Australia: Service Of Notices By Email Under The Building And Construction Industry Security Of Payment Act

Last Updated: 24 July 2009
Article by Michael Mitchell

Reed v Eire [2009] NSWSC 678

In Brief

  • A head contractor sought to challenge an adjudication under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW).
  • An important issue arose as to the precise date of service by email of a Payment Claim, and noting the Electronic Transaction Act 2000 (NSW).
  • In the particular circumstances, the Adjudicator's decision could not be challenged. The court also found that arguably incorrect statements in the Adjudication Application were not misleading or deceptive, and that there had been no denial of natural justice.


The plaintiff head contractor entered into a construction contract with the defendant sub-contractor on 10 November 2006, covering civil works associated with a rising main to a water treatment plant.

The contract1 specified the manner in which notices were to be served. These included that notices may be sent by email to a specified officer of the plaintiff at a specified email address.

On 6 November 2008, Ms Barr of the defendant sent an email to several email addresses of the plaintiff. This attached a Payment Claim pursuant to the Building and Construction Industry Security for Payment Act 1999 (NSW) (SOPA) for $610,179.32 claimed to be due to the defendant under the contract. It was sent to the email address of Mr M Diver, an officer of the plaintiff, and also copied to three other persons, one of whom was the authorised contact person of the plaintiff under the contract.

On 7 November 2008 at 5.30 pm the defendant received an electronic Read Receipt by email, indicating that "mdiver" had opened and acknowledged receipt of the email sent the day before.

On 21 November 2008, the plaintiff sent a Payment Schedule pursuant to s 14 of SOPA to the defendant, which disputed all but $52,487.50 of the amount in the Payment Claim. This was precisely 10 business days after 7 November 2008, and therefore within the period required by Division 1 of the Act if the Payment Claim had been served on that day, but not if it had been served on 6 November 2008.

On 5 December 2008, the defendant lodged an Adjudication Application with an authorised adjudicator under SOPA. The Adjudication Application set out a number of contentions on behalf of the defendant, one of which was that the Payment Claim had been served on the plaintiff on 6 November 2008 (i.e. the date on which the email had been sent by Ms Barr).

The plaintiff was entitled to lodge an Adjudication Response under SOPA setting out substantive responses to the allegations in the Adjudication Application2. It had until 16 December 2008 to do this. However it did not do so. Rather, on 12 December 2008, the plaintiff lodged a written submission with the Adjudicator, which contended that on the basis of a date of service of the Payment Claim of 6 November 2008, the plaintiff had failed to serve its Payment Schedule in response within 10 business days. Therefore s 17(2) of SOPA was engaged, which the plaintiff contended should have prevented the defendant from commencing the adjudication process when it did.

The defendant lodged counter-submissions on 15 December 2008, which inter alia attached Mr Diver's Read Receipt, and submitted that service of the Payment Claim had actually been effected on 7 November 2008, when he (apparently) received the email, and that this was in fact within the 10 business day period prescribed by Division 1 of SOPA. The plaintiff lodged further submissions in reply on 17 December 2008.

The adjudicator considered the submissions of both sides. He made a finding that service of the payment claim was actually effected on 7 November 2008, as indicated by the Read Receipt. It followed that the payment schedule was served within the 10 business days, and there was therefore no need to for him to determine whether compliance with s 17(2) of SOPA had occurred. The adjudicator made a determination in favour of the defendant for $555,602.82

Application to Supreme Court of NSW

The plaintiff applied to the Equity Division of the Supreme Court of NSW to set aside the adjudicator's determination. The application came before Macready AsJ. He noted that the plaintiff's challenge was made on three grounds:

First Ground: challenge to the adjudicator's finding that service of the payment claim was effected on 7 November 2008

The plaintiff argued that the adjudicator's decision was a nullity because he wrongly held that service of the Payment Claim was effected on 7 November 2008, instead of 6 November 2008.

Macready AsJ noted that the Adjudicator had not considered s 13(3) of the Electronic Transactions Act 2000 (NSW).3 His Honour held that "an email address is not simply a passive description of where mail should go but it is an active information system which performs a function within the meaning of the Electronic Transactions Act".4 However, no evidence had been provided to the adjudicator indicating when or if the email had reached such an active information system, ie an email server from which the recipient could access the email. There was therefore some doubt as to whether the adjudicator had sufficient evidence to reach any conclusion on the date and time when service by email was effected.

However, Macready AsJ held that this did not matter because the adjudicator's finding on this point could not be challenged, whether right or wrong. He followed the reasoning of Rein J in JAR Developments Pty Ltd v Castleplex Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 737 at [49], that:

"an adjudication in which the adjudicator erroneously but bona fide and in accordance with the rules of natural justice determines, that a requisite time limit has been met, will not thereby be rendered void".

Macready AsJ held:

"given that the adjudicator in this matter has plainly considered the submissions that were put to him, there is no nullity if the adjudicator got it wrong. He was entitled to come to his decision whether right or wrong and the decision cannot be attacked on this basis".

Second ground: Misleading or Deceptive Conduct in Adjudication Application

The plaintiff complained that the defendant's Adjudication Application was misleading or deceptive, contrary to s 52 of the Trade Practice Act 1974 (Cth), in that it stated that the date of service of the Payment Claim was 6 November 2008, which therefore meant that the plaintiff must have served its Payment Schedule in response more than 10 business days later. The plaintiff complained that it had been misled into believing that there was an issue in relation to compliance with s 17(2) of SOPA, and had therefore not filed an Adjudication Response.

Macready AsJ noted that Mr Diver gave evidence, and confirmed that he opened the email serving the Payment Claim on 7 November 2008, as indicated by the Read Receipt. He would have seen that the Payment Claim actually bore the date 6 November 2008. There was evidence indicating that other managers of the plaintiff besides Mr Diver made various decisions thereafter, however the plaintiff adduced no evidence from those other managers.

Macready AsJ held that he could not be satisfied that the statement in the Adjudication Application amounted to misleading or deceptive conduct for two reasons:

  1. In the absence of evidence from the final decision-maker(s), he could not be satisfied that the alleged misleading or deceptive conduct led to the defendant taking any particular action to its detriment.
  2. the nature of the adjudication application, which did no more than set out one party's contention as to what would be advanced in a disputed adjudication, meant that statements therein could not be said on their face to be misleading or deceptive.

Third ground: Denial of Natural Justice

The plaintiff relied on essentially the same facts to found a claim that it had been denied natural justice. It complained that the defendant changed its position in its submission dated 15 December 2008, as it now claimed that the correct date of service of the Payment Claim was 7 November 2008 (rather than 6 November 2008 as claimed in the original Adjudication Application), and relied on the Read Receipt as evidence thereof. The plaintiff complained that the Adjudicator did not seek further submissions from the plaintiff on the point, nor indicate to the plaintiff that he was now considering the matter on an altered factual basis.

The court rejected this argument. The plaintiff raised an issue relating to service of the Payment Claim on 6 November 2008 in its submission dated 12 December 2008. On 15 December 2008 the defendant by submission responded to this and contended that service of the Payment Claim actually occurred on 7 November 2008; The plaintiff then served submissions in reply on this point, on 17 December 2008. Regardless, at all times the plaintiff and its officers were aware of the relevant facts, including those on which the defendant contended that service was on 7 November 2008. The plaintiff therefore had sufficient knowledge and time to provide an Adjudication Response if it had chosen to do so.

Furthermore, the adjudicator had considered each of the parties' submissions, thus there was no lack of procedural fairness.

Macready AsJ therefore dismissed the plaintiff's application with costs.


  • The issue of precise time of service of documents by email will continue to arise in relation to security of payment issues, and construction contracts generally, noting that contracts such as GC21 make specific provision for service by email.
  • Macready AsJ's observations on the effect of the Electronic Transactions Act 2000 (NSW) will continue to be of relevance, in particular his finding that an email address is an "information system" as defined by that Act.
  • When calculating the tight time requirements under Security of Payment legislation, parties to construction contracts must bear in mind that actual dates of electronic service may not be as they appear on the face of email communications.


1 Which included standard GC21 construction terms

2 Under the SOPA adjudication scheme, the Adjudication Application is analogous to a statement of claim in court litigation, and the Adjudication Response is analogous to a notice of grounds of defence

3 Section 13(3) of the Electronic Transactions Act 2000 (NSW) provides: "(3) For the purposes of a law of this jurisdiction, if the addressee of an electronic communication has designated an information system for the purpose of receiving electronic communications, then, unless otherwise agreed between the originator and the addressee of the electronic communication, the time of receipt of the electronic communication is the time when the electronic communication enters that information system".

4 See judgment at [30]

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.