Australia: Nominal Defendant Found Liable For Injury Caused By Diesel Spill

Last Updated: 15 May 2009
Article by Peter Hunt

Dominello v Nominal Defendant [2009] NSWCA 95
Beazley, McFarlane JJA and Hodgson AJA

In Brief

  • Where a driver loses control of a vehicle on a slippery road, liability may not be established even where the driver was traveling at an excessive speed. Liability may be avoided if the evidence shows that the defendant would have lost control even if he or she were driving at a reasonable speed for the prevailing circumstances.
  • The Nominal Defendant may be liable for injury caused by fuel left on the surface of the road where the only reasonable inference from the circumstances is that the fuel spill was caused by circumstances which involved negligence by the owner or driver of the unidentified vehicle.
  • The failure to properly replace a fuel cap constitutes negligence "in the driving of the vehicle" and also constitutes "a defect in the vehicle".


The NSW Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Dominello v Nominal Defendant on 8 May 2009.

On 3 July 2000, the plaintiff was a passenger in a Toyota Hiace van driven by her husband, the first defendant, which was travelling along the Pacific Highway south of Grafton. The first defendant's vehicle ran off the road and hit a tree, causing the plaintiff severe injury.

The plaintiff sued both the first defendant and the Nominal Defendant.

The accident occurred on a downhill, left hand curve, when the first defendant lost control of the van. The first defendant was hauling a box trailer. He was driving at 100 kph, in accordance with the speed limit, but contrary to an advisory sign suggesting that 85 kph was a safe speed for the bend. The road was wet as a consequence of light rain.

A finding was made by the trial judge that diesel fuel had been spilt on the south-bound lane. The plaintiff alleged that the diesel spilled from an unidentified heavy truck because a cap on it fuel tank had not been properly replaced.

At first instance, damages were assessed at $2,775,035, which was not challenged on appeal.

Judgment was entered in favour of the plaintiff against the first defendant. The trial judge found that a driver exercising reasonable care would have maintained a speed of 75 to 80 kph in the prevailing circumstances.

The plaintiff's cause of action against the Nominal Defendant was dismissed. The trial judge held that the means by which the plaintiff argued that the diesel fuel came to be on the road was but one of many ways this may have occurred, with or without negligence.

The first defendant appealed from the finding that he was negligent. The plaintiff appealed from the finding that the Nominal Defendant was not liable. The Nominal Defendant filed a Notice of Contention placing in issue whether the negligent failure to secure a fuel cap fell within the statutory CTP indemnity.

Court of Appeal

Liability of Driver

The leading Judgment in respect of the first defendant's liability was delivered by McFarlane JA, with whom Beazley JA agreed. Hodgson JA came to the same conclusion as the majority, but for different reasons.

Justice McFarlane accepted the trial judge's findings that a speed of 100 kph was excessive for the downhill bend, given that he was hauling a box trailer and the road was damp.

However, at paragraphs 34 to 36, McFarlane JA held that the trial judge erred in finding that the first defendant could have regained control of his vehicle – after losing control on the diesel – if he we driving at 75 to 80 kph:

"34 In these circumstances, the plaintiff's claim against the first defendant must fail because she did not establish, that on the balance of probabilities, that the first defendant would have been able to regain control of his vehicle if he had been travelling at what was found to be a reasonable speed (see also the recent decisions in Dunleavy v Peak [2009] NSWCA 72 and Gett v Tabet [2009] NSWCA 76 at [364 – 389]). There was a prospect that at that lower speed he could have done so, and thereby avoided the accident, but that prospect is not sufficient to show that the increased risk created by his driving at an excessive speed materially contributed to the accident. The position would have been otherwise if the primary judge's finding that it is likely that at the lower speed the first defendant would have regained control could have been supported.

"35 My conclusion is consistent with the decision in Chappel v Hart in which it was held, by majority, that a doctor's negligent failure to advise a patient about the possible risks of surgery materially contributed to the injury suffered by the patient during the operation the doctor performed.

"36 It was clear on the facts of the case that, on the balance of probabilities, the patient would not have suffered the injury if the required advice had been given because, if the advice had been given, the surgery would either not have been performed at all or would have been performed by a more experienced surgeon. In the hands of a more experienced surgeon the plaintiff would probably not have suffered the injury in question. Each of the members of the majority indicated this to be the case (see Gaudron J at [20], Gummow J at [67] and Kirby J at [99]). In the present case, there was only a prospect, and not a probability, that if the first defendant had not been negligent, the accident would have been avoided."

