When the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Hryniak v. Mauldin on Jan. 23 of last year, counsel immediately began to mourn what was perceived as the inevitable death of the trial. One year later, it is helpful to explore how Hryniak has altered the medical malpractice landscape, and the patterns that have emerged.
To view the full article please click here.
Previously published in The Lawyers Weekly
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.