confusion is dispelled at the time of the purchase. Indeed, the Supreme Court considered that as a result of the "initial" confusion, the consumers may have purchased wares or services "from a source they previously had no awareness of or interest in".

Expert and survey evidence

The Supreme Court also made a number of observations regarding the propriety of expert and survey evidence in trade-mark cases. In particular, Justice Rothstein found that in cases of wares or services being marketed to the general public, expert evidence is not often necessary or helpful. Rather, judges should consider the marks at issue, having regard to the dominant or striking feature of the trade-mark, and use their own common sense to determine whether the casual consumer would be likely to be confused.

In contrast, surveys have the potential to provide empirical evidence which demonstrates consumer reactions in the marketplace and may be helpful to the confusion analysis. However, for a survey to be valid, there must be some consumers who could have an imperfect recollection of the first mark. In this case, as the two parties operated in different provinces, there were no casual or average consumers with "imperfect recollection" of Masterpiece's marks to test. As a result, the survey evidence was based on a series of questions that attempted to establish a proxy for imperfect recollection. Justice Rothstein noted, "while I would not absolutely foreclose the possibility that a party may devise a valid survey in a case where a trade-mark user has not established a sufficient presence in the marketplace for consumers to have formed an imperfect recollection of its trade-mark, I would venture that it is highly unlikely that such a survey would meet the requirements of reliability and validity."

Justice Rothstein encouraged parties and the lower courts to assess the admissibility and usefulness of proposed expert and survey evidence at an early stage in the proceedings in order minimize the resources spent on developing evidence that may ultimately have little utility.

Link to judgment

Masterpiece Inc. v. Alavida Lifestyles Inc., 2011 SCC 27


1. The Court ordered that the Alavida registration be expunged but this order does not necessarily mean that Masterpiece's applications for the marks MASTERPIECE LIVING and MASTERPIECE will proceed to registration. These applications will still have to be evaluated on their own merits by the Trade-marks Office.

Norton Rose OR LLP

Norton Rose OR LLP is a member of Norton Rose Group, a leading international legal practice offering a full business law service to many of the world's pre-eminent financial institutions and corporations from offices in Europe, Asia Pacific, Canada, Africa and the Middle East.

The Group's lawyers share industry knowledge and sector expertise across borders to support clients anywhere in the world. The Group is strong in financial institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and pharmaceuticals and life sciences.

Norton Rose Group has more than 2600 lawyers operating from 39 offices in Abu Dhabi, Amsterdam, Athens, Bahrain, Bangkok, Beijing, Brisbane, Brussels, Calgary, Canberra, Cape Town, Dubai, Durban, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hong Kong, Johannesburg, London, Melbourne, Milan, Montréal, Moscow, Munich, Ottawa, Paris, Perth, Piraeus, Prague, Québec, Rome, Shanghai, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto and Warsaw; and from associate offices in Dar es Salaam, Ho Chi Minh City and Jakarta.

Norton Rose Group comprises Norton Rose LLP, Norton Rose Australia, Norton Rose OR LLP, Norton Rose South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc), and their respective affiliates.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.