Brazil: Anti-Corruption Policies: Practical Aspects Of Its Implementation In Latin America

Last Updated: 10 February 2015
Article by José Carlos Wahle
Most Read Contributor in Brazil, October 2018

Due to the extraterritorial application of anti-corruption legislation now in force in many countries, multinational companies need to implement policies in all of the jurisdictions that they operate to minimise the risk of non-compliance. Due to unique labour laws in many Latin American countries, implementation needs to be tailored specifically to each jurisdiction. This article analyses the effects of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) on multinational companies operating in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Peru, with specific focus on its practical consequences from a labour perspective.

Availability of FCPAs affirmative defences in Latin America and key aspects to take into account in lobbying and promotional activities

In short, the FCPA makes it unlawful, either directly or through its representatives, agents or employees, to corruptly make an offer, payment promise or actual payment in favour of a foreign official, foreign political party, foreign political party officer or candidate. It is not just direct payments or offers to corruptly pay public officials companies need to be mindful of. They also need to ensure that promotional or lobbying payments are not a front for such payments.

Companies need to be particularly careful with lobbying and paying promotional expenses to government officials in the states considered. In Argentina, for instance, the payment of promotional expenses for government officials, as well as travel and entertainment, is prohibited. Moreover, donations to politicians or political parties must be done by Argentine residents. Foreign companies could only therefore make political contributions through local subsidiaries. An action is corrupt if it is done with the intent of inducing the recipient to misuse their official position to direct business wrongfully to the payer or any other person. A person charged with a violation of the FCPA's anti-bribery provisions may assert as a defence that the action was lawful under the written laws of the foreign country or that it was a reasonable and bona fide expenditure, such as travel and lodging expenses, as part of demonstrating a product or performing a contractual obligation with a foreign government or agency.

The second affirmative defence, concerning bona fide expenditure, would be applied objectively and there should not be differences between jurisdictions. However, the legality of prohibited conduct in each jurisdiction varies. This is perhaps the key point for multinationals with operations in Latin America.

For all intents and purposes, all of the prohibited conducts set out in the FCPA, as it would be applied in the respective local jurisdictions, are crimes under Argentine, Colombian and Peruvian law. Accordingly, the first affirmative defence could not apply in relation to actions occurring in those jurisdictions.

A slight distinction needs to be drawn with Chile. Although the prohibited offences are all crimes, the company's responsibility for the acts of an employee may be diminished or eliminated if it has in place a corruption prevention policy and this policy was not adhered to by the employee.

The situation in Brazil is more complicated. Anti-corruption legislation is directed towards public servants and not the private corrupt agent. Although there is criminal liability for the agent, this cannot be attributed to the person or company that asked the agent to perform the corrupt act.

Implementing an effective anti-corruption policy: domestic legal matters to be aware of

Overwhelmingly, it is apparent that affirmative defences based on local laws will not be possible in the Latin American jurisdictions considered. Accordingly, it is imperative that companies put in place systems to prevent corruption from occurring. As aforementioned, in the case of Chile, having such a system in place could provide a company with a defence under local law in the event that the employee disregards this system and it could, therefore, provide it with an affirmative defence. Even in those jurisdictions where such an affirmative defence is not available, establishing corruption prevention systems is essential to reduce the chances of being liable under the FCPA.

In each of the five jurisdictions considered, it is permissible to implement a labour-control and transparency policy to reduce instances of prohibited acts. The requirements for such policies have the following common features in each jurisdiction:

  • they must not be in violation of local law, particularly labour law;
  • the policy should be proportionate to its purpose; and
  • it should be in writing.

Additionally, and although this is not a strict requirement in some jurisdictions, it is advisable to have the employee sign a copy of the policy at the commencement of employment. If the policy is issued after the commencement of employment, employers should have the policy signed by all employees.

In some jurisdictions, there are limits on the ambit of labour-control policies. For instance, in Argentina if the policy determines an employer's control over employees' conduct, we recommend that it is filed with the Ministry of Labour as evidence of absence of violation of employees' dignity and privacy rights.

In Chile, policies must have temporal and territorial limits. This means that policies can only be applied to employees when they are working and/or in the workspace. In Peru, all companies that have more than 100 employees are required to prepare a document entitled 'Internal Work Regulations' and submit it to the Ministry of Labour for approval. For multinational companies operating in Peru, one option would be to incorporate the anticorruption policy into this document. For smaller companies it could be done through a specific policy.

How to secure the legal tools for investigating acts of corruption

A key way to minimise corruption risks is to monitor employees. The most obvious and, perhaps, the easiest way to do this is through email. However, in many jurisdictions, the ability of employers to monitor emails is limited. A common point in each jurisdiction is that due to the employee's right to privacy, employers are not able to monitor personal email accounts. Notwithstanding that employees may use company computers, networks and servers, employers are not able to monitor employees using their personal email accounts. Employers can, however, create firewalls preventing employees from accessing certain websites or types of websites, which may include personal email accounts.

The situation with company email accounts is different. In short, it is possible, in some form, to monitor employees' company email accounts in each jurisdiction considered.

However, the right to monitor and the scope of the monitoring is different in each jurisdiction and can be summarised as follows:


Subject to the prior written authorisation of the employee, the employer may monitor work emails. However, the confidentiality of personal emails, even when sent and received through work email addresses, must be maintained. It is advisable to have this policy of control filed with the Ministry of Labour to get its authorisation as evidence of lack of violation of employees' privacy rights.


Provided that the monitoring policy is communicated to employees and enforced consistently, employers may monitor work emails. Private emails sent through work accounts may be blocked, but they cannot be monitored.


Employers have the right to regulate the conditions, frequency and opportunity to use email at work, but under no circumstances does this entitle them to violate an employee's right to private communication. Employers are not, therefore, entitled to view emails unless they could be considered non-private communication. This may represent a conflict with the interest of the employer to protect its information, which Chilean courts have not addressed. Interestingly, in order to overcome this conflict, employers have explored using investigation protocols and tools aimed at safeguarding the employee's privacy, such as searching emails by keywords or appointing external investigative teams bounded by nondisclosure provisions. Nevertheless, these have not been sanctioned by labour authorities.


Company email accounts are considered to be work tools and the company's right to view emails generally supersedes the employee's right to privacy. This right to monitor emails is not absolute. Advanced notice must be given of the monitoring and private emails must be kept confidential.


No Peruvian law specifically covers the right of an employer to access and monitor employees' emails. However, the constitution recognises the fundamental right to privacy. Accordingly, and in practice, emails can only be viewed or intercepted with the proper warrant from a judge. Any private communication that is viewed through this process must be kept confidential.

In those jurisdictions where emails can be monitored without judicial authorisation, it is advisable that written consent be obtained from the employee at the commencement of the employment relationship or at some point of the labour relationship if the control policy is issued after commencement of employment. In addition, when emails are being monitored, employers should avoid reading personal emails and, at a minimum, keep those emails confidential if viewing them is unavoidable as part of wider monitoring.

Employers should also be aware that in some jurisdictions there are restrictions on maintaining databases connected to employees. In all cases, personal information about employees must be kept strictly confidential. In Argentina, all databases must be registered with the Ministry of Justice. Employees' consent is required to keep databases and they cannot contain sensitive information about employees, such as race, religion, political affiliations, sexual preferences and union affiliation. Importantly, information on databases cannot be sent to or stored in countries outside of Argentina that do not have the same standards of data protection. Peruvian law is materially identical to Argentine law on this point, except for the requirement to register databases with a government authority. Restrictions on maintaining databases with sensitive information also exist in Chile and Colombia. Furthermore, in Colombia, employees have the right to view and update any information stored about them on a database.

Blowing the whistle: employees' rights and duties with respect to corrupt actions of bosses and colleagues

Except in relation to certain professions, such as lawyers or accountants, and only in certain cases, employees are not obliged to report the corruption of superiors and colleagues to the company or public authorities in the majority of jurisdictions considered. However, in Colombia citizens have a constitutional obligation to cooperate in the administration of justice. This requires them to report corrupt actions to the police. If an employee with knowledge of a corrupt act failed to do so, he or she could be subjected to criminal action or sanction by the employer.

Given that there is generally no positive obligation on employees to report corruption, a commonly mooted way to increase reporting is through the establishment of a whistleblower system. Establishing such a system is possible in all of the five countries considered, however, the implementation requirements vary. In Peru, employers are entitled to set up any procedure in the workplace that they deem appropriate for any purpose; accordingly, they can establish a whistleblower system through internal regulations or other instruments. In all other jurisdictions, a whistleblower system can be set up, provided that the system does not conflict with employee dignity and does not lead to harassment.

For legal and practical reasons, a whistleblower system set up using the following parameters would meet the minimum common requirements of each jurisdiction:

  • an anonymous reporting system;
  • the system must be notified to employees in writing;
  • if the identity of the whistleblower is volunteered, that person should not be subjected to harassment, reprisal or discrimination from either the company or the person about whom the report was made;
  • the whistleblower's report should be substantiated by evidence before any disciplinary action is taken against the allegedly corrupt employee; and
  • notwithstanding the anonymous report, the company must comply with all privacy and other legal obligations when conducting any investigation into the allegedly corrupt employee.

What companies can do upon uncovering a corrupt act and what they must do

Only in Colombia is a company obliged to report a corrupt act to public authorities. This arises from the constitutional mandate to cooperate in the administration of justice. In all other jurisdictions there is no specific requirement to report corrupt acts to public authorities. In Chile, although companies are not required to report employees' corrupt acts to the authorities, if a company does so before it is aware that it is being investigated for the corrupt act, it can plead diminished responsibility. This would not be sufficient to raise an affirmative defence under the FCPA because the company would still be liable; it would just not be subject to the same sanctions that would otherwise apply.

The disciplinary actions that a company can take against an employee vary in each jurisdiction. Under Peruvian law, an employer can dismiss an employee if that person is found guilty of committing of an offence covered by the FCPA. An employer may not need to wait until the employee is found guilty of the offence if it can be proven that the action was in violation of his/her good faith obligation to the employer or contrary to the internal work regulations of the company. Brazil and Colombia are quite similar to Peru; however, employers in those jurisdictions are able to dismiss employees for criminal acts committed by the employee in the workplace or in the performance of work duties, without waiting for criminal sanction.

Argentina and Chile provide the greatest protection for employees in the event that they have committed a corrupt act, and employers should be extremely cautious before dismissing employees on this basis. Both jurisdictions provide for progressive disciplinary measures starting at a verbal warning through to straight dismissal. If the action of the employee is sufficiently serious, an employer may immediately dismiss the employee. In any event, disciplinary measures must be based on specific actions set out in the labour laws of the respective countries. In neither jurisdiction does this include committing a criminal offence, although the same action that gives rise to criminal liability may be punishable under labour law. In Argentina disciplinary measures must be based on serious misconduct from the employee that is a breach of his/her duties as an employee. The main employees' duties to the employer are: (i) good faith; (ii) cooperation; (iii) no competition; (iv) confidentiality; (v) obedience; and (vi) safeguarding work tools.

A difficult situation may arise if an employee is carrying out the instructions of a supervisor. As mentioned, in Argentina, for instance, there is a duty of obedience to the employer. However, this duty is not absolute and an employee can validly refuse to obey instructions if to do so it would perform a corrupt act. This position is the same across the jurisdictions considered. That a superior instructed them to do it is not a defence to breaching obligations to an employer. Brazil provides a measure of protection for the employee in that it must have been apparent to an ordinary man that what was being requested was illegal. Further, Brazilian courts have also found that it is not reasonable, in some instances, for employees to refuse to obey instructions if the consequence may be that they would lose their jobs.

Supervisors also bear an amount of responsibility for the actions of their employees in each jurisdiction. In each jurisdiction, if the corrupt act of the employee is subject to disciplinary action, it is strongly recommended that the supervisor be disciplined appropriately as well. The situation is not as clear when the employee has acted without instructions. Supervisors have an obligation to oversee the work of their employees. In Colombia, for instance, the supervisor will not be held accountable if he or she proves that the subordinate behaved improperly, in such a form that the supervisor had no means to prevent or stop his or her actions.

The Colombian position encapsulates the state of the law in all jurisdictions considered.


The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions