Brazil: International Lis Pendens: New Perspectives For The Brazilian Approach

This brief article is intended to address the issue of international lis pendens from a Brazilian law perspective and its recent developments.

The Brazilian Civil Procedure Code (BCPC) provides that `the lawsuit brought before a foreign court does not imply lis pendens and does not prevent the Brazilian Judiciary Authority from processing the same lawsuit and [about the] ones related to it'.1 Brazilian law abides by a general principle of not recognising international lis pendens even if the lawsuits filed before the Brazilian and foreign courts are absolutely identical. Such provision of the BCPC must be interpreted in the context of the jurisdiction granted to Brazilian courts. Sections 89 and 88 of the BCPC determine the cases in which Brazilian courts have jurisdiction to process and to decide lawsuits either in an exclusive way or not.

Section 89 provides that Brazilian courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction to process disputes over real estate located in Brazil and to preside over probate proceeding of assets situated in Brazil, even if the deceased is a foreign individual or had his or her domicile abroad.

Brazilian courts have non-exclusive jurisdiction in the following cases, listed in section 88 of the BCPC: (i) disputes in which the defendant, regardless of his or her nationality, is domiciled in Brazil - including multinational companies that have subsidiaries and/or branches in Brazil; (ii) disputes addressing matters related to obligations to be performed in Brazil; and (iii) disputes arising from facts or events that took place in Brazil.

Evidently, the fact that Brazilian law provides for exclusive jurisdiction of its national courts to decide on disputes regarding the matters listed in section 89, as mentioned above, does not mean that the dispute brought to a foreign court dealing with one of such matters must be dismissed. This would constitute a clear violation of the sovereignty of the country before which the dispute was brought. Theoretically, the consequence would be that Brazilian courts would not ratify nor enforce a foreign decision made by said court. This is based on the fact that procedural law is a matter of public policy according to Brazilian legal tradition. Thus, the decision would not be granted exequatur or leave of enforcement by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice, which is the judiciary body empowered to validate foreign judgments in Brazil.

On the other hand, the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice will, as a rule, grant exequatur or leave of enforcement to a foreign decision arising from a dispute dealing with matters that fall into the list of issues over which the BCPC grants Brazilian courts non-exclusive jurisdiction.

In this context, absent a general rule to prevent international lis pendens in Brazilian law, a dispute filed before Brazilian courts would not prevent the enforcement of a foreign judgment resulting from an identical dispute. In fact, if this is the case, the ongoing dispute filed before a Brazilian court should be immediately dismissed, since, once ratified in Brazil, the final decision on the matter entails res judicata in Brazil.

There are precedents in Brazilian case law of validation and enforcement of foreign judgments even if there is an ongoing lawsuit brought before a Brazilian court, between the same parties, dealing with the same facts and in which the same relief is sought, provided the dispute does not fall into the situations in which Brazilian law provides for exclusive jurisdiction of the Brazilian courts.2

By virtue of the wording of section 90 of the BCPC, the simple fact that identical disputes exist and develop before two different jurisdictions, one of them being Brazil, does not authorise the dismissal of the dispute developing before the Brazilian court.

It should be emphasised that, as a general rule, Brazilian law does not encompass the principle of prohibition of forum-shopping and forum non conveniens. It means that a Brazilian court will not refuse to process a certain dispute even if the parties have been already litigating abroad and jurisdiction has not been challenged by the party that brings the new dispute before a Brazilian court. Naturally, this system is unable to prevent undesirable situations, especially when one of the parties intends to engage in forumshopping practices in any way possible.

Nonetheless, despite the strict application of procedural law in the field of international lis pendens, Brazilian courts have shown they are aware of the problems arising out of the existence of simultaneous disputes brought by the same party before two (or more) different jurisdictions.

The Brazilian Superior Court of Justice has decided that a party that files identical lawsuits before different jurisdictions would violate the general duty of good faith and would, hence, be making undue use of its rights. That being the case, such party could suffer negative consequences arising therefrom, regardless of the lack of regulation on international lis pendens in Brazil.

The precedent arises from a Provisional Remedy fled before the mentioned Superior Court. The parties discussed the issue of jurisdiction due to the fact that different disputes were simultaneously taking place in Brazil and in the United Kingdom (Provisional Remedy 15 3 98/R J, decision on 23 April 2009).

Although the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice did not analyse the specifc issue of international lis pendens or even the legitimacy of the behaviour of the plaintiff - that filed identical lawsuits before Brazilian and British courts - the rationale of the decision indicates a trend to consider forum-shopping to be a violation of the general duty of good faith and an abusive use of one's rights.

In this context, pursuant to Brazil's Civil Code, both violation of the duty of good faith and the abusive use of one's rights are considered to be unlawful acts and would entitle the party that suffers any damage in connection with such behaviour to seek compensation.

Even though the decision did not go as far as preventing the Brazilian dispute to carry on, which would be the ultimate remedy to prevent forum-shopping, said decision appears to be an initial reaction by Brazilian courts to the lack of a vigorous response to bad faith or frivolous litigation behaviour. This is expected to be a long-awaited wind of change in terms of international lis pendens in Brazilian law.

While there is no legislative change to address this issue, an alternative solution might be found in Brazilian law, to avoid forum-shopping. This solution concerns the use of the fact that, according to the BCPC, a dispute may only be brought to a Brazilian court if there is a justifiable controversy. This rule entails that, in case the relief sought is considered not to be necessary for the plaintiff to achieve its ultimate purpose, the dispute should be dismissed without prejudice. The BCPC establishes that the justifiable controversy comprises the necessity and usefulness of the dispute.

Introducing such rule into the field of international lis pendens and forumshopping, it is possible to infer that a party that asked for a certain relief before a foreign court does not need to litigate in Brazil in order to obtain such a relief. After all, it has recourse to the foreign court. Therefore, the case could be dismissed due to the lack of justifiable controversy, even if the foreign court denies the relief sought.

Summing up, although Brazilian law does not recognise international lis pendens, there has been a relevant evolution on the matter, especially when it comes to preventing forumshopping. It is now time to expect this to be just the beginning of a growing trend that leads to a more contemporary approach to the problem of international lis pendens in Brazilian legislation.


1 BCPC, section 90.

2 Foreign Judgment Challenged N o 3 6 6 8/U S, decision on 15 December 2010, Foreign Judgment Challenged No 26 11/PL , decision on 15 December 2010 and Foreign Judgment Challenged N o 911/G B, decision on 16 May 2007 , Special Appeal No 25 14 3 8/R J, decision on 8 August 2000.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions