Canada: Lessons From Magna

Published in the September 2010 issue of Lexpert magazine as part of Barry Reiter's regular column.

Some say the 863 million offered in exchange for Frank Stronach's multiple-voting hares as outrageous." hat, however, is matter best left to shareholders

A proposal by Magna International Inc. to reorga-nize its capital structure and eliminate a class of multiple-voting shares has raised a fuss. It also raises interesting governance issues.

The Magna share structure gives holders of Class A subordinate shares one vote, while holders of Class B shares receive 300 votes per share. As a result, with only 0.6 per cent of Magna's total equity, Stronach Trust (controlled by Chairman Frank Stronach and his family) holds 66 per cent of Magna's votes.

This kind of capital structure has become unusual in Canada.

In 1987, the TSX required companies intending to list dual- class structures to attach "coattail" provisions to the superior class. Coattails prevent the controlling shareholder from receiving a premium for the superior shares by requiring that any take- over bid made for the superior class be made contemporaneously for the subordinate shares as well.

The Magna Class B shares, dating from 1978, have no coat- tails. They also have no "sunset provisions," which in the 1990s became a common way to limit the impact of dual share classes by eliminating superiority in specified circumstances (e.g., aft er the passage of time, after equity ownership of the holders falls below some threshold, upon transfer of the superior shares).

The value of the Magna Class A shares has always been thought to be subject to a "Stronach discount" on the basis that control of the company could be achieved by acquisition of the Class B shares only, and that the timing of liquidity for Mag-na shareholders would be fully at the discretion of the Class B shareholders (namely, the Stronach family).

In March 2010, Magna management approached Stronach to try to interest him in eliminating Magna's multiple-voting structure. After about a month of discussion, management informed Magna's board about the initiative and the board established an independent directors' committee to address a proposal that had emerged. Th e committee conducted a review process and held one (and apparently only one) negotiating session with Stronach, in the context of a "final take-it-or-leave-it offer."

Stronach Trust agreed to sell its Class B shares to Magna for a rich deal: Magna would deliver Class A shares and cash (valuing Class B shares at a premium of some 1,800 per cent over Class A shares), plus a five-year consulting contract for Frank Stronach and equity and voting interests in an electric car partnership between Magna and Stronach Trust. Th e deal, all in, was widely reported to be costing Magna $863 million.

In May, the board determined to put this offer to a share- holder vote, requiring approval by a simple majority of the Class A votes, structuring the transaction as a plan of arrangement (which would therefore require court approval), and making no voting recommendation to shareholders. While the board had obtained advice from its financial advisor, CIBC, it had not obtained a fairness opinion: CIBC said it was unable to provide one because the dilution associated with the deal was unprecedented and the benefit to shareholders would depend on the future trading value of Magna's shares.

When the proposal was announced on May 6, the price of Magna's Class A shares jumped significantly, and institutional shareholders and their advisor groups quickly came down on different sides. RiskMetrics recommended that its clients vote in favour because of the potential benefits of the "one share, one vote" structure, including elimination of the trading discount, enhanced accountability of the directors, greater access to capital and the removal of an impediment to potential take-over interest. RiskMetrics thought that these benefits outweighed the high price and "corporate governance concerns."

Meanwhile, Glass Lewis & Co., a proxy advisor and wholly owned subsidiary of the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan, recommended its clients vote against the deal. Teachers was concerned that Stronach was being permitted to extract "outrageous" premiums from Magna under the guise of normalizing its governance structure, and that better disclosure and guidance to shareholders were necessary to maintain the integrity of capital markets.

At the end of May, Magna issued its proxy circular, providing some background and urging shareholders to vote. It described the special committee's involvement and presented its conclusion that the proposal should be put to a shareholder vote with- out any committee recommendation. The Magna board made no voting recommendation. The circular did not include presentations that had been prepared by CIBC for the special committee (deal analysis) or by PricewaterhouseCoopers (estimated fair market value of Magna's vehicle-electrification business).

Intense debate ensued. Eventually, Ontario Securities Commission staff decided to intervene on the basis that the proxy circular had not contained adequate disclosure, the board had not provided useful recommendations, and the approval and review process followed by the board had been inadequate. The OSC held an expedited hearing and issued a short statement in support of its conclusions, with more detailed reasons to follow.

The Commission determined that a transaction such as this would not be abusive of shareholders or Ontario's capital markets "simply because the price proposed to be paid is considered by certain investors to be outrageous." On the evidence before it, the OSC was unable to come to a view as to whether or not the proposed transaction was unfair. The OSC concluded that the best way to determine fairness would be to simply allow shareholders of Magna to either approve or reject the deal: this was ultimately a business and financial decision for those shareholders.

However, the OSC did have significant concerns about the governance process and the disclosure made to shareholders. Under Ontario securities law, the proxy circular must describe the substance of matters to be voted on in sufficient detail to enable the shareholder to form a reasoned judgment about how to vote. In the circumstances of this case – a complex, related-party transaction with no voting recommendation, no fairness opinion and consideration that was hard to evaluate – the OSC felt that shareholders were inadequately informed.

The OSC also felt that, in a situation of this sort, the disclosure in the circular must, to the extent reasonably possible, provide shareholders with substantially the same information and analysis that the special committee received. It listed a dozen items that it felt should be better disclosed in the circular, including detail on the review and approval process of the special committee, disclosure of the CIBC and PwC reports, clarity as to how CIBC assessed the proposed transaction and a reasoning as to why CIBC could not issue a fairness opinion.

The OSC noted that, while there was no legal requirement for a voting recommendation or a fairness opinion, the fact that neither was provided had implications for the disclosure required. The OSC also had "some concerns with the process followed by the board, the special committee and management in reviewing and deciding to submit the proposed transaction to shareholders for approval." Accordingly, the OSC issued an order preventing the shareholder vote from proceeding until Magna delivered an amended circular complying with these requirements.

A Measured Response

There appears to be much to commend both in the OSC's decision and in the reasoning it has provided so far. The Commission declined the opportunity to interfere in a substantive way, for instance, by deciding that the consideration proposed was unfairly expensive when compared with what shareholders were to receive — this, the OSC concluded, was a matter to be determined by the shareholders.

That being said, shareholders needed to be in a position to understand and assess their interests, and they needed to be well represented in negotiations on the deal put before them. On the first point, the OSC was clear that, particularly in the context of directors who were making no recommendation, the shareholders had to be given effectively the same information as had been given to the directors, so that they could form their views on an informed basis.

On the second point, the OSC appeared to be critical of management, which had largely driven the discussions with Stronach before involving the board, and of the special committee, which it appears to regard as not having pressed Stronach hard enough to provide confidence that the deal put to the shareholders was the best that could have been extracted. In expressing these views, the OSC is following a long line of decisions of the leading US corporate court (Delaware Chancery) in emphasizing the need for a special committee of disinterested directors to exercise leadership, and to have documented evidence to prove that it is doing so.

Further independent criticism of the board has argued that shareholders were entitled to a recommendation one way or another from the directors, who had engaged in a detailed review of a complex deal that management was supporting strongly. The amended circular that Magna filed expressed a special committee view that the deal will be fair and reasonable if shareholders approve it and the court subsequently approves the plan of arrangement. And special committee members have said that, as individual shareholders, they are in favour.

On July 23, a few weeks before this column went to press, Magna shareholders voted 75.3 per cent in favour of the deal, which would end Stronach's control over Magna. But at least some investors have vowed to carry on the fight in court (at the arrangement hearing). Whatever the ultimate outcome, directors are well-advised to consider the lessons of Magna as they approach related-party matters in the future.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions