Australia: Good Faith Bargaining Insights From The USA

Last Updated: 7 October 2009

Joseph Turzi, a partner with DLA Piper in the United States has been practising labour law for approximately 20 years. With the introduction of good faith bargaining to Australia through the Fair Work Act we spoke to Joe about the way in which good faith bargaining operates in the United States law to provide guidance as to what it might mean in Australia.

A point that Joe emphasised in our discussions was that under US labour law employers are permitted to bargain hard and the obligation of bargaining good faith recognises that hard bargaining can be good faith bargaining. A party can come to the table with a position and as long as the party is willing to explain it and discuss it, taking a hard position on that proposal is lawful.

It is this critical area that has been subject to discussion in Australia and the FW Act makes it plain that the good faith bargaining requirements do not require concessions. However, in order to bargain hard you need to know where the line is so you do not cross from hard bargaining into bad faith bargaining.

DLA Phillips Fox - The concept of bargaining good faith suggests a subjective view of what might be for one person legitimate robust negotiation and for another bad faith bargaining. Has the US National Labour Relations Board (equivalent of our Fair Work Australia) been challenged in developing general principles in the area of good faith bargaining?

I think the question's a good summary actually of the difficulty. Ultimately it is a subjective view. What one person may see as hard bargaining of a legitimately held position, another person may just see as a refusal to move on a reasonable counter proposal or an attempt to force employees out on strike. So, yes, where you're coming from in terms of your point of view may be where you end up in terms of how you interpret the actions of the other party.

The USA NLR Board has been fairly successful in developing some principles. It's really in their application that the principles become complicated as to what is 'surface bargaining', for example, generally going through the motions of bargaining without any real desire to reach agreement. However, because, like many of these good faith bargaining issues, that is more about intent than substance and in fact, because substance is not an issue under US labour law, it becomes very difficult to apply a principle.

DLA Phillips Fox - How important is it to look at the totality of the conduct rather than a single behaviour in determining what is and is not good faith bargaining?

Generally, it's always the totality of the conduct that determines good or bad faith. There are, however, certain hallmark violations that a single instance of which can result in a finding of bad faith. For example, part of the obligation of bargaining good faith is the requirement that information relevant to bargaining is provided. If you simply refuse to provide information that would be a violation in and of itself of the duty to bargain in good faith. If you make yourself unavailable for bargaining, that itself will be a violation of the duty to bargain in good faith. However, other than the area of information request, it's rather rare that any single event would result in a finding of good or bad faith because both parties are sophisticated enough and have been dealing with the scheme for many years and that they avoid hallmark violations.

One that often comes up and that has developed under US labour law is that sometimes an inexperienced practitioner or employer may make the mistake, is a claim of financial inability. In bargaining an employer may wish to state that they do not consent to the wage demand, however they express this rejection by saying the payments a union is requesting may bankrupt or ruin the firm. If you have a statement of that nature which relates to the ability to pay, the union then is entitled to ask for information from the employer to prove that the employer cannot afford the union's request. This is generally something that would require an opening of the books which most companies treat as confidential or otherwise protected information or are reluctant to do so. However, once having made the affordability statement under US labour law you have an obligation to do so. So, in short where the employer makes an affordability claim and then refuses to open its books or provide evidence or information to prove its claim, that would be a violation of the duty to bargain in good faith.

Ultimately, the Board will not only look at the behaviour at the table but there is also some enquiry into the positions adopted at the table. The most significant of these is the standard of whether the proposals made on the table were so patently unreasonable that they can be said to have been designed to frustrate an agreement. So, there is some substance of review at this stage. Of course, once again, we're in an area of subjective analysis of what becomes extreme behaviour can change depending on the view you take of it.

DLA Phillips Fox - A concern for employers is that the rules in Australia that bargaining must be neither unfair nor capricious lend themselves to vague rulings and subjectivity. Has this difficulty in establishing objective criteria been an issue for you in the United States?

The simple answer is, yes. We're talking motive or intent and it is necessarily subjective, and therefore, it is virtually impossible to be certain at any point whether you were engaged in good faith or bad faith bargaining. We have a long history of decisional law which helps create guide posts, but, even then, on more difficult issues, it becomes very difficult to know where the lines are.

DLA Phillips Fox - What is your experience in applying good faith bargaining in a robust industrial negotiation?

If, by robust, we mean a difficult or challenging negotiation, the experience is, the greater the challenge of the negotiations, the more difficult it is to bargain in good faith, and by that I don't mean that the parties can't bargain in good faith, but that understanding what you need to do to bargain in good faith becomes more complicated, primarily because the parties will be looking to what advantage good faith issues produce, what leverage can be gained by preventing, or making it appear that the other side is not engaged in good faith bargaining. So, if a negotiation is difficult then a smart move for a union is to present the types of demands, whether they be information requests or bargaining demands or behaviour at the table, that would make the employer appear to have engaged in bad faith bargaining. So, what happens in a robust or challenging industrial setting is there is a lot more jockeying at the table over the issue of good and bad faith, and the substance of negotiation therefore becomes a bit more difficult. That's why a great deal of negotiations take place in 'off the record' sidebars where the parties can discuss issues more freely without concern for the good or bad faith implications that would be raised by an 'on the record' discussion at the table.

DLA Phillips Fox - An important aspect of the duty to bargain in good faith is the requirement on the parties to disclose information. What information do unions in the US typically (seek) from employers?

A union generally seeks information intrinsic to the employee/employer relationship. That type of information is considered presumptively relevant under a very broad relevant standard, and so, anything dealing with wages, benefit, terms and conditions of employment such as employee policies, will all be relevant and the Board will require it to be turned over if requested. The interesting part of information requests is when they go beyond what is presumptively relevant. There, the union has an obligation to show relevance, but again, the standard is very broad. So, what happens when you go beyond the traditional terms, conditions, wages, benefits is that unions will ask for a great deal of information, some of which it knows the employer may not want to disclose for confidentiality reasons or competitive reasons or simply because it might create some problems in the workplace, and that puts the employer in a position of either turning the information over or having engaged potentially in one of the hallmark violations, not providing information.

Unions will often make information requests for the purpose of setting up this problem for an employer. Just by way of example, one place that is often comes up is if a company has affiliated operations and/or joint venture partners. In the United States, there are principles of relatedness or scope that can make those other operations subject to bargaining with the union. The union may serve a host of information requests designed to allow it to prove the connection sufficiently to demand bargaining beyond the immediate employer.

The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers has a rather standard request for these related employer issues that numbers approximately 144 questions, getting into all kinds of details on the operation. So, there could be any number of requests that the unions raise beyond simply the immediate terms and conditions, and they could be raised for issues of gaining a tactical advantage by putting the employer in a position of saying, no, and creating a hallmark violation.

With respect to information that can be usefully sought from a union, for most employers it is rather limited. Generally, what employers would like to see are other collective bargaining agreements so you can see what other companies who have negotiated with the union have agreed to, but the Board takes the position that those are not relevant, absent some specific showing in the existing negotiations. But, with respect to most workplace issues, the employer has more information at its disposal than the union does on the issues most relevant to the bargaining.

Again, it may be a bit countercultural to some employers who naturally want to control their internal information and protect it. However, in the context of bargaining, the damage of doing that under the good faith analysis may be more than the benefit of retaining the information.

DLA Phillips Fox - What are typical examples the NLRB would consider unfair bargaining or unfair labour practice in the context of collective bargaining with the union on the part of an employer and a union?

Since the obligations are very similar, it's a broad good faith duty, the behaviours that could violate the duty are very similar on both sides as a technical matter. As a practical matter, there are some distinctions, but in general the type of activities that could be considered a refusal to bargain in good faith, refusing to supply information, refusing to meet at all. So, if you make yourself unavailable entirely, or make it very difficult to schedule meetings, that would be bad faith. Trying to dictate who the negotiators will be for each side - the union can't dictate to management who its representatives will be, nor can management dictate to the union who its representatives will be. Trying to dictate ground rules, or to bargain hard over ground rules for a negotiation, for example, what communications will take place outside the negotiating room. So, those issues cannot be bargained to impasse. They certainly can be discussed but you can't take a stand on those.

Trying to bargain directly with the employees rather than through the employees' representative, through the union, discouraging support for the union, or trying to undermine the union or its position during bargaining, making a unilateral change in terms and conditions of employment. And here is a significant difference between the obligations of management and the union during bargaining. Once a contract (EBA) has expired, under US labour law management must maintain the status quo as represented by that contract until it reaches a new agreement with the union or a good faith impasse. However, there is no statutory obligation on the union to refrain from any economic pressure, even during the term of a contract, so, during bargaining, a union is free to engage in economic pressures. For example, the union can strike at any point during bargaining. The union's even privileged to engage in what activity or certain activity that might not be protected under labour law. In other words, labour law views it as illegitimate activity, and therefore, employees who engage in that activity do not receive the protection of labour law for their actions and may be disciplined or terminated. But even that activity which not protected may be lawful and is lawful in terms of the good faith bargaining obligation. It will not be evidence of bad faith.

And, what is referred to as surface bargaining, which is going through the motions without any real intent of entering into an agreement, so you follow the process but other evidence indicates that you never have any desire or intent to enter into an agreement with the union. So, those are the types of activities we have many decades of law taking this into great detail. There are many others, but these are the most significant violations of the duty to bargain in good faith.

© DLA Phillips Fox

DLA Phillips Fox is one of the largest legal firms in Australasia and a member of DLA Piper Group, an alliance of independent legal practices. It is a separate and distinct legal entity. For more information visit

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.