Australia: First case on the duty of a debenture trustee under section 283DA(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth): Oztech Pty Ltd v Public Trustee of Queensland (No 15) [2018] FCA 819


Over the course of a 258 page decision, the Federal Court of Australia has, in Oztech Pty Ltd v Public Trustee of Queensland (No 15) [2018] FCA 819, decided a case in favour of a corporate trustee in proceedings commenced by a noteholder. The proceedings were predicated on breaches of section 283DA(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), equitable duties owed by trustees, as well as asserted breaches of fiduciary duty and unconscionable conduct, and engaging in fraudulent concealment.

In the course of coming to its decision, the Federal Court set out the scope of a debenture trustee’s duty under section 283DA of the Corporations Act.  In short, debenture trustees have extensive monitoring obligations, but those obligations are not tantamount to those of auditors or the managers of the business affairs of the entities issuing the notes/debentures or the persons subscribing to those notes/debentures.

We focus in this Limelight on the Court’s decision in respect of section 283DA(a) and the equitable duties of trustees.


The Octaviar Group was comprised of a number of companies, engaged in the business of tourism, property funds management and financial services. The group’s holding company was Octaviar Limited. For simplicity, all entities within the Octaviar Group will be referred to as “Octaviar”.

From 2 November 2006 onwards, via some of its companies, (Octaviar), issued notes/debentures under prospectus to the public. The Public Trustee of Queensland (Public Trustee) was the debenture trustee under section 283AA of the Corporations Act pursuant to a trust deed.

The notes in question had a maturity date of 30 December 2011 (maturity date).  Octaviar was required to maintain net assets of $280 million (net asset covenant), being a protective requirement to ensure that there were sufficient assets to repay the notes.

Oztech Pty Ltd was a subscriber to the notes.

Between 2 November 2006 and February 2007, $146.7 million in notes had been issued.  On 23 February 2007, Octaviar issued a prospectus which offered further notes with a total face value of $160 million and with an ability to accept oversubscription up to a further $50 million.

Over the same period and following:

  • Octaviar released reports and published ASX announcements that were positive and reflected a strong financial position; and
  • the Public Trustee asked Price Waterhouse Coopers (PwC) to report to it as to the financial position of Octaviar and crucially, whether it would be able to pay the notes back by the maturity date. PwC responded with a number of reports, the first of which, indicated that there was no information to suggest that Octaviar would not be able to repay the notes by the maturity date.

However, as time progressed PwC reported that:

  • the Public Trustee ought to obtain an increase of the net asset covenant from $280 million to $672 million. There was no power under any of the instruments that the Public Trustee was a party to that permitted it to require an increase of the net asset covenant;
  • it was “unable, based on the information on hand, to form an opinion as to whether [Octaviar] will have the ability to meet scheduled debt repayments by the [maturity date], [and that accordingly], the Public Trustee should assess these risks against [its] own risk appetite…”

On 18 January 2008, Octaviar published an ASX announcement.  That ASX announcement was received badly by the market and resulted in Octaviar’s share price falling from $3.18 to $0.99.

Octaviar went into liquidation later in 2008 with the effect that the holders of notes suffered significant losses.

As a noteholder, Oztech brought representative proceedings against the Public Trustee, alleging that the Public Trustee breached section 283DA of the Corporations Act and its equitable duties by failing to exercise reasonable diligence to ascertain whether the property of Octaviar would be sufficient to repay the amount deposited or lent when it became due. In essence, Oztech alleged that by about January 2008, the Public Trustee should have concluded that Octaviar was insolvent, demanded repayment of the notes and moved to wind-up Octaviar. It was alleged that, had the Public Trustee taken such steps, the significant losses would have been avoided.

Specifically, Oztech asserted that the Public Trustee failed to:

  • have required Octaviar to submit management accounting reports on a monthly basis to enable the Public Trustee to monitor Octaviar’s financial position. It was not sufficient for the Public Trustee to rely only on quarterly accounts and published financial accounts (Information Request Duty); and
  • retain PwC or another investigative accountant to prepare a more extensive report, following receipt of a report from PwC that suggested that PwC was not certain whether repayments on the notes could be made by the maturity date (Investigation Duty).

Section 283DA

Sections 283DA(a) to (c) of the Corporations Act state:

The trustee of a trust deed entered into under section 283AA must:

(a) exercise reasonable diligence to ascertain whether the property of the borrower and of each guarantor that is or should be available (whether by way of security or otherwise) will be sufficient to repay the amount deposited or lent when it becomes due; and

(b) exercise reasonable diligence to ascertain whether the borrower or any guarantor has committed any breach of:

(i)         the terms of the debentures; or
(ii)        the provisions of the trust deed or this Chapter; and

(c) do everything in its power to ensure that the borrower or a guarantor remedies any breach known to the trustee of:

(i)         any term of the debentures; or
(ii)        provision of the trust deed or this Chapter;

unless the trustee is satisfied that the breach will not materially prejudice the debenture holders’ interests or any security for the debentures

The Decision

The Federal Court found that the Public Trustee did not breach its statutory and equitable duties.

Statutory duties

The Court found that pursuant to section 283DA(a) of the Corporations Act, the Public Trustee owed a duty to exercise reasonable diligence to ascertain whether the property of the borrower (i.e. the issuer of the debentures) and of each guarantor that is or should be available will be sufficient to repay the amount deposited or lent when it becomes due.

