On September 29, 2015, the First Panel of the Brazilian Supreme Court ("STF") issued a ruling in Extraordinary Appeal No. 776.273/DF holding that penalties that exceed the amount of taxes owing are unconstitutional.
The decision denied the Regimental Appeal filed by the Federal District against the decision rendered by Supreme Court Justice Ricardo Lewandowski, which held that the constitutional prohibition against confiscatory taxation should also apply to tax fines.
It is important to highlight that the Supreme Court has used the amount of the tax owing—instead of the transaction's value—as the basis to determine the confiscatory nature of the fine charged, which is in contrast with how the Supreme Court has treated it in the past.
Taxpayers that have been penalized by tax fines that exceeded their taxes owed can now seek a court ruling recognizing the unconstitutionality of such charges.
Visit us at Tauil & Chequer
Founded in 2001, Tauil & Chequer Advogados is a full service law firm with approximately 90 lawyers and offices in Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and Vitória. T&C represents local and international businesses on their domestic and cross-border activities and offers clients the full range of legal services including: corporate and M&A; debt and equity capital markets; banking and finance; employment and benefits; environmental; intellectual property; litigation and dispute resolution; restructuring, bankruptcy and insolvency; tax; and real estate. The firm has a particularly strong and longstanding presence in the energy, oil and gas and infrastructure industries as well as with pension and investment funds. In December 2009, T&C entered into an agreement to operate in association with Mayer Brown LLP and become "Tauil & Chequer Advogados in association with Mayer Brown LLP."
© Copyright 2015. Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. All rights reserved.
This article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.