Canada: Going Global: How Canadian Companies View Intellectual Property

Last Updated: August 31 2010
Article by John P. Beardwood and Mark D. Penner

Introduction

Recognizing, protecting and exploiting Intellectual Property ("IP") assets has never been more important to businesses. While capturing the benefits of innovation can make the difference between profitability and demise, there are numerous and competing priorities on companies' time, money, and attention that make doing so a challenge.

In order to assist our clients more efficiently and effectively manage their IP within this competitive and challenging marketplace, Fasken Martineau conducted a survey of a number of Canadian companies as to how these companies view the importance, value and role of IP in their business. The following analysis of the results of our survey will help our clients secure more effective IP protection, more effectively manage the IP development process and reduce the risk posed by third party IP.

Respondents View IP As Driving Their Business Model

A majority of our 2009 survey respondents know and understand that IP is important to their business. Almost 80% of respondents consider IP to be a key or top priority, while only 6% consider IP to be a low priority.

Our survey respondents also have a clear, and remarkably uniform, view of the role that IP plays within their organizations. Two thirds of the respondents surveyed reported that IP plays a significant role in generating revenue for their company (for example, through licensing). A majority of respondents also indicated that IP "distinguishes" their company in the marketplace (60%) and "creates barriers for competitors" (56%).

The fact that 62% of the respondents indicated that one of the key roles of IP within the business was to "increase the company's valuation" suggests that most respondents understand the value of IP as an asset. Further, 44% of respondents considered that one role of IP was to "attract investment."

Global IP Outlook: Looking beyond Canada to Secure IP Protection

IP protection in countries other than Canada is clearly important for the Canadian companies surveyed, as two thirds of the respondents report that they sell products or make their services available outside Canada. Of those respondents that do sell products or offer services outside of Canada, 69% indicated that they have sought IP protection outside of Canada. The overwhelming majority (91%) of the respondents who sought protection outside of Canada indicated they had sought to protect their IP rights within the United States. However, other jurisdictions appear to also be key, including Europe (73%), the United Kingdom (55%), Japan (50%), India (36%) and China (32%). This not only reflects the growing role that these countries are playing within an ever increasing global market, but – in the case of India and China - may also reflect a perception that IP protection in these jurisdictions is becoming more effective, such that it justifies companies making the effort to obtain such protection.

What IP Do Respondents Own

A significant majority (96%) of respondents indicated that they owned some form of IP. When considering IP issues in greater detail, however, our survey results illustrated a disconnect between the acknowledged importance of IP, and a more specific understanding as to the nature of each IP asset and how to best leverage those assets. The breakdown of how the various rights are owned is as follows:

  • While over half of respondents (56%) indicated that they owned copyright; 44% of respondents appear to have not recognized those copyright assets which they did possess. While it may of lesser importance to some survey respondents, it is likely that all respondents have some copyrighted material (i.e. manuals and other user documentation, websites, etc.). As such, we would expect that the number of responses confirming copyright ownership to be at 100%. Copyright arises from the act of creation (i.e. registration of that copyright, while in many cases advisable, is not required) and would therefore apply to a wide variety of material which would be significant to those respondents developing software, as copyright remains a primary means by which software is protected.
  • A significant majority of the respondents surveyed (70%) indicated that they owned trade-marks. Like copyright, it is surprising that less than 100% of respondents recognized that they owned a trademark: each company generally will have at least one trade-mark, whether or not it has registered that mark. The response may reflect a lack of understanding that trade-marks can arise through simply using any word, symbol, logo, slogan, etc. or combination thereof that identifies the wares and/or services of one company from those of another (referred to as "common law rights") – that is, trade-marks do not arise through registration only.
  • Only fifty percent of the respondents in 2009 indicated that they owned trade secrets. "Trade secrets" per se are a concept under U.S. law, the Canadian equivalent of which a confidentiality obligations. Given that trade secrets therefore are effectively a form of confidential information that has some commercial value (e.g. customer lists, supplier information, etc.), respondents would appear to be significantly underestimating the trade secrets held by each company.
  • Given the predominance of technology-focused respondents in the survey (e.g. life science/biotech and technology/communication); it was not surprising that patent ownership was at 60%.
  • Notwithstanding the respondents' recognition of the significance of IP ownership and its importance for asset production and revenue generation, only 31% of survey respondents had had the value of their IP assets assessed, and of these, the majority of these assessments were completed without professional evaluation. As a result, almost three quarters of the respondents will have very little idea as to the value of their IP assets. It goes without saying that this is inadvisable for a business, just as it would be inadvisable for any other asset, for among other reasons because it means the business cannot effectively leverage those assets to facilitate debt or equity financing.

Failing to Minimize the Risks Associated With Third-Party IP

Based on the responses, the most significant instances of IP "licensing-in" (i.e. in contrast to a company "licensing-out" their IP) are in the fields of patents (46%) and copyright (39%). Despite this, however, it appears that the 2009 survey respondents are not fully taking into account other types of IP licenses from third parties: nearly 40% of the companies surveyed claimed that they did not license any IP rights from third parties. This number is perhaps partially explained (a) by the failure of the respondents to take into account off-the-shelf software products like Microsoft Office, and (b) by what may be the strategic decision of certain of the respondents to develop and market products to neither use any third party IP in their products, nor bundle their products with licensed third-party products to create a single solution.

