Canada: Human Rights Tribunal Rules that it will not Second-Guess an IPRC Placement

Last Updated: October 18 2010
Article by Naomi E. Calla

Most Read Contributor in Canada, September 2016

On February 23, 2010, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario released its decision in Schafer v. Toronto District School Board, 2010 HRTO 403 (request for reconsideration denied 2010 HRTO 884), confirming that the role of the Tribunal is not to second-guess a student's Identification, Placement and Review Committee (IPRC) placement or recommended accommodations or supervise the implementation of an Individual Education Plan (IEP).

This human rights application was filed by Reva Schafer on behalf of her son Eli Schafer, and relates to his grade nine school year at Central Technical School in the Toronto District School Board. Eli had been identified as "exceptional" in the area of "learning disability/language" by decision of an IPRC. Mrs. Schafer alleged that Eli was denied equal treatment with respect to educational services because of disability, contrary to section 1 of the Ontario Human Rights Code (the Code) during his short tenure at the school. Among other things, the applicant alleged:

  1. The school failed to provide Eli with appropriate special education services in accordance with his disability-related needs.
  2. Two suspensions that were imposed on Eli were discriminatory, as the school did not take adequate account of Eli's disabilities in determining an appropriate penalty.
  3. That the second suspension stemmed from the school's failure to implement accommodations and an appropriate re-entry plan after the first suspension.
  4. The homework provided during the suspensions was inadequate.

In particular, the applicant alleged that the teachers, principal and vice-principal were not appropriately qualified and did not understand or appreciate fully Eli's special needs and the type of accommodations that he needed. Furthermore, the applicant alleged that the teachers did not provide the accommodations needed and that the vice-principal did not accommodate Eli during the investigation of two suspensions.

The hearing took place over several days and evidence was received from many witnesses, including Mrs. Schafer, most of the Eli's first semester teachers, the principal and vice-principal of Central Tech, the relevant superintendent and several special education personnel.

Alternate Chair Joachim found that the evidence established that Eli's first term teachers were aware of his special needs and had incorporated accommodations early in the school year. In particular, the teachers testified that they reformatted tests, provided additional time on tests, extended deadlines on assignments, provided preferential seating near the front of the class, refocused Eli during class, encouraged movement breaks, provided material in smaller "chunks", offered additional one-on one instruction outside regular class hours and provided constant encouragement and direction.

The Tribunal recognized that Central Tech has a high percentage of special education students. Accordingly, it found that the teachers are attuned to the need to provide accommodations for many of their students and many of the accommodations required by Eli were equally applicable to other students.

With respect to Eli's first suspension, the Tribunal found that its task was not to second-guess the TDSB's decision to suspend or the length of the suspension. The Tribunal stated that its focus was on whether Eli's special needs were considered in the suspension process. Alternate Chair Joachim concluded, "There is no question in my mind that the TDSB did consider the applicant's special needs throughout the process and accommodated them."

With respect to homework during the suspension, the Tribunal found that the TDSB provided homework to Eli during the suspension and properly prepared for his re-entry into the school.

In reviewing the second suspension, the Tribunal held that the TDSB was justified in concluding that Eli had engaged in serious misconduct and that the Board reduced the length of suspension in light of Eli's learning needs. Again, the Tribunal confirmed that it will not overly scrutinize the specific discipline decision, but it was satisfied that the TDSB "properly considered the applicant's special needs".

Overall, the Tribunal concluded that the TDSB did not breach the applicant's rights under the Code. In this regard, the application against the TDSB was dismissed.

Special Education and the Human Rights Tribunal

In her reasons, Alternate Chair Joachim held that a failure to accommodate within the meaning of the Code does not mean that a school failed to meet a parent's expectations. However, what is likely to be the decision's long-term impact is the position the Tribunal took regarding the scope of its ability to review alleged human rights violations relating to special education.

During the hearing, Mrs. Schafer alleged that the TDSB did not comply with the Education Act, TDSB policy, that the procedures they used were not fair and that the school did not implement the accommodations listed in Eli's IPRC or latest IEP.

The Tribunal held that it is not it's role to oversee the implementation of the Education Act. Whether or not a school board strictly followed the procedures to arrange IPRC's or prepare IEP's is not for the Tribunal to determine. The Tribunal stated that so long as there are steps taken to assess the child's needs and prepare accommodations, then generally the procedural standard of the duty to accommodate will be met.

The Tribunal ruled that as long as the substantive accommodations as recommended by the IPRC and IEP are generally implemented, the substantive standard of the duty to accommodate will be met. It stated:

The issue is not whether the accommodations implemented are what the student or parent wanted, whether they were the ideal accommodation, or whether other accommodations would have been equally appropriate. The simple question is this; did the school board implement accommodations (generally, but not necessarily as recommended by the IPRC or IEP) that met the child's special needs?

As a result of the Schafer decision, the Tribunal has sent a clear message that it is not an alternative or substitute body to monitor and regulate the special education scheme under the Education Act. The Tribunal held that it will not second-guess the IPRC placement and recommended accommodations and will not supervise a school's implementation of an IEP. It will be helpful for school boards, parents and relevant stakeholders to know that in order to establish discrimination under the Code, the evidence must demonstrate that the accommodations provided were "significantly inappropriate or inadequate."

With respect to future cases before the Tribunal, the Schafer decision may serve to eliminate or, at least limit, the scope of many human rights applications that purport to question the appropriateness of accommodations or programs provided to students with special needs.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.