Canada: Going Global: How Canadian Companies View Intellectual Property

Last Updated: August 31 2010
Article by John P. Beardwood and Mark D. Penner


Recognizing, protecting and exploiting Intellectual Property ("IP") assets has never been more important to businesses. While capturing the benefits of innovation can make the difference between profitability and demise, there are numerous and competing priorities on companies' time, money, and attention that make doing so a challenge.

In order to assist our clients more efficiently and effectively manage their IP within this competitive and challenging marketplace, Fasken Martineau conducted a survey of a number of Canadian companies as to how these companies view the importance, value and role of IP in their business. The following analysis of the results of our survey will help our clients secure more effective IP protection, more effectively manage the IP development process and reduce the risk posed by third party IP.

Respondents View IP As Driving Their Business Model

A majority of our 2009 survey respondents know and understand that IP is important to their business. Almost 80% of respondents consider IP to be a key or top priority, while only 6% consider IP to be a low priority.

Our survey respondents also have a clear, and remarkably uniform, view of the role that IP plays within their organizations. Two thirds of the respondents surveyed reported that IP plays a significant role in generating revenue for their company (for example, through licensing). A majority of respondents also indicated that IP "distinguishes" their company in the marketplace (60%) and "creates barriers for competitors" (56%).

The fact that 62% of the respondents indicated that one of the key roles of IP within the business was to "increase the company's valuation" suggests that most respondents understand the value of IP as an asset. Further, 44% of respondents considered that one role of IP was to "attract investment."

Global IP Outlook: Looking beyond Canada to Secure IP Protection

IP protection in countries other than Canada is clearly important for the Canadian companies surveyed, as two thirds of the respondents report that they sell products or make their services available outside Canada. Of those respondents that do sell products or offer services outside of Canada, 69% indicated that they have sought IP protection outside of Canada. The overwhelming majority (91%) of the respondents who sought protection outside of Canada indicated they had sought to protect their IP rights within the United States. However, other jurisdictions appear to also be key, including Europe (73%), the United Kingdom (55%), Japan (50%), India (36%) and China (32%). This not only reflects the growing role that these countries are playing within an ever increasing global market, but – in the case of India and China - may also reflect a perception that IP protection in these jurisdictions is becoming more effective, such that it justifies companies making the effort to obtain such protection.

What IP Do Respondents Own

A significant majority (96%) of respondents indicated that they owned some form of IP. When considering IP issues in greater detail, however, our survey results illustrated a disconnect between the acknowledged importance of IP, and a more specific understanding as to the nature of each IP asset and how to best leverage those assets. The breakdown of how the various rights are owned is as follows:

  • While over half of respondents (56%) indicated that they owned copyright; 44% of respondents appear to have not recognized those copyright assets which they did possess. While it may of lesser importance to some survey respondents, it is likely that all respondents have some copyrighted material (i.e. manuals and other user documentation, websites, etc.). As such, we would expect that the number of responses confirming copyright ownership to be at 100%. Copyright arises from the act of creation (i.e. registration of that copyright, while in many cases advisable, is not required) and would therefore apply to a wide variety of material which would be significant to those respondents developing software, as copyright remains a primary means by which software is protected.
  • A significant majority of the respondents surveyed (70%) indicated that they owned trade-marks. Like copyright, it is surprising that less than 100% of respondents recognized that they owned a trademark: each company generally will have at least one trade-mark, whether or not it has registered that mark. The response may reflect a lack of understanding that trade-marks can arise through simply using any word, symbol, logo, slogan, etc. or combination thereof that identifies the wares and/or services of one company from those of another (referred to as "common law rights") – that is, trade-marks do not arise through registration only.
  • Only fifty percent of the respondents in 2009 indicated that they owned trade secrets. "Trade secrets" per se are a concept under U.S. law, the Canadian equivalent of which a confidentiality obligations. Given that trade secrets therefore are effectively a form of confidential information that has some commercial value (e.g. customer lists, supplier information, etc.), respondents would appear to be significantly underestimating the trade secrets held by each company.
  • Given the predominance of technology-focused respondents in the survey (e.g. life science/biotech and technology/communication); it was not surprising that patent ownership was at 60%.
  • Notwithstanding the respondents' recognition of the significance of IP ownership and its importance for asset production and revenue generation, only 31% of survey respondents had had the value of their IP assets assessed, and of these, the majority of these assessments were completed without professional evaluation. As a result, almost three quarters of the respondents will have very little idea as to the value of their IP assets. It goes without saying that this is inadvisable for a business, just as it would be inadvisable for any other asset, for among other reasons because it means the business cannot effectively leverage those assets to facilitate debt or equity financing.

Failing to Minimize the Risks Associated With Third-Party IP

Based on the responses, the most significant instances of IP "licensing-in" (i.e. in contrast to a company "licensing-out" their IP) are in the fields of patents (46%) and copyright (39%). Despite this, however, it appears that the 2009 survey respondents are not fully taking into account other types of IP licenses from third parties: nearly 40% of the companies surveyed claimed that they did not license any IP rights from third parties. This number is perhaps partially explained (a) by the failure of the respondents to take into account off-the-shelf software products like Microsoft Office, and (b) by what may be the strategic decision of certain of the respondents to develop and market products to neither use any third party IP in their products, nor bundle their products with licensed third-party products to create a single solution.