IP Management

71% of respondents polled indicated that they have a formal policy governing IP issues, such as disclosure of inventions and employee development. While a majority of respondents appear to take the protection and ownership of IP rights very seriously, that still means that almost one third have not implemented any formal IP policies. This is a significant gap for two reasons. First, the absence of such policies increases the probability of there being disputes regarding IP ownership in the future. Second, in our experience, one of the first pieces of data an investor will evaluate in assessing the status of a target's IP portfolio (after review the existence of actual IP registrations) is the existence of and degree of compliance with such a policy. Given that 62% of the respondents indicated that one of the key roles of IP within the business was to "increase the company's valuation", the failure to have an IP policy is problematic. Indeed, over two-thirds (69%) of the respondents agreed that their company's "IP strategy requires improvement."

The failure to implement effective IP strategies also appears to raise issues in the context of the licensing-out of respondent-owned IP. While 55% indicated that they had licensed out IP, almost a third were "somewhat uncomfortable" with providing the licensee with representations and warranties regarding IP ownership and infringement. An effective IP policy plays a significant role in addressing that discomfort.

Assessing and Managing IP: Risks and Rewards

Before launching a new business, product or service, 39% of companies indicated that they would conduct a market analysis of existing businesses, products or services. 20% indicated they would search IP databases. Searching IP databases is one of the best steps that can be taken to help avoid particular IP disputes. While there are some costs associated with conducting IP searches, the relatively minor investment can pay off significantly by identifying IP risks and helping to eliminate the much more significant costs associated with IP litigation.

Perhaps more importantly, before going to market, a company should at least confirm its own internal records regarding ownership of IP directed to that business, product or service. Only 17% of the respondents took this step: a large majority of respondents still fail to adopt this relatively simple measure. Each company should ensure that it has completed its own internal IP due diligence, including obtaining assignments of copyright and waivers of copyright from its personnel, prior to going to market with its product. In the latter case. it is important that each company take such measures to confirm ownership of IP internally to avoid personnel contesting ownership, in particular where such personnel may then be hired by a competitor.

While the vast majority of companies surveyed (more than 67%) indicated they sell products or make services available outside of Canada, slightly more than one quarter of the respondents had taken no steps to identify third-party IP rights in applicable foreign jurisdictions. This level of risk mitigation does not correlate well with the global scope of the activities of many of the respondents.

In summary, it is difficult to overstate the importance of conducting sufficient IP due diligence prior to taking a product or service to market. Such due diligence assists the respondent to avoid not only infringement claims by third party owners of IP, but also breach of contract and/or indemnity claims by the respondent's licensees or purchasers, given that each licensee or purchaser will likely require that the respondent provide contractual representations, warranties and/or indemnities regarding ownership and non-infringement. 31% indicated they were somewhat uncomfortable with the representations and warranties regarding ownership and non-infringement. However, in contrast, sixty-nine percent of respondents indicated that they were either very or somewhat comfortable with these representations and warranties regarding ownership and non-infringement, a result which is difficult to reconcile with the fact that over 80% of the respondents failed to complete any internal IP due diligence prior to taking a product or service to market.

IP Disputes

The adoption of an IP strategy that includes the implementation of an IP policy, the registration of IP and the conduct of IP searches prior to going to market is, of course, intended to forestall the emergence of IP disputes. In 2009, a very significant 43% of respondents indicated that they had been involved in an IP- related dispute. While the majority of those disputes were in Canada (73%), a large number took place in the United States (47%) and Europe (33%). Over half (54%) of the respondents indicated that the litigation significantly or somewhat altered or impacted their business plan; surprisingly, 47% indicated that the litigation had no impact.

Of the IP assets involved in the dispute, 54% involved patents and 31% involved trade-marks, notwithstanding that in the case of those IP assets appropriate IP searches would have assisted in identifying any existing third party patent or trade-mark rights (all issued patents and registered trade-marks are publicly available for searching).

In summary, while searching is somewhat less useful for copyright, trade secrets and common law trade-mark rights where there is no registration requirement for these IP rights to be effective, searching is still one of the most cost effective means of reducing the risk of an unexpected IP dispute. Put another way, a sophisticated business should no more omit looking at the IP landscape relevant to a proposed or modified product, then it should omit conducting a market analysis prior to developing and taking to market a new product or service. Yet the results from our respondents do not reflect this logic.

One means of helping to offset the costs of IP litigation is insurance. In recent years, insurance policies for IP infringement claims have become more commonplace. However, the vast majority of respondents (72%) have not sought any advice from their insurance provider.

Conclusion

Upon reviewing our 2009 survey results, a number of themes emerge. First, Canadian companies continue to view IP as driving their business model, and that further, when considering IP protection and enforcement, a high percentage of respondents are adopting a more global outlook. Second, the 2009 survey results evidence that there is often a significant disconnect between the respondents' general understanding of the importance of IP and their more specific understanding as to the nature of each IP asset in their businesses and how to best leverage those assets. Third, a surprising number of respondents polled indicated they had already been involved in a legal dispute involving IP. Finally, despite this litigation risk, respondents have been slow in adopting the appropriate risk mitigation strategies. It remains to be seen whether in tough economic times this was the right choice - the results of the 2010 survey will be revealing in this regard.

www.fasken.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions