ARTICLE
24 March 2011

Supreme Court Rules In T-Mobile Dominance Case

SA
Schoenherr Attorneys at Law

Contributor

We are a full-service law firm with a footprint in Central and Eastern Europe providing local and international companies stellar advice. As the go-to legal advisor for complex commercial matters in the region, Schoenherr aims to use its proximity to industry leaders, in developing practical solutions for future challenges. We keep a close eye on trends and developments, which enables us to provide high quality legal advice that is straight to the point.
The end of 2010 saw the end of the litigation against the largest mobile operator in Macedonia, T-Mobile.
Austria Antitrust/Competition Law

The end of 2010 saw the end of the litigation against the largest mobile operator in Macedonia, T-Mobile. The Supreme Court upheld a decision by the Administrative Court finding that T-Mobile had abused its dominant position in the call termination market. As a result, the Commission for the Protection of Competition fined T-Mobile €785,426. The case arose because T-Mobile charged the caller from the moment when the voicemail box was 'opened' (ie, as soon as the voicemail notification message began), giving the caller no opportunity to choose whether he or she wanted to use the service (ie, by leaving a voicemail message). Moreover, the caller was not warned that he or she would be charged if he or she called a number that was unavailable.

In further news from the commission, in January 2011 it initiated proceedings against City Parking for abuse of a dominant position, on the grounds that City Parking charges unjustifiably high amounts for the reissuance of parking permits which have expired or been stolen.

Finally, two new sets of competition-related guidelines have recently been adopted:

  • the Guidelines on Determining the Fines to be Imposed under the Law on Protection of Competition; and
  • the Guidelines on Preparing a Non-confidential Version of Decisions of the Commission for the Protection of Competition.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More