Australia: Are the "Recommendations" of Family Report Writers Admissible Evidence?

Last Updated: 17 December 2009

The fundamental rule of evidence is that it must be relevant. It is said that all other rules of evidence flow from this fundamental rule.[1] The purpose of the fundamental rule is to only allow "evidence" which tends to prove or disprove a fact in issue.[2] Anything else is a hindrance, or even detrimental, to the deliberation process the Court is required to undertake.

One principal which flows from the fundamental rule is that "evidence" cannot be received which "swears to the ultimate issue." There is some doubt about the certainty of this principal as a rule of evidence,[3] however most recently Callinan J held in Naxakis v. Western General Hospital:[4]

"At this point I would observe that there is an increasing tendency for counsel to seek to elicit (and their opponents to acquiesce in this endeavour) evidence on the ultimate legal issue. In the absence of a statutory basis for the reception of such evidence, the better view I think is that a court should generally uphold an objection to it."

Section 69ZT of the Family Law Act 1975 states, relevantly, that the rules of evidence do not apply to "child-related proceedings." The section flows from principles for conducting child-related proceedings listed at section 69ZN of the Act. One of those principles is to ensure proceedings are conducted without undue delay and with as little formality and legal technicality and form as possible. The correlation is that prima facie the rules of evidence produce formality and legal technicality not conducive to these proceedings. Nevertheless, within section 69ZT, the Court is still empowered to apply the rules of evidence should the circumstances of the case require it sub-section 69ZT(3) refers. Whilst that sub-section lists matters the Court should consider in the application of the rules of evidence, it is clear that should a rule of evidence enhance the likelihood of an expeditious resolution, or remove technicality, then such a rule would, in my opinion, satisfy subsection 69ZT(3) and be likely to be applied. Couple that with a judge's inherent unwillingness to abandon all the rules learnt and applied with alacrity over several years, and it is not unreasonable to argue that the rules of evidence still play a part in child-related proceedings.

It is certainly not helpful to expeditious resolution, informality or the reduction of technicality that parties come to the court with voluminous affidavits replete with irrelevant material. Nor is there any room for what is irrelevant to the expeditious resolution of a child-related proceeding.

In Kernot v. Matson, Watt J considered the admissibility of a family report writer's recommendations.[5] In that case, the recommendations (amongst other parts of the report) where challenged because, as senior counsel submitted, the recommendations pre-determined an issue for the Court.[6] Watt J rejected this submission and held:[7]

"Even if Part 3 of the Evidence Act 1995 were to apply in this case, which at the moment it does not, it would be permissible for a report writer to express an opinion in respect of an ultimate issue (see section 80 of the Evidence Act). As I commented during submissions, recommendations are one piece of opinion evidence that is weighed with all the other evidence that the court takes into account. It will be for the court to judge the reliability of the evidence, including whether or not statements made by the children are true. It will be for the court to judge what arrangements are in the children's best interests."

What his Honour seems to be saying is that even if the Court applies the rules of evidence, ie the Evidence Act 1995, then section 80 renders the evidence admissible. Then, in any event, the recommendations are but one piece of evidence to be considered and it is the function of the Court to determine the ultimate issue.

In the Federal Court, Lindgren J in Allstate Life Insurance Co. and Ors v. ANZ Banking Group Ltd and Ors (No 33 ) had to decide the admissibility of evidence given by an American securities law expert as to the applicability of certain assumed facts to that law.[8] No challenge was given as to the admissibility of the expert to state what the applicable law was. The challenge was that the expert could not then give evidence as to how the Court might ultimately determine the matter. His Honour considered section 80 and still found the evidence was inadmissible. His Honour held:[9]

"The rationale underlying this fundamental principle may be expressed in various closely related ways: to admit such evidence would be to permit abdication of the judicial duty and usurpation of the judicial function; such evidence cannot be allowed to be probative or to rise higher than a submission; such evidence is necessarily irrelevant...Accordingly, evidence of opinion as to the proper application of foreign law to fact is not admissible. It would take clearer language than that of para 80(a) to displace the fundamental principle to which I have referred."

If that is the proper application of section 80 of the Evidence Act 1995, why do family report writer's recommendations amount to the same abdication?

Recently, the Full Court revisited the issue. In Andrew & Delaine,[10] the trial judge, Dawe J, largely rejected the quite specific recommendations of a family report writer. Consequently, one of the grounds of appeal was whether such rejection constituted appealable error. In dismissing the appeal, the Full Court set out observations of family reports, which their Honours (May, Boland and Strickland JJ) stressed were of a "general nature."

  • There is no magic in a family report.. The court is not bound to accept recommendations and those recommendations can never usurp the role of the court.
  • Family reports can be valuable and when the ultimate decision reflects the recommendations, it is because the court has found the recommendations are in line with the court's findings.
  • A family report writer does not have the opportunity to weigh and test the evidence as a trial judge can.
  • The facts giving rise to the family report writer's recommendations may turn out to be rejected by a trial judge.
  • Sometime, necessarily, a family report may be neutral.
  • A family report writer need not be disturbed if a court rejects the recommendations.
  • The court has the advantage of a complete forensic process whereas the report writer does not.

Another issue is that family report writers are not bound to follow the reasoning process set out by the Family Law Act 1975 and explained by the Full Court in Goode & Goode.[11] To that end, some family report writers might bring to the exercise an inherent dislike of "equal time" orders, or inherent support for them. Further, family report writers do not feel themselves bound to make findings pursuant to section 60CC of the Family Law Act 1975 and prefer, as their profession dictates, to approach an analysis of personal or family dynamics without stricture.

If the Full Court is correct, and undoubtedly they are, to what end are recommendations to a court which set out the orders the family report writer thinks the court should make? Such recommendations can be rejected and, in fact, only applied if the findings made by the court lead the court to the same conclusion. If the court comes to that conclusion independently, then the recommendations were of no assistance anyway.

It follows that in my opinion a family report writer's recommendation which sets out the orders the court might make is both unhelpful and inadmissible.

What then should a family report writer recommend? Ultimately, that should be a discourse amongst those in that profession. However, in my opinion, a family report writer's recommendation which sets out the psycho-social consequences of the parties' respective positions, analyses the interpersonal dynamics within the family group and provides insight into the parties' (and the child's) emotions and cognition will be enormously helpful and admissible.

[1] see eg. Hollington v. F Hewthorn & Co [1943] KB 587

[2] see eg. Evidence Act 1995; section 55

[3] Murphy v. R (1989) 167 CLR 94

[4] (1999) 197 CLR 269 at [110]

[5] [2008] FamCA 756

[6] ibid at [20]

[7] ibid at [54] to [55]

[8] (1996) 64 FCR 79

[9] ibid at [18] to [28]

[10] [2009] FamCAFC 182

[11] [2006] Fam CA 1376

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.