Brazil: Highlights Of Arbitration Developments In Brazil

This article was previously published in the International Bar Association Legal Practice Division - March 2011.

The old and the new: a clear change in Culture

Brazil is a country in constant economic and social development, steadily participating in more and more international trade. As a result, arbitration has become an important tool with which to provide greater certainty and comfort about dispute resolution matters, particularly to foreign investors.

The Brazilian Arbitration Act1 (BAA) came into force 15 years ago. It was not until 2004, however, after challenges to its constitutionality were resolved by the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court (declaring the law constitutional), that Brazil saw the use of arbitration significantly increase.2

Over the past few years there has been marked change with respect to arbitration in Brazil's legal practice. Until recently, it was only the larger and foreign/multinational companies which chose ADR on a regular basis. Now, local Brazilian companies and smaller companies routinely choose arbitation or other ADR methods to resolve commercial disputes.

Arbitration and the judiciary: recent rulings are encouraging

The increasing use of arbitration in Brazil is evident in several recent decisions issued by the judiciary – decisions which address the central tenets of arbitration.

Application of the kompetenz-kompetenz principle.

The BAA states that the kompetenzkompetenz principle is to be followed in Brazil. Nevertheless, it remains at the centre of disputes and court decisions.

The Superior Court of Justice recently issued a decision which reinvigorated the debate about kompetenz-kompetenz and divided practitioners throughout the country.3 The Superior Court's decision concerned a circuit court's decision to grant an injunction against arbitration proceedings that had been requested by a party, even though the arbitral tribunal had already been formed. In response, the arbitral tribunal reaffirmed its jurisdiction and ordered that the injunction be revoked. One of the parties filed a petition to the Superior Court of Justice, and Justice Aldir Passarinho Júnior accepted the matter for review – stating that the Brazilian Federal Constitution provided the Superior Court of Justice with jurisdiction to adjudicate conflicts between courts and tribunals of any type whatsoever.

The merits of the underlying dispute have yet to be resolved as of the date of this article, but the Superior Court's decision to accept the case for review is noteworthy as the Court will have to address the arbitral tribunal's assertion that it had jurisdiction, and hence application of the kompetenz-kompetenz principle will be at the centre of any ruling.

Arbitration agreement executed prior to the enactment of the BAA

Recently, the Superior Court of Justice ruled that an arbitration clause is valid and binding, even where it is included in agreements that were executed prior to the enactment of the 1996 BAA.4 The Court reasoned that because arbitration is a procedural tool, its application is mandatory under Brazilian law, even if entered into prior to the BAA.

Government participation in arbitration

Agreements which include Brazilian Government entities as parties increasingly contain dispute resolution clauses that provide for mediation and/or arbitration. This is a significant development, as in years past Brazilian law – supported by judicial decisions and pronouncements by legal scholars – unequivocally provided that rights of the government were non-disputable and could not, therefore, be subject to arbitration. Recent legislation has provided for the shift in situations where the disputes are propertyrelated and therefore deemed 'disposable'.5

For example, in 2005 the law governing the concession of public services was amended to allow for the use of ADR (including arbitration) to resolve disputes concerning the agreements, provided that the ADR proceedings are held in Brazil, conducted in Portuguese, and governed by the BAA.6 Similarly, the law governing Public-Private Partnerships now expressly authorises the inclusion of arbitration clauses in partnership agreements, provided again that the seat of the arbitration is in Brazil, the language of the arbitration is Portuguese, and the arbitration is conducted pursuant to the BAA.7

The federal laws addressing heavily regulated industries have followed suit. The law setting forth the Brazilian policy on energy, which created the Brazilian National Agency of Petroleum (ANP), now permits ADR clauses, including those that provide for international arbitration, to be included in concession agreements.8 It also provides that the ANP itself may act as an arbitrator in conflicts between concessionaires.9 The legislation concerning energy free market trade goes even further and requires that arbitration clauses be included in the rules regarding resolution of conflicts between industry members.10 The law also authorises government-owned companies, governmentcontrolled companies, as well as their respective subsidiaries and affiliates, to accept arbitration clauses.11 The same is true for the Brazilian General Telecommunications Act.12

The acceptance of arbitration clauses in such agreements is well-timed, in view of the opportunities created by Brazil's increasing participation in international trade and of foreign investments in Brazil's economy. Notably, the need for investments in infrastructure, most evident by the enormous construction that will be undertaken in connection with the 2014 World Cup and the 2016 Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro, represents both an opportunity as well as the ultimate test for the inclusion of arbitration clauses in public agreements.

Judicial intervention during the evidentiary stage – the Metrô case

Companhia do Metropolitano de São Paulo – Metrô is a leading case regarding judicial intervention in state arbitration. In this case, while the parties were still engaged in the discovery phase of the proceeding, a Brazilian Court granted a writ of mandamus to order that an engineering expert be allowed to provide evidence in the arbitration, despite the fact that the arbitral tribunal had, in its discretion, determined that the expert's evidence was unnecessary and denied the party's request to introduce expert evidence. The court's ruling was temporarily stayed by the Appellate Court of the State of São Paulo – a decision that received significant praise from the arbitral community.13 Nevertheless, the lower court re-established the injunction based on new grounds, and the Court of Appeals has yet to rule on this new decision. It remains to be seen what the final outcome will be, but the matter is being watched closely by arbitration practitioners.


The use of arbitration, both domestic and international, has grown exponentially in Brazil and has reached industries in which the practice was not previously utilised – the clearest example being agreements entered into with government entities.

Additionally, the judiciary has shown tremendous respect for the central and important concept of arbitration as a private contractual matter. Much is still to be done, but the progress achieved is noteworthy and is a development about which the Brazilian arbitration community can be proud, and in which the international arbitration community can trust.


1 Law No 9307/96.

2 SEC 5206-7, judgment from 10 October 1996 to 12 December 2001, decision published on 30 April 2004.

3 Conflict of Jurisdiction (cc) n. III230/DF, decision published 10 July 2010.

4 Resp 934771/SP, Fourth Panel, judged on 25 May 2010, published by the DJ on 9 June 2010.

5 See, for example, MS 11308/DF, Reporting Justice Luiz Fux, First Panel, judged on 9 April 2008, published by the DJ on 19 May 2008.

6 Law No 8987/95, Article 23-A.

7 Law No 11079/2004, Article 11, subsection III and Article 43, subsection X.

8 Law No 9478/97.

9 Article 27.

10 Law No 10848/2004.

11 Article 4, paragraphs 5 to 7.

12 Law No 9472/97 (article 93, subsection XV).

13 Interlocutory Appeal No 990.10.284191-0, Reporting Judge Franco Cocuzza.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions