Canada: Why Your Internal Communications May Be At Risk

Last Updated: November 4 2010
Article by Stuart Richards, Antonina Cuffaro and Antonio Di Domenico


The European Court of Justice (the "ECJ") recently released a landmark decision, Akzo1, confirming that communications between in-house counsel and their internal clients are not protected under European competition law by legal professional privilege, otherwise known in Canada as solicitor-client privilege. 

The ECJ's decision in Akzo transcends the boundaries of Europe.  It has profound global implications with respect to how legal advice is sought and received in the area of anti-trust/competition law.  For example, companies faced with cartel exposure can be subject to worldwide enforcement activity, a multiplicity of domestic amnesty programs and a surge of complex civil litigation.  This has given rise to an integrated global team of in-house and external lawyers working on behalf of an implicated company.   

The onus is now squarely on companies – notwithstanding their location - to take affirmative steps to protect their legal communications.   Companies, in conjunction with their in-house and external lawyers, need to carefully structure their global legal communications in order to maximize the application of privilege over legal communications and documents.  


Background Facts

In 2003, the European Commission (the "Commission") ordered Akzo Nobel Chemical and its subsidiary Akcros Chemicals to submit to an investigation aimed at seeking evidence of possible anti-competitive practices.  The Commission conducted searches or 'dawn raids' at the premises of Akzo Nobel and Akcros.  In so doing, the Commission seized two emails exchanged between the managing director and an in-house lawyer for Akzo Nobel, amongst other documents.  The in-house lawyer was an Advocaat of the Netherlands Bar.  The Commission analyzed the two e-mails and decided that they were not protected by legal professional privilege.

Akzo Chemicals claimed that the two emails should be protected by legal professional privilege.  Their claim was rejected by the Commission2, the General Court (previously named the Court of First Instance)3 and most recently by the European Court of Justice.      

The ECJ Decision

Akzo Chemicals, along with a number of intervenors (including the British, Irish and Dutch governments and a number of European Lawyers' and Bar Associations), claimed that the General Court wrongly refused to protect the two emails with legal professional privilege. 

They encouraged the ECJ to revisit its longstanding decision in AM & S Europe v Commission4 regarding legal professional privilege.  In AM & S, the ECJ held that exchanges between a lawyer and its client are protected by legal professional privilege at the EU level subject to two conditions:

  • the exchange with the lawyer must be connected to the client's right of defence in relation to the Commission's investigation and;
  • the exchange must emanate from an independent and external lawyer entitled to practise in the European Economic Area (EEA).

Akzo and the intervenors submitted that the criterion that the lawyer must be independent cannot be interpreted to exclude in-house lawyers and that an in-house lawyer enrolled as a Bar or Law Society is, on account of his or her obligation of professional conduct and discipline, as independent as an external lawyer.  In dismissing this submission and adopting the reasoning in AM & S, the ECJ observed that the concept of an independent lawyer is premised upon that lawyer's ability to collaborate in the administration of justice and to provide legal advice in full independence of all other interests but the client's.    Full independence, in the ECJ's view, included the absence of any employment relationship between the lawyer and his client.  Therefore, legal professional privilege did not protect written communications within a company with in-house lawyers, including the two emails at issue.   The ECJ noted: in-house lawyer cannot, whatever guarantees he has in the exercise of his profession, be treated in the same way as an external lawyer, because he occupies the position of an employee which, by its nature, does not allow him to ignore the commercial strategies pursued by his employer, and thereby affects his ability to exercise professional independence.5


Scope of Akzo in the EU

Akzo sets out the position on privilege only under EU anti-trust/competition law investigations conducted by the Commission.  When an anti-trust/competition investigation is carried out by a national authority in a Member State (such as the Office of Fair Trading in the UK), even if such investigation is carried out on behalf of the Commission, any in-house communications will be protected by national rules on legal professional privilege (see below for the position in England).  The EU principles will only apply where the Commission investigates directly in anti-trust/competition law matters.  This will not, however, provide much comfort to companies trying to determine whether advice from their in-house lawyers may end up before the Commission.

Solicitor-Client Privilege – Canada

It is well known in Canada that the purpose of solicitor-client privilege is to facilitate full and frank communication between a lawyer and client in the seeking and giving of legal advice.  In Canada, solicitor-privilege applies to:  (1) communications between a solicitor and client; (2) involving the seeking or giving of legal advice; and (3) where the communication is intended to be confidential by the parties.6   

In-house counsel in Canada are governed by the same rules of solicitor-client privilege as external counsel.  As the court in one leading Canadian case noted:  

There appears to be no doubt that salaried legal advisers of a corporation are regarded in law as in every respect in the same position as those who practise on their own account. They and their clients, even though there is only the one client, have the same privileges and the same duties as their practising counterparts.7 

While solicitor-client privilege applies equally to in-house counsel and external counsel, there are unique features of in-house counsel's position and functions that complicate the application of solicitor-client privilege to the documents they prepare and distribute.  Solicitor-client privilege protects legal advice.  It does not protect advice on purely business matters even when provided by a lawyer.  This distinction, while trite, can be complicated when in-house counsel has multiple corporate responsibilities, such as being a corporate secretary or a member of the board of directors.  Courts have, and will, refuse to protect a communication from in-house counsel with solicitor-client privilege if the communication was circulated in the in-house counsel's capacity as a business executive rather than a lawyer.8 

Legal Professional Privilege - England

English law recognises that communications with in-house counsel are capable of being protected by legal professional privilege.  An in-house lawyer is regarded in the same way as an external lawyer, provided they are acting in their capacity as a lawyer and not an executive – as in Canada, advice on purely business matters is not protected.

There are two categories of legal professional privilege in English law.  Legal advice privilege applies to confidential communications (written or oral) which pass between a client and its lawyer, whether relating to a contentious or non-contentious matter, which have come into existence for the sole or dominant purpose of giving or receiving legal advice.  Litigation privilege applies to written or oral confidential communications between lawyer and client, lawyer and third party or client and third party (experts and witnesses), or other documents created by or on behalf of the client or the lawyer, but only if they were for the sole or dominant purpose of litigation which was reasonably contemplated, pending or existing at the time they came into existence. 


Worldwide enforcement activity against anti-competitive behaviour has given rise to an integrated global team of in-house and external lawyers working on behalf of an implicated company.  The scope of privilege for in-house lawyers in Europe, when compared with the privilege recognized in Canada and the United States, is greatly restricted.  In-house counsel for companies that are active in Europe must take affirmative steps to protect their legal communications and documents.  Some practical tips in this regard are as follows: 

  • Companies, in conjunction with their in-house and external lawyers, need to carefully structure their global legal communications (i.e. joint defence agreements, legal opinions, day-to-day communications) in order to maximize the application of privilege. 
  • Ensure any advice given to European companies by lawyers outside the EEA (including, of course, Canada) is signed off by a lawyer within the EEA.
  • Company officials should ensure that all communications with their in-house lawyer about anti-trust/competition matters and indeed any other sensitive matters are given orally; not in writing.  The in-house lawyer can then, if necessary, seek legal advice from an external lawyer.  Legal advice communicated between the external lawyer and the in-house lawyer should be marked "Legally Privileged and Confidential" protected by privilege.
  • Written communications involving legal advice should be marked on their face as "privileged and confidential" and/or "communication for the sole purpose of providing legal advice".    These documents should be stored in a separate file and clearly designated as containing privileged communications.  In the event of a search or 'dawn raid', these documents can be plainly identified as privileged.
  • Companies must train their employees to carefully prepare and label documents created for the purpose of seeking legal advice.
  • Email advice should be given by way of attached documents rather than in the body of the email and the attachment should be clearly identified as confidential and legally privileged.  This will present a barrier to immediate disclosure.9  
  • Circulate advice received from external lawyers only to the extent necessary and in original form, without amendment (otherwise privilege may be lost).
  • Ensure that recipients of any advice from external lawyers are aware of the confidential nature of the advice.
  • Update internal compliance procedures (including search or dawn raid manuals) to reflect the ECJ's decision in Akzo.


1. C-550/07 P Akzo Nobel Chemicals and Akcros Chemicals v Commission and Others, September 14, 2010 ("Akzo"). 

2. Commission Decision C (2003) 1533, May 3, 2003.

3. Case T-125/03 Akzo Nobel Chemicals and Akcros v. Commission, September 17, 2007.   

4. Case 155/79 AM & S v. Commission

5. Ibid., at para. 47. 

6. R. v. Solosky, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 821 at p. 835, affirmed in Pritchard v. Ontario (Human Rights Commission), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 809 at para. 15. 

7. IBM Canada Ltd. v. Xerox of Canada Ltd. [1978] 1 F.C. 513 at para. 9.

8. See, for example, in Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Leigh Instruments Ltd. (Trustee of) [1997] O.J. No. 1177. 

9. In its decision, the General Court confirmed that so long as a company can present officials conducting the dawn raid with evidence that certain documents are privileged, the company need not reveal the content of such documents and if the company can argue that even a cursory glance at the documents would reveal their contents, the inspectors are not allowed to take even that cursory glance. If the inspectors disagree with the company's identification of documents as privileged, the inspectors may seal and remove the documents until the dispute is resolved. However, the inspectors are precluded from accessing the documents until a decision has been adopted by the Commission allowing the company concerned to refer the matter to the General Court for determination.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.