Canada: Back to Business: The Bilski Saga May be Over, the Patentability of Business Methods in the US is Not

Last Updated: July 12 2010
Article by Isabelle Chabot and Alexandre Abecassis

In a long awaited decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has decided on June 28, 2010, to reject the business method claims of US Patent Application N008/833,892 (hereinafter '892) that were pending since 1997 before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) because they pertain to abstract ideas (Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. __ (2010)). Since the US Supreme Court very rarely decides on cases relating to software and business methods, this decision is of the utmost importance. Indeed, this decision will influence how Examiners at the USPTO examine patent applications and also how patents are litigated in that jurisdiction. While strictly a U.S. decision, this case will be of great interest for Canadian companies in software, financial and high technology industries seeking patent protections for " processes " in the U.S.

The relevant claims of the '892 application define a business method in which a consumer pays a fixed fee for energy regardless of actual consumption, in peak months such as in winter in cold climate areas and in summer in hot climate areas. The consumer therefore avoids the risk of a high energy bill if the weather is particularly inclement. In order to determine the fixed fee, predictions are made based on historical data. The consumer would pay slightly more than the average predicted cost for the period of time. The supplier would receive slightly less than the average predicted cost allowing the middle-man to make a profit on each sale. The consumer would benefit from fixed-price billing for the duration of the period, thereby allowing proper budgeting and energy bills void of any surprises. The energy company would benefit from a guaranteed sale of its energy for the period and would appreciate the constant client base. The middle-man would make a profit based on the difference between the supplier rate and the consumer rate and could improve this profit by making better predictions and maximizing the difference between the average predicted cost and the consumer and supplier prices.

The claimed method may be implemented without a computer. It is therefore considered as a " pure " business method, namely a method of engaging in business transactions without necessarily requiring use of a computer. When a computer is used for carrying out at least one of the steps of a method for conducting business, the claim for protecting such a method is typically referred to as a " software claim " or a " computer-implemented method claim ".

It is interesting to note that the Supreme Court has not rejected the claims because they were directed to a business method but because they were directed to abstract ideas. In fact, the Supreme Court made a point of mentioning that the term " method ", which is within the definition of " process " may include at least some " claimed inventions designed for the business world ". It is noted that Section 101 recites broad patent eligibility and has a wide scope and that there are three exclusions. These exclusions are abstract ideas, laws of nature and physical phenomena. An algorithm itself is therefore not patentable. Limiting the algorithm to a specified industry does not help with patentability. However, an application of a law of nature or mathematical formula to a known structure or process can be deserving of patent protection if it is new and non-obvious. This decision is based on past decisions in Benson (Gottschalk v. Benson, 409 U.S. 63 (1972)), Diehr (Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (1981)) and Flook (Parker v. Flook, 437 U.S. 584 (1978)).

Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has not provided a satisfying account of what constitutes an unpatentable abstract idea. The Supreme Court has mentioned that the Applicant wanted to patent the concept of hedging risk and the application of that concept to energy markets.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (F.C.C.A.) (see In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. Cir. 2008) had stated that the " machine or transformation " test was the only test to apply when deciding whether a method claim was patentable. In short, this test involves determining if the invention is tied to a machine or if it transforms an article into another state or thing.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the " machine or transformation " test is not the sole test for patent eligibility. It is simply a " useful and important clue, an investigative tool for deciding whether a process invention satisfied Section 101 ". The " machine or transformation " test could create uncertainty as to the patentability of software, advanced diagnostic medicine techniques and the manipulation of digital signals. It was very useful during the Industrial Age but could be too restrictive in the Information Age. The Supreme Court has not, unfortunately, provided a new test that would allow to evaluate patentability of new or unforeseen technologies. Eliminating any single test for subject matter eligibility adds a level of complexity and ambiguity to the analysis of validity of patents.

The test used by the Federal Circuit in State Street Bank (State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc., 149 F.3d 1368 (1998)), namely the " useful, concrete, and tangible result " test, which opened the doors to patentability of business methods, has never been endorsed by the Supreme Court as a test for business method claims even though it was widely used in recent years prior to Bilski by the Federal Circuit.

The Supreme Court noted that patent eligibility under Section 101 is only a threshold inquiry and that a claimed invention must also satisfy the Patent Act's requirements that are, in particular, to be novel, non-obvious and fully and particularly described.

This decision will potentially affect all pending patent applications in the US and all granted US patents.

According to a memo sent to all Examiners at the USPTO and published on June 28, 2010 in reaction to the Supreme Court decision, Examiners will continue to use the machine or transformation test. If they believe the claims fail that test, they will continue to issue a subject-matter rejection. They will then expect the Applicant to explain why the claimed method is not drawn to an abstract idea. Further guidance may be provided to the Examiners by USPTO officials in the next weeks.

Following this Supreme Court decision, the Federal Circuit will try the Mayo Collaborative Services, et al. v. Prometheus Laboratories, (case No.09-490) and Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. Biogen IDEC, (case No. 08-1509) cases again. Biotechnology and pharmaceutical cases, especially those including diagnostic and method of treatment claims, have been affected by the earlier decision in Bilski. Some had been able to demonstrate that their claims pass the " machine or transformation " test. On another note, the Supreme Court denied to hear the Ferguson v. Patent and Trademark Office, (case No.09-490) case in which a " marketing paradigm " is claimed in a rejected patent application.

In conclusion, if a method claim passes the " machine or transformation ", it may most likely be patentable. If it does not pass that test, it may need to be drafted very carefully to ensure it is not an abstract idea. This Supreme Court decision may still facilitate the granting of pure business method patents.

So, what happens now?

Inventors in industries not traditionally concerned with patents, such as banking, insurance, gaming, gambling, etc. should consider patenting their business and software related inventions in the US.

It is possible to obtain patent protection for business methods and software applications in the US, as long as the claims are clear and do not simply define " laws of nature, physical phenomenon and abstract ideas ". Inventors should therefore consider filing patent applications for protecting such methods.

Various mechanisms exist to review the contents of pending applications and granted patents in the United States. The following are examples of strategies that could be used by patent applicants.

Pending US patent applications should also be reviewed to determine whether additional or modified claims should be added to those applications via an amendment. For example, an analysis of the relevance of narrow language added to tie the method steps to a machine or to demonstrate transformation of an article should be carried out. Continuation as well as continuation-in-part patent applications may also be filed in the United States to add claims related to an originally-filed application still pending. If software or a business method was described in the patent application but was not claimed, new claims for that aspect may be added.

Furthermore, it may still be possible to apply for a reissue of a granted patent in order to adjust the scope of protection originally claimed.

In the case of pending patent litigations or disputes, the impact of the decision will be immediate. Parties will have to reevaluate their position on validity and as to whether or not the claims are directed to abstract ideas.

In the case where the market for an invention includes territories outside of the United States, care should be taken when deciding what to protect and how to protect it since it is likely that broader patent protection may be available in the United States versus Europe and Canada, for example. Consideration for other forms of protection, such as trade secrets and design applications may be useful.

In short, although the business method claims of Bilski were held to be non patentable in the United States, other business methods could be patentable if they define a new, non-obvious, useful, fully described and non-abstract method.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.