ARTICLE
18 January 2023

Another Round Of Submissions On Draft Excessive Interest And Financing Expenses Limitation Legislation

sL
Lawson Lundell LLP

Contributor

Lawson Lundell is a leading full-service law firm, known for our strategic approach to legal services. With over 160 lawyers, and offices in Vancouver, Calgary, Yellowknife and Kelowna, we are widely recognized for our depth of experience and innovative solutions to complex business law and litigation matters across various sectors.
Revisions to earlier draft legislation on the Excessive Interest and Finance Expenses Limitation (EIFEL) regime were released by the Department of Finance on November...
Canada Tax
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Revisions to earlier draft legislation on the Excessive Interest and Finance Expenses Limitation (EIFEL) regime were released by the Department of Finance on November 3, 2022. Lawson Lundell submitted comments on the government's first round of consultations, raising concerns about the overly broad scope of the rules. A copy of our earlier submission can be found at the end of our April 29, 2022 blog.

The government's latest revisions address various issues identified by taxpayers with respect to the initial draft of the rules, including relaxing the rules to exclude arm's length financing (albeit based on a high threshold test that requires "all or substantially all" debt to be from arm's length lenders). There remain, however, technical and policy concerns regarding the rules. Lawson Lundell submitted comments again on January 6, 2023 as part of the Federal Government's second round of consultations.

Our submission focused on the "excluded entity" concept under the rules that generally exempts a taxpayer from the EIFEL rules. Not surprisingly, the excluded entity definition contains multiple tests that have to be satisfied before a taxpayer may qualify for exemption from the EIFEL rules but, as noted in our submission, the excluded entity concept still looks to capture interest payments made to lenders that are considered "tax-indifferent investors." This term includes:

  • non-resident persons;
  • Canadian resident tax-exempt entity (which we noted again in the submission should be excluded from what are designed to be international base erosion rules); and
  • any trust or partnership, more than 10% of the interests in which are held by non-residents or Canadian resident tax-exempts.

On the last category of tax-indifferent investors, not only is the 10% test a troublingly low bar but the presence of partnerships (which are not separate legal entities) in the analysis can create considerable uncertainty for taxpayers in determining whether the taxpayer qualifies as an excluded entity.

For a copy of our submission, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More