IP Management

71% of respondents polled indicated that they have a formal policy governing IP issues, such as disclosure of inventions and employee development. While a majority of respondents appear to take the protection and ownership of IP rights very seriously, that still means that almost one third have not implemented any formal IP policies. This is a significant gap for two reasons. First, the absence of such policies increases the probability of there being disputes regarding IP ownership in the future. Second, in our experience, one of the first pieces of data an investor will evaluate in assessing the status of a target's IP portfolio (after review the existence of actual IP registrations) is the existence of and degree of compliance with such a policy. Given that 62% of the respondents indicated that one of the key roles of IP within the business was to "increase the company's valuation", the failure to have an IP policy is problematic. Indeed, over two-thirds (69%) of the respondents agreed that their company's "IP strategy requires improvement."

The failure to implement effective IP strategies also appears to raise issues in the context of the licensing-out of respondent-owned IP. While 55% indicated that they had licensed out IP, almost a third were "somewhat uncomfortable" with providing the licensee with representations and warranties regarding IP ownership and infringement. An effective IP policy plays a significant role in addressing that discomfort.

Assessing and Managing IP: Risks and Rewards

Before launching a new business, product or service, 39% of companies indicated that they would conduct a market analysis of existing businesses, products or services. 20% indicated they would search IP databases. Searching IP databases is one of the best steps that can be taken to help avoid particular IP disputes. While there are some costs associated with conducting IP searches, the relatively minor investment can pay off significantly by identifying IP risks and helping to eliminate the much more significant costs associated with IP litigation.

Perhaps more importantly, before going to market, a company should at least confirm its own internal records regarding ownership of IP directed to that business, product or service. Only 17% of the respondents took this step: a large majority of respondents still fail to adopt this relatively simple measure. Each company should ensure that it has completed its own internal IP due diligence, including obtaining assignments of copyright and waivers of copyright from its personnel, prior to going to market with its product. In the latter case. it is important that each company take such measures to confirm ownership of IP internally to avoid personnel contesting ownership, in particular where such personnel may then be hired by a competitor.

While the vast majority of companies surveyed (more than 67%) indicated they sell products or make services available outside of Canada, slightly more than one quarter of the respondents had taken no steps to identify third-party IP rights in applicable foreign jurisdictions. This level of risk mitigation does not correlate well with the global scope of the activities of many of the respondents.

In summary, it is difficult to overstate the importance of conducting sufficient IP due diligence prior to taking a product or service to market. Such due diligence assists the respondent to avoid not only infringement claims by third party owners of IP, but also breach of contract and/or indemnity claims by the respondent's licensees or purchasers, given that each licensee or purchaser will likely require that the respondent provide contractual representations, warranties and/or indemnities regarding ownership and non-infringement. 31% indicated they were somewhat uncomfortable with the representations and warranties regarding ownership and non-infringement. However, in contrast, sixty-nine percent of respondents indicated that they were either very or somewhat comfortable with these representations and warranties regarding ownership and non-infringement, a result which is difficult to reconcile with the fact that over 80% of the respondents failed to complete any internal IP due diligence prior to taking a product or service to market.

IP Disputes

The adoption of an IP strategy that includes the implementation of an IP policy, the registration of IP and the conduct of IP searches prior to going to market is, of course, intended to forestall the emergence of IP disputes. In 2009, a very significant 43% of respondents indicated that they had been involved in an IP- related dispute. While the majority of those disputes were in Canada (73%), a large number took place in the United States (47%) and Europe (33%). Over half (54%) of the respondents indicated that the litigation significantly or somewhat altered or impacted their business plan; surprisingly, 47% indicated that the litigation had no impact.

Of the IP assets involved in the dispute, 54% involved patents and 31% involved trade-marks, notwithstanding that in the case of those IP assets appropriate IP searches would have assisted in identifying any existing third party patent or trade-mark rights (all issued patents and registered trade-marks are publicly available for searching).

In summary, while searching is somewhat less useful for copyright, trade secrets and common law trade-mark rights where there is no registration requirement for these IP rights to be effective, searching is still one of the most cost effective means of reducing the risk of an unexpected IP dispute. Put another way, a sophisticated business should no more omit looking at the IP landscape relevant to a proposed or modified product, then it should omit conducting a market analysis prior to developing and taking to market a new product or service. Yet the results from our respondents do not reflect this logic.

One means of helping to offset the costs of IP litigation is insurance. In recent years, insurance policies for IP infringement claims have become more commonplace. However, the vast majority of respondents (72%) have not sought any advice from their insurance provider.


Upon reviewing our 2009 survey results, a number of themes emerge. First, Canadian companies continue to view IP as driving their business model, and that further, when considering IP protection and enforcement, a high percentage of respondents are adopting a more global outlook. Second, the 2009 survey results evidence that there is often a significant disconnect between the respondents' general understanding of the importance of IP and their more specific understanding as to the nature of each IP asset in their businesses and how to best leverage those assets. Third, a surprising number of respondents polled indicated they had already been involved in a legal dispute involving IP. Finally, despite this litigation risk, respondents have been slow in adopting the appropriate risk mitigation strategies. It remains to be seen whether in tough economic times this was the right choice - the results of the 2010 survey will be revealing in this regard.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.