Canada: Critical Habitat for Endangered Species – What is the Scope of Protection?

Copyright 2010, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Environmental Law, December 2010

A recent decision of the Federal Court found that a Protection Statement and a Protection Order for the Northern and Southern Resident populations of the Killer Whale, issued under the federal Species at Risk Act (SARA), are unlawful. The court confirmed that SARA creates stricter protections for the critical habitat of aquatic species than other federal legislation such as the Fisheries Act. This ruling adds to the growing body of law under SARA in which the courts have been critical of the manner in which the government, and in particular the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (the DFO), has been implementing SARA. It also raises the broader thorny issue of how areas with critical habitat can be managed without dramatically impacting economic activity.


SARA requires the federal government to create recovery strategies for species listed as "threatened" or "endangered". These strategies must, where possible, identify critical habitat. In 2008 and 2009, the Federal Court ruled that critical habitat identification must include both the geophysical (i.e., spatial) delineation, as well as the attributes which make the habitat critical. For aquatic species, once critical habitat is identified in a registered recovery strategy, SARA requires the government to take one of two actions:

  1. issue an order that the prohibitions in SARA are applicable to the critical habitat (called a Protection Order); or
  2. issue a statement that the critical habitat is already protected under other acts of Parliament or under a Conservation Agreement (called a Protection Statement).

If a Protection Order is issued, there is a prohibition on destruction of the critical habitat under section 58 of SARA. Conversely, if a Protection Statement is issued, then there are no specific prohibitions in SARA that apply to the critical habitat.

SARA contains some provisions for issuing permits to destroy critical habitat, but they are tightly prescribed, including that:

  • the harm be incidental to the permitted activity;
  • all reasonable alternatives have been considered and the best solution has been adopted;
  • all feasible measures are taken to mitigate the impacts; and
  • the activity will not jeopardize the survival or recovery of the species.

SARA permits are also limited to a maximum of five years, making them particularly problematic for long-term operations.

The Killer Whale Actions

The recent decision arises from a challenge by a group of environmental non-governmental organizations (ENGOs) regarding the protection of the critical habitats of the Killer Whales. One of these species is listed as "endangered" under SARA, and the other is listed as "threatened". In 2008, the DFO issued a recovery strategy for the two populations which identified areas of critical habitat off the coast of British Columbia, and three principal critical attributes of the habitat: prey (i.e., salmon) availability, unpolluted water and a quiet environment.

In September 2008, the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans issued a Protection Statement, stating that the Killer Whales' critical habitat is already protected under the Fisheries Act and the Oceans Act, as well as a number of federal policies and provincial laws. Thus, the prohibitions in SARA against destroying the critical habitat were not applied. The Protection Statement led to the first judicial review application by the ENGOs. Prior to the judicial review being heard, the federal government replaced the Protection Statement with a Protection Order, which applied the SARA prohibition on destroying the critical habitat, described in the Order by the geophysical boundaries identified in the recovery strategy. The ENGOs then applied for judicial review of the Protection Order. The two applications were consolidated and, on December 7, 2010, the court issued its decision on both.

The Protection Statement

The key part of the decision is the court's discussion of the protections afforded critical habitat under SARA and the ability of the federal government to rely on other instruments to provide that protection. The court confirmed that any instrument relied upon in a Protection Statement must be legally enforceable and mandatory, and must be federal. A Protection Statement cannot rely on policy, guidelines or other similar instruments (unless they have the force of law, which DFO policies do not) and cannot rely on provincial laws.

The court also confirmed that the protection provided by the other instruments must be equivalent to the protections under SARA, and that an analysis of that equivalency must include consideration of what the relevant legislation allows in terms of permitting harm to the habitat. This means that any instrument to be relied on instead of SARA, must prohibit the destruction of the critical habitat and must not grant discretion to the government to allow for the destruction of that habitat, unless that discretion is limited in the same manner as SARA's permitting provisions.

The court specifically reviewed section 35 of the Fisheries Act (habitat protection) and held that it cannot act as a substitute for the protection of critical habitat under SARA, because the Minister has unlimited discretion to issue authorizations to destroy the habitat. Similarly, the court held that section 36 of the Fisheries Act (deposits of deleterious substances) does not provide equivalent protection, as the federal cabinet has the ability to issue regulations allowing substances to be deposited and there are no statutory restrictions on what can be allowed. The court did suggest that if the Fisheries Act, or a regulation under it, established criteria for issuing authorizations for critical habitat which had conditions equivalent to those in SARA, then the Fisheries Act could be potentially relied upon in future Protection Statements.

With one exception, this decision would appear to make the Protection Statement provisions of SARA of little use to the federal government for managing the critical habitat of aquatic species, given that there is currently no other federal law which protects aquatic habitat to the extent set out in SARA.

The one exception for avoiding the issuance of a Protection Order is reliance on a Conservation Agreement under SARA. However, the decision makes it clear that not any Conservation Agreement can be relied upon to establish equivalent protection. Rather, the court held that only an agreement that protects critical habitat and limits activities impacting the habitat to the same standard as SARA can be used to support a Protection Statement. Nonetheless, a Conservation Agreement remains a tool to be given serious consideration if there are activities to be carried out which potentially impact critical habitat.

The Protection Order

Another key aspect of the decision is the court's discussion of the legality of the Protection Order. The court confirmed that the prohibitions against destroying critical habitat in SARA are not limited to just the geophysical aspects of the habitat. SARA also protects the individual attributes that are identified in the recovery strategy, which, in this case, meant the water quality, the noise levels and the availability of prey.

One question the court did not address is how the protection of the various attributes of the critical habitat are to be applied. While impacts of certain activities on attributes of the habitat may be readily understood and managed, as they now are under section 35 of the Fisheries Act, others pose much more complex problems. For example, in the case of the Killer Whale, how will the government enforce the prohibition on destroying the attribute which requires that prey be available in the critical habitat area, and against whom will it be enforced?

Implications to the DFO

There are several aspects of this decision that are likely to impact how the DFO is managing critical habitat that has been identified in a recovery strategy. First, the DFO will need to review any Protection Statements already issued for aquatic species' critical habitat, and consider whether there is a need to revise them, or replace them with Protection Orders. Operators and property owners whose activities impact such habitat, should be aware that if Protection Orders are issued, the prohibitions in SARA against destruction of the attributes of the habitat will be applicable to their operations, and an existing authorization under the Fisheries Act will not protect them.

Second, for those recovery strategies registered in the future, the DFO will need to consider what mechanisms will be used to protect the critical habitat. In addition to Protection Orders, consideration should be given to the use of Conservation Agreements, which may be a more effective manner in which to manage the critical habitat in co-operation with impacted parties. Consideration should also be given as to whether an amendment to the Fisheries Act or regulations setting out conditions for section 35 authorizations impacting SARA-registered critical habitat are needed.

Application to Other Species

SARA's prohibitions do not apply to all critical habitat across Canada unless the habitat is on federal land. For species not on federal land, SARA's prohibition on destroying critical habitat applies only to migratory birds habitat (under specific circumstances set out in SARA) and to aquatic species that are subject to Protection Orders. However, the federal government can order the prohibitions to be extended to other species' critical habitat. Under SARA, if a federal minister is of the view that a provincial or territorial government is not "effectively protecting" a species' critical habitat, he or she must recommend the federal cabinet extend SARA's prohibitions to that habitat. To date, this power has not been used nor has it been tested by the courts.

While it is not yet clear how the federal government (or a court) would define effective protection, it is possible that the test established in this recent decision for "equivalent protection" could be applied to the question of whether a species' critical habitat is being "effectively protected" by a province. In such case, the question then facing the federal government would be whether a province is protecting critical habitat in a manner equivalent to SARA. Given that few provincial or territorial laws protecting endangered species habitat are currently likely to meet this test, this decision may enhance the potential for the broader application of SARA's strict prohibitions across the country to species, such as the boreal caribou, which have been historically regulated by the provinces.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
26 Oct 2018, Other, Vancouver, Canada

Cybersecurity, including data privacy and security obligations, has become a critical chapter in every company’s risk management playbook.

30 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for discussions on recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits as well as employment law issues.

12 Nov 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Stories aren’t falsehoods. Stories are the root of all effective human communications: they motivate, animate and clarify. If you aren’t telling stories, you probably aren’t getting your point across.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions