Canada: U.K. "Round the World" Scheme Grounded - Determining Where Central Management and Control Resides Becomes More Complicated

It was a bright and calm day when Mr. Smallwood, a U.K. resident, decided to suggest that a Jersey Trust of which he was the settlor, and in which he maintained an interest, should dispose of certain shares. Mr. Smallwood obtained advice from accountants in Bristol that if the trust sold the shares the gain would be attributed to him because of a provision in the taxing statute that would apply "if the trustees were not resident in the United Kingdom during any part of the year". The Bristol advisors then informed Mr. Smallwood that there was an off-the-peg "Round the World" tax scheme that was intended to eliminate the tax. At this point, the storm clouds began to gather.

The RTW scheme

In implementing the RTW scheme, the Jersey trustee was replaced on December 19, 2000 with a Mauritius trustee, and the Mauritius trustee was in turn replaced by Mr. and Mrs. Smallwood as trustees on March 2, 2001, prior to the April 5 tax year-end of the trust under U.K. tax law. The intention was that when the shares were sold during January of 2001 the trust's capital gain would be protected from U.K. tax by virtue of the provisions of the U.K.-Mauritius Tax Treaty. Further, as Mr. and Mrs. Smallwood, being U.K. residents, would be trustees "for part of the year" the attribution rule quoted in the preceding paragraph would not apply and no tax would be payable on the gain in the U.K.

Issues on appeal

The primary question was whether the Treaty applied to exempt the trust's gain from U.K. tax. The threshold issue was whether the matter of residence fell to be determined at the date of the disposal or more generally within the year of the disposition. Clearly the trust was, at least, resident in the U.K. from March 2 until April 5.

On July 8, 2010, the Court of Appeal held in HMRC v. Smallwood & Anor, [2010] EWCA Civ 778, that the issue of whether the taxpayer should be resident in a particular state at the time of disposal or at some other point in time is an issue for each state to decide as part of its own taxation regime. The Treaty must be assumed to have been drafted in a way that contemplates any tax treatment of capital gains based on residence or similar criteria. "Resident of a contracting state" means chargeable to tax in that state on account of residence and, for this purpose, one has to take into account the tax treatment of the gain under the domestic legislation of both contracting states regardless of the period of residence which gives rise to the liability. The Treaty accommodates legislation under which a gain is made taxable in the U.K. by virtue of residence in a period after the gain has occurred.

Place of effective management / central management and control

The Court concluded that the trust was resident in both Mauritius and the U.K. under each jurisdiction's domestic legislation. The issue then fell to be determined under the tie-breaker rule in the Treaty based on the place of effective management ("POEM"). The judges referred to comments of Chadwick L.J. in Wood v. Holden, [2006] EWCA Civ 26, indicating that it was difficult to draw any distinction between the concepts of POEM and central management and control ("CMC"), the later being the terminology generally used to describe the test in cases dealing with the residence of corporations.

The Court referred to the OECD commentary on Article 4(3) of the Model Convention, which provides that "the POEM is the place where key management and commercial decisions that are necessary for the conduct of the entity's business are in substance made. An entity may have more than one place of management, but it can only have one place of effective management at any one time." What has to be identified is the place where the real top-level management of the trustee occurred rather than day-to-day administration of the trust.

It was found as a fact by the Special Commissioners that the appropriate meetings took place in Mauritius and the necessary resolutions were passed in Mauritius by the Mauritius trustee. The books and records were properly maintained. While there was a "confident expectation" that the Mauritius trustee would choose to sell the shares, there was no agreement that the trustee would behave in a certain way or would make certain decisions. Its duties as a trustee were laid down in the legislation. If it had not been in the interest of the beneficiaries, the trustee would not have sold the shares. For example, if the share price dropped dramatically, and if the fund manager had advised against the sale, then the trustee would have decided not to sell.

However, the facts surrounding the appointment of the Mauritius trustee led the Court to conclude that the real top level management, or the realistic, positive management of the trust, remained in the United Kingdom. The sale of the shares was motivated by U.K. tax planning reasons. The details relating to the actual sales were found to be low level management decisions, as there was no doubt the shares would be sold; the real top level management decisions or the realistic, positive management decisions of the trust, to dispose of all the shares in a tax efficient way, had already been, and continued to be, taken in the United Kingdom. Mr. Smallwood had the power to appoint new trustees.

With reference to Wood and DeBeers Consolidated Mines Ltd. v. Howe, [1906] AC 455, the Court adopted a two-prong test in deciding where POEM or CMC resides. The first question is whether (i) CMC is exercised through the constitutional organs of the vehicle in question, or (ii) the functions of those constitutional organs are usurped, as in Unit Construction v. Bullock, [1960] AC 351. If the functions have not been usurped, the test requires that a second question be asked, namely whether there is an "outsider" that (iii) proposes, advises and influences the decisions which the constitutional organs take in fulfilling their functions, or (iv) dictates the decisions which are to be taken. If either (ii) or (iv) occurs, POEM or CMC will generally reside where the usurper or outsider makes its decisions.

In Smallwood, the POEM test inevitably led to the question of whether the effective decision by the Mauritius trustees to sell the shares was taken by the Board of Directors of the trustee (albeit on the advice of, and at the request of, the U.K. advisors), or whether the Mauritius trustee effectively ceded any discretion in the matter to the U.K. advisors by agreeing to act in accordance with their instructions. With "suitable hesitation" the majority of the Court agreed that the POEM of the Mauritius trustee and of the trust was in the U.K. There was a scheme of management of this trust which went above and beyond the day-to-day management exercised by the trustee for the time being, and the control of it was located in the United Kingdom.

The battle in Smallwood has been close. HMRC won before the Special Commissioners, lost on appeal to the High Court, and won by a 2-to-1 margin in the Court of Appeal with two goals "for" in the 89th minute of play. The only true basis for distinguishing the case from Wood might appear to be a change in judicial tolerance for schemes that have no purpose other than tax avoidance.

Earlier jurisprudence in this area

The facts in Wood were strikingly similar. A scheme was devised and implemented by tax advisors to avoid U.K. tax. As part of this scheme, a special purpose Dutch corporation had a limited role of signing documents to authorize an agreement that appeared to have been reached in the U.K. The primary issue was whether the POEM of the Dutch company was in the Netherlands or the U.K. The Special Commissioners were not satisfied that CMC was not in London, concluding that:

...the only acts of management and control of the Dutch company were the making of the board resolutions and the signing and execution of documents in accordance with those resolutions. We do not consider that the mere physical acts of signing resolutions or documents suffice for actual management. Nor does the mental process which precedes the physical act. What is needed is an effective decision as to whether or not the resolution should be passed and the document signed or executed. Such decisions require some minimal level of information. The decisions must to some extent be informed decisions. Merely going through the motions of passing or making resolutions and signing documents does not suffice. Where the geographical location of the physical acts of signing and executing documents is different from the place where the actual effective decision that the documents be signed and executed is taken, we consider that the latter place is where CMC actually abides.

However, the High Court, with the subsequent approval of the Court of Appeal, overturned the decision of the Special Commissioners on the basis that the holding company did what it needed to do in its jurisdiction of purported residence and there was nothing improper about the U.K. parent ensuring that the board of the Dutch company knew what its parent desired its decisions to be. The fact that special purpose vehicles have little to do does not mean that they are agents or nominees, provided they do the little that is required of them in a proper fashion.

In Laerstate v. HMRC, [2009] UKFTT 209 (TC), the issue also was whether the POEM of a taxpayer was in the Netherlands or in the U.K. The Tribunal stated that the "whole picture must be considered in each case" and the director in the Netherlands did not possess the minimum information necessary for anyone to be able to decide whether to follow the instructions of the guiding hand. Those decisions were taken in the U.K. and the CMC and the POEM of the taxpayer was therefore in the U.K.

Canadian implications

For a Canadian judge who wishes to do so, Smallwood can easily be distinguished on either the facts or the specific U.K. legislation dealing with trusts. However, it might signal, together with Laerstate, a growing lack of judicial tolerance for schemes that appear to be designed for no purpose other than to avoid tax.

In Garron Family Trust v. The Queen, 2009 TCC 450, Madam Justice Woods found that the residence of a trust depended on where its CMC was located. It should be noted that Smallwood decided where the POEM or CMC of a trust was located, but did not address the particular issue of whether POEM had to be taken into account in determining where a trust was resident for the purposes of domestic law. The taxpayer's appeal in Garron is scheduled to be heard by the Federal Court of Appeal on September 30, 2010.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.