ARTICLE
23 April 2019

Clarity For Crabby Joe's?: The Supreme Court Of Canada Denies Leave To Appeal In Franchise Dispute

C
Cassels
Contributor
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP is a leading Canadian law firm focused on serving the advocacy, transaction and advisory needs of the country’s most dynamic business sectors. Learn more at casselsbrock.com.
In our previous newsletters, we reported on the case of 2212886 Ontario v. Obsidian Group, which arose out of a motion for partial summary judgment concerning a franchise dispute.
Canada Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In our previous newsletters, we reported on the case of 2212886 Ontario v. Obsidian Group, which arose out of a motion for partial summary judgment concerning a franchise dispute. By way of brief summary, at the Superior Court of Justice level, there were two principal issues respecting liability. The first was whether the disclosure document provided by the franchisor was so materially deficient as to constitute no disclosure at all, giving rise to a right to rescission within two years of the execution of the franchise agreement pursuant to the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000, S.O. 2000, c. 3. The second liability issue was whether the two year period ran from the date the parties first executed the franchise agreement, in which case the claim would be out of time, or from the date the parties executed a replacement agreement, in which case the claim was timely. The motion judge granted the franchisee and its principals rescission of the franchise agreement and damages against the franchisor and its director. ( A copy of our discussion on the Superior Court of Justice decision can be found here.)

On appeal, the Appellate Court allowed the appeal in part, setting aside all but the motion judge's determination of the limitation period issue. This decision was made on the basis that there was an insufficient record upon which to make crucial findings of fact and that oral evidence was necessary to address issues of credibility.( A copy of our discussion on the Court of Appeal decision can be found here.)

On March 7, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada released its judgment dismissing the franchisee's application for leave to appeal with costs. Following the failed appeal, the matter will be sent back to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice for trial. ( A copy of the Supreme Court of Canada's decision refusing leave to appeal can be found here.)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
23 April 2019

Clarity For Crabby Joe's?: The Supreme Court Of Canada Denies Leave To Appeal In Franchise Dispute

Canada Corporate/Commercial Law
Contributor
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP is a leading Canadian law firm focused on serving the advocacy, transaction and advisory needs of the country’s most dynamic business sectors. Learn more at casselsbrock.com.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More