A recent decision in the Supreme Court raises issues for
landlords and tenants when reviewing rent for retail shop leases.
In its 9 June 2009 decision in Connor Hunter v Keencrest Pty Ltd
& Ors  QCA 156, the majority of the Supreme Court found
that clauses in a retail lease which provided that on review, rent
could not fall below the previous year's rent, were valid.
In this matter, a retail shop lease stated that rent would be
reviewed annually in line with the relevant Consumer Price Index
increase, as long as the reviewed rent was not lower than the rent
for the previous year. The lease also stated that if an option for
a further term was exercised, rent was to be reviewed to market
rent, as long as the rent for the first year of the option term was
not lower than the rent for the last year of the initial term.
The Court found that the provisions of this lease were valid. It
held that a rent review clause in a retail shop lease will not
necessarily be invalidated if it provides for a method of rent
review (for example, to CPI), and also states that on review, the
rent may not fall below the previous year's rent.
Leases which provide for rents to be reviewed to the greater of
two methods of calculation (for example, the greater of CPI or a
percentage increase) will still be invalid under the Retail Shop
Leases Act 1994 (Qld).
Although the explanatory notes to the Act stated that the
intention of section 27 was to prevent ratchet clauses, the Court
found that the provisions of the Act clearly did not exclude the
review in the lease.
The Court reasoned that percentage reviews, which are permitted
by the Act, are arguably also 'ratchet clauses', as these
reviews do not allow the rent to decrease. The Court also
considered that a reference to the previous year's rent was not
a basis or method of review of rent in the meaning of s27 of the
Act, which says that a lease cannot provide for more than one basis
of review on a review date.
This decision overturns the generally held view that such
minimum rent provisions are void and allows landlords to combine
the flexibility of CPI and market reviews with the certainty of a
minimum rent. However, care should still be taken when drafting
rent review clauses in order to avoid wording that could be
interpreted as creating a method of review, rather than simply a
proviso that the rent will not decrease.
Landlords and tenants should be careful before relying on this
decision. It could be premature to permanently amend lease
documents based on this decision, and it may be wise to wait until
some time has passed to see if the case is appealed or if the
legislation is amended.
For more information regarding this case or other rental issues
for landlords and tenants, please contact HopgoodGanim's
Commercial and Retail Leasing team.
The Council announced planning policies to encourage more inner suburban retirement village and aged care development.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).