Given this reasoning, the Court of Appeal held that the trial judge erred in finding the first defendant liable.

Liability of Nominal Defendant

The leading Judgment on the issue of the Nominal Defendant's liability was delivered by Handley AJA, with whom Beazley and McFarlane JJA agreed.

From paragraphs 87 to 91, Handley AJA held that the only reasonable inference which could be drawn from the available evidence was that diesel was spilled on the road through the mechanism argued by the plaintiff; namely, a loose fuel cap.

"87 In my judgment alternative hypotheses that the spill came from a 4WD, an industrial tanker, or from a sudden rupture or weld failure on a fuel tank are either not open on the evidence or are highly improbable.

"88 The remaining inference, not excluded by the evidence, is that the spillage came from the failure of a refueller to replace or properly replace the cap on the diesel tank of a heavy vehicle. The Nominal Defendant could only be liable if the refueller was a driver. Contrary to the Judge's view (Red 69) it would not matter if this was a previous driver. It would matter if the refueller was someone other than a driver.

"89 Refuelling at Grafton at that hour of the night must have been done by the driver at a self-service outlet. The possibility that the spill at that hour came from an industrial tanker can be discounted for the reasons already given. The possibility that the absent or badly fitted cap was the fault of a refueller in Brisbane, other than a driver, can also be discounted because the fuel in the tanks would have been reduced to a safe level by prior spillage and normal consumption long before this bend.

"90 This means that the remaining hypothesis contended for by the plaintiff is more probable than the others, collectively and individually.

"91 The presence of the spill on the first significant downhill curve south of Grafton and the absence of a similar spillage on the previous 16 kms, or on the next 20 kms to the south, or on the steep section of the Highway north of Grafton leads to the inference that something happened in Grafton. Something that caused a fuel spill on this reverse bend where the super elevation, first to the right, and then to the left (Blue 40) would cause the fuel to slosh about in the tank."

In respect of the Nominal Defendant's Notice of Contention, Handley JA held that the injury caused by the failure to secure the petrol cap fell within the scope of the CTP indemnity contemplated by the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999. At paragraphs 102 and 103, his Honour held that the injury was either caused during the driving of the vehicle or as result of a defect in the vehicle.

"102 On the findings proposed these requirements are satisfied. The inferred fault is that of the driver of the unidentified vehicle and it occurred in the use of the vehicle. Refuelling a vehicle, which enables it to be driven, is part of its maintenance, and part of its use. Although the vehicle is not being driven while it is being refuelled, it is being used to receive and hold the fuel just as it may be used to receive and hold chattels or passengers. The plaintiff's injury was the result of the driving of the unidentified vehicle, and caused when the driving caused the spill. The injury was also caused by the driver's fault during the driving when he failed to remember that he had not replaced the fuel cap and stop his vehicle to do this.

"103 The injury was also caused by the driver's fault during the driving of the vehicle by a defect in the vehicle, its open fuel tank. The fuel cap is an important part of the vehicle because it can prevent loss of fuel by spillage and its contamination by airborne material. A vehicle without a fuel cap has a defect and it has another if an available fuel cap is not fitted, or not properly fitted."

As such, the Court of Appeal held that the trial judge erred in finding no liability in the Nominal Defendant.


The major point of interest in Dominello v Nominal Defendant is the finding that the Nominal Defendant may be liable for injury caused by a fuel spill even where there is no direct evidence as to what caused the fuel to come onto the road.

In the previous decision of Johnson v Nominal Defendant [2003] NSWCA 153, the Court of Appeal stressed that it could not be assumed that a fuel spill was caused by the negligence of the owner or driver of a motor vehicle. Without evidence, a range of other possible causes could be envisaged including that a fuel pipe burst without warning and without negligence or that the spill was caused by the negligence of a person other than the owner of driver of the vehicle, such as a mechanic or a petrol station attendant.

Whilst Johnson v Nominal Defendant does not appear to have been analysed by the Court of Appeal in Dominello, the same principles were applied.

The outcome appears to have been different because the plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to establish that the most probable cause of the spill was that the diesel sloshed through an open tank whilst the truck negotiated a downhill, bending road and that it was more likely than not that the driver of the vehicle failed to secure the fuel cap when he refilled the vehicle at Grafton.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.