Australia: CTP Update

Last Updated: 15 September 2009
Article by Dean Katsavos and Paul Baxter

In this update we look at two recent CTP decisions covering different issues. White v Australian Associated Motor Insurers Ltd (Nos 1&2) [2009] QSC 141 & 142 considered a nervous shock claim brought out of time and Dawes Underwriting Australia Pty Ltd v Roth [2009] NSWCA 152 highlights the dangers for insurers of not having stringent procedures in place to deal with an insured's 'loose' disclosure.


Nervous shock claims often throw up difficult limitation period issues. Psychiatric injury can be slow to emerge, hard to identify, difficult to attribute to a specific cause and highly subjective. Often insurers/defendants are forced to make an early call whether to concede extension of the period or fight the issue with very limited information. The Queensland Supreme Court's decision in White v Australian Associated Motor Insurers Ltd (Nos 1&2) [2009] QSC 141 & 142 reveals another option may exist.

Key Point:

  • In latent nervous shock claims it is important to consider all options for resolution of limitation period issues and choose the best one for the particular case.

The Facts

The plaintiff was a serving police officer who suffered psychiatric injury after he attended the scene of two motor vehicle accidents, one in January 2006 and the other in August 2007. He began legal proceedings for damages against the drivers of the vehicles (and their insurers) that were allegedly responsible for the accidents. However, he did not bring his claim until after the three year time limitation period for the first accident had expired.

The plaintiff sought a declaration he had complied with the pre-litigation notice requirements for motor vehicle accidents in Queensland in accordance with the Motor Accident Insurance Act 1994 (Qld). The plaintiff needed to show a reasonable excuse for the delay in notifying the claim. He alleged his psychiatric injury did not become apparent until years after the two motor vehicle accidents and only after he consulted a psychiatrist in mid-2008.

The plaintiff had to prove that he had a reasonable excuse for not notifying the claim sooner than he did. The judge openly conceded that claims involving psychiatric injuries are difficult to determine because the underlying disorder may not readily become apparent to a lay person, or the person suffering the disorder may not be able to recollect when the symptoms first appeared. A plaintiff may also be dishonest about when symptoms first arose. On the facts, the judge found contradictory evidence as to precisely when the plaintiff became aware of his psychiatric symptoms.

The judge could not justly resolve these issues at a preliminary hearing on patchy affidavit evidence and consequently he declined to make the declaration sought. However, the judge authorised the applicant to proceed further with the claim despite the possible notification noncompliance. The judge effectively left this decision and the limitation period issue to be decided at trial on the totality of the evidence.

It is apparent the judge did not consider it fair for the insurer to be forced to fight limitation period issues in preliminary or interlocutory proceedings. The judge decided that the facts and issues necessary to determine whether the plaintiff's claim fell foul of notification and limitation could only be properly determined at a full trial.


This case is important for insurers because it grants a plaintiff procedural permission to continue with a claim that is brought out of time but reserves the statutory limitation period defence for later argument. This sets a precedent for defendant insurers to waive procedural compliance anomalies while preserving limitation period rights. Concession of an extension to the limitation period may still be appropriate in certain circumstances. Alternatively, the parties may elect to resolve the issue as a preliminary point. Importantly however, in appropriate circumstances, a defendant may reserve its arguments to trial when the fullest evidence is available. This also has the secondary benefit of more comprehensive rights of appeal.


In Dawes Underwriting Australia Pty Ltd v Roth [2009] NSWCA 152 a motor vehicle insurer declined indemnity to its insured, for an extensively damaged 2004 Ferrari F360 valued at $350,000, because the traffic and claims history the insured provided when he took out the policy was incomplete. The Court found the non-disclosure to be accidental, not fraudulent, and unlikely to have changed the underwriting decision.

Key Points:

  • To prove fraud, an insured must have a clear intention to engage in dishonesty.
  • Insurers should have clear and documented underwriting guidelines to avoid argument that proper disclosure would not have removed cover.
  • For discretionary cover in special circumstances, clear written parameters can avoid open ended potential liability.
  • Any discrepancies in the insured's disclosure should be identified and investigated prior to confirming insurance cover.
  • Well drafted insurance policy wordings should clearly specify the consequences to an insured of any failure to properly disclose their driving or claims history.

The Facts

The insuring agent, Dawes, specialised in performance and prestige vehicles and in its proposal documents asked various questions about important risk factors such as accidents and insurance claims, traffic offences and licence suspension. The Ferrari owner, Mr Roth was under 30 years of age. He disclosed only one claim or accident (which he categorised as 'not at fault') out of an actual five in the past five years. One of the four claims overlooked was an 'at fault' collision four years prior. From his five year driving offence record he disclosed only a ticket for using a mobile phone while driving and one speeding (less than 15 km/h over the limit) offence. He neglected to mention the following additional offences:

  • Speeding – more than 45 km/h over the limit – four years prior – licence suspended.
  • Speeding – between 15 and 30 km/h over the limit – two and a half years prior.

With regard to licence cancellation, he disclosed one suspension eight years prior while still a P plate driver. He failed to disclose the later suspension only four years prior as a result of the more excessive speeding offence.

Dawes' CEO Mr Garnett made the initial decision to underwrite the policy for a premium of $8,000 per year with a variable $10,000 to $15,000 excess. He gave evidence that if full and proper disclosure had been made by Roth at the outset he would never have taken on the risk. Therefore under sections 54 and 28 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) the insurer was entitled to reduce its liability under the policy to nil, the amount it would have been liable to pay if Roth had disclosed all the required information up front.

Garnett pointed to underwriting guidelines which noted 'Declined Risks' to include 'any driver who has lost a licence or had a four point speeding fine in the last five years, any insured or driver who has had two 'at fault' claims or three of any type of claim or accident in the last three years, and under 30 drivers without a three year driving history of no accidents, claims or serious speeding offences'. The guidelines therefore provided three separate justifications to decline cover to Mr Roth. However they also mentioned a discretionary 'Second Chance Scheme' which allowed cover for insureds with an inferior driving record at higher premium loadings. Mr Garnett said Roth would not have qualified under this scheme based on his judgment that the combination of young age, vehicle type and offence/ penalty record rendered Roth an unacceptable risk.

Roth called evidence from an expert underwriter who thought the risk was insurable under the 'Second Chance Scheme'. Mr Roth was just the sort of driver this scheme was intended for. However there were no detailed guidelines for the scheme and its implementation remained solely discretionary.


Both the trial judge and the Court of Appeal found that:

  • The insured's disclosure and misrepresentations were not fraudulent. The insured was careless but did not act recklessly, without caring if information was true or false and with no honest belief in the truth of the disclosure. Roth said he misread the disclosure period for licence disqualification, and believed it to be five years as opposed to the required 10 years. In various conversations and documents his disclosure varied slightly, perhaps flagging his loose approach to the enquiry.
  • An allegation of fraud must meet the high hurdle of proving that there is 'no honest belief in the truth of the disclosure' because an allegation of fraud demands a clear intention on the part of the insured to engage in dishonesty. At best, disclosure was careless.
  • It is for the insurer to prove that it would have acted differently in providing the insurance cover, had the insured made full and proper disclosure. Irrespective of the insured's lack of proper disclosure or misrepresentations, Dawes would still have agreed to provide insurance cover to the insured and there would have been no significant difference to the terms of that insurance.
  • The discrepancies between the insured's various disclosures were apparent to Dawes, yet it failed to investigate the discrepancies. The Court concluded that this failure to investigate suggested that Dawes did not place reliance on the matters that were disclosed in the Proposal Form, prior to giving insurance cover.

© DLA Phillips Fox

DLA Phillips Fox is one of the largest legal firms in Australasia and a member of DLA Piper Group, an alliance of independent legal practices. It is a separate and distinct legal entity. For more information visit

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.