The Court observed that there was no authority on the application of section 283DA(a) and the parties had not submitted any authority on the provision.  To this end, the Court considered itself uninstructed by authority, and set out the parameters of the statutory duty as follows:

  • the duty cast on a trustee is forward-looking. This is signified by the provision’s use of the words “will be sufficient to repay the amount … when it becomes due”. The determination of sufficiency is to be made by reference to “property … that is or should be available” at that time;
  • there is, in substance, only one inquiry. It concerns the present ascertainment of the sufficiency in value or amount of the property that “is or should be available” at the future time. The words “is or should be available” are to be read as a whole, with the modal “should” expressing no more than a present expectation of a future state of affairs;
  • the duty is constant in the sense that it is ever-present. The duty requires diligence to be exercised by the trustee so long as the trustee remains in office;
  • the constancy of the trustee’s duty is not tempered by the word “reasonable”. However, the word “reasonable” tempers the steps required, through the exercise of diligence, to achieve the object of ascertaining whether the property will or should be sufficient to repay the amount at the future time;
  • what constitutes “reasonable diligence”will depend on the circumstances as they change and unfold over time.  In this connection, what is “reasonable” will depend on how those circumstances present at the time they occur;
  • section 283DA(a) requires an element of “active monitoring” or surveillance of financial position and performance. This “active monitoring” applies constantly over the period of the trusteeship. The requirement for active monitoring is assimilated into section 283DA(a) by virtue of the requirement to “ascertain” – not merely to inquire without satisfaction as to the outcome of the inquiry;
  • “reasonable diligence to ascertain” requires a trustee to take into account the reporting regimes provided by the Corporations Act as well as those that might be imposed by the debentures or the trust deed. It must also take into account the announcements and disclosures required under, say, the disclosure obligations of the ASX Listing Rules where applicable. However, the trustee’s duty under s 283DA(a) “to ascertain” is not limited to such matters, and the extent of the inquiry to be made by a trustee is dependent on the circumstances;
  • the requirement to “ascertain” is not designed to assimilate the trustee’s duty with that of a manager of the borrower’s and guarantor’s business affairs. The extent of the monitoring is a matter to be determined by reference to the circumstances of each case, but a trustee is not required to presumptively approach the material provided to it as being inaccurate or misleading;
  • equally, the trustee is not to be cast in the role of an auditor of the borrower’s and guarantor’s businesses and affairs, but by the same token, the trustee “is to be more than a supine observer of events”;
  • section 283DA(a) does not impose on the trustee the need to undertake measures that in terms of costs and difficulty, are not commensurate with the task at hand. But the trustee’s duty under s 283DA(a) is not curtailed by considerations of costs, difficulty or inconvenience when circumstances require the trustee to act in performance of the duty to exercise the required diligence; and
  • the duty cast on the trustee by section 283DA is forward-looking in nature. Historical matters ought not to be the primary concern of a trustee, except to the extent that they assist in forming the forward-looking assessment.

Sections 283DA(b) and (c) also required that the Public Trustee to exercise reasonable diligence to ascertain whether the borrower or any guarantor has committed any breach of the terms of the debentures, the provisions of the trust deed or Chapter 2L of the Corporations Act and must do everything in its power to ensure that the borrower or guarantor remedies any breach that is known to it, unless it is satisfied that the breach will not materially prejudice the interests of debenture holders or any security for the debentures.

  Equitable duty

The standard of care required to discharge a trustee’s equitable duty to debenture/noteholders is the standard an ordinary prudent person of business would exercise in the conduct of a business as if it were his or her own, although the trustee’s duty to exercise reasonable care may be qualified by the terms of the trust instrument.

In assessing whether such a duty has been satisfied, a Court is to look at the position that would have appeared to the trustee, acting prudently, at the time of the alleged breach.

Where there are a range of possible courses a trustee can take, the mere choice of one course over another will not necessarily signal a breach of duty, even if the choice is later shown to be an error of judgment. In those cases, a breach of the duty of care will only arise when a trustee’s chosen course of action falls outside the range of possible choices which the trustee, acting reasonably, could have chosen at the relevant time.


The Court found that there was no breach of the Information Request Duty because there was no obligation on the Public Trustee to obtain any additional financial information.  According to the Court, this was because:

  • any financial information sought would not have assisted the Public Trustee in determining the capacity to repay the notes, given that any financial information the Public Trustee requested would have been 4 years out of the date by the time of the maturity date, and incapable of determining whether the notes could be repaid at that future time;
  • the nature of Octaviar’s business was such that losses could accrue on a month to month basis. The reality of Octaviar’s business and the impact of it on the monthly accounts would not have assisted the Public Trustee to determine whether the notes would be repaid by the maturity date or whether Octaviar was insolvent;
  • the publicly available information available about Octaviar’s financial position was positive, meaning that there was nothing to suggest that repayment of the notes by the maturity date was under threat or that Octaviar was insolvent; and
  • there was no recommendation by PwC that the Public Trustee ought to obtain further financial information from Octaviar.

The Court equally considered that the Public Trustee did not have to undertake the Investigation Duty because at no point in time was there a single fact which indicated that Octaviar was in any financial distress or insolvent.


Although the Public Trustee successfully defended this claim, it is clear from this judgment that  trustees’ duties under section 283DA of the Corporations Act  and in equity are extensive and onerous.

It is insufficient that trustees approach their appointments as a box-ticking exercise.  To this end, although the extensive nature of a trustee’s duties do not transform the trustee into an auditor or manager of the affairs of the debenture issuer, or require a trustee to presume that information provided to it is misleading or inaccurate, a trustee is obliged to actively monitor developments within its portfolio throughout the life of its appointment and act accordingly.

The precise nature of the extent of the “active monitoring” that is required will depend on the circumstances of each case, but ultimately, trustees should always approach the task of each appointment as though they were managing the interests and concerns of their own business affairs, assets and money.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions