Australia: A Developing Trend – Disputes Funding For Corporates

Last Updated: 10 November 2017
Article by Philippa Murphy


According to global law firm Norton Rose Fulbright, and as evidenced by the firm's 2016 Litigation Trends Annual Survey, the use of third party funders in commercial (and other) litigation is transforming how major litigation is run in Australia. At Vannin Capital, we are witnessing those transformations first hand.

The Survey* (the largest survey of corporate counsel on litigation issues and trends, with 606 respondents across the globe) highlights an upward trend in virtually all of the metrics relating to litigation and the broader disputes area. In particular, it identifies an increasingly litigious environment, more regulatory disputes, more class actions, more IP disputes and increasing costs of litigation amongst the top ten most important litigation trends observed by respondents in 2016 Survey.

It is within this business environment that corporate stakeholders are more focused than ever before on managing corporate risk. In-house legal teams are increasingly expected to achieve more with less, and the prospect of embarking on costly litigation to recover damages is increasingly unattractive.

In response, corporate clients are seeking out Alternative Fee Arrangements (AFAs) with 60% of the respondents of the Survey using AFAs in 2016, up from 56% in 2015. The use of AFAs is a well-trodden path and traditionally AFAs were offered through blended rates, capped fees, fixed fees, contingent/ conditional fees and/or "success" fees in some jurisdictions.

Prior to joining Vannin Capital, in my role as partner at law firm Baker McKenzie in the dispute resolution team and as head of the firm's Asia Pacific Risk and Crisis Management Practice Group, this was increasingly a well versed and often vexed topic with clients. Typically, the favoured approach was blended rates and fixed fees for different phases of the litigation. There were opportunities to introduce dispute/litigation funding as a viable alternative funding model, but it wasn't commonplace and clients didn't always understand the opportunities presented to the business. This is changing in corporate Australia.

Our observation is that the emphasis on AFAs, coupled with a rising understanding and appreciation of the benefits of dispute resolution funding, is driving an increase in demand for third party funding solutions from corporate clients (from large multinational corporations to family-owned businesses). This in turn is enabling law firms to successfully run high-value commercial litigation and arbitration without the need to discount hourly rates and to create real value for their clients.

Dispute resolution funding therefore is extending its use from the traditional and well-established area of assisting impecunious plaintiffs (e.g. liquidators) to bring meritorious cases that would otherwise not be run, to assisting many large corporations which can afford to run litigation but which see an opportunity to secure the benefits without the risk.

Below, we outline the key benefits to all businesses (poorly or well-capitalised) that third party funding can provide:

Risk shifting – in much the same way that insurance and other hedging products are used in commerce, the benefits of dispute resolution funding in effectively shifting the entirety of litigation risk from the claimant to a third party, are clear.

Unlocking value – each potential claim is an asset of the company. In a world where growth is scarce, the importance of extracting value from all available company assets has never been higher.

Reduced drain on legal budget – with the costs of running the claim now outsourced to a third party, the legal budget can be more effectively deployed on core activities. Any overrun in the cost of conducting the claim will not be for the account of the business.

Time savings – management and legal team time can be used more effectively on other activities relevant to the business.

Improved settlement prospects – The fact that Vannin is involved can send a powerful message to the defendant that many legal minds (including an independent QC engaged by Vannin and former judges who sit on our investment committee) consider that the case has a strong chance of success. Involving a funder can give the other parties reason to pause and reassess their defence and their own advice on prospects.

Expert assistance – as a funder, Vannin also brings to bear its considerable experience in managing disputes and can add real value by providing strategic input before the proceeding is issued and as the case progresses.

These observations are supported by Peter Cash, partner and leader of Norton Rose Fulbright's Australian Litigation Team:

"I have seen substantial corporate clients make decisions not to pursue what I considered to be very meritorious claims simply because they were uncomfortable with the potential distraction to their in-house legal team of having to manage the litigation process." He adds that "the fact that in-house teams are typically comprised only of transactional and regulatory lawyers can mean that the involvement of a litigation funder such as Vannin, which has specific expertise in managing litigation and liaising effectively with external counsel, will provide considerable efficiencies in the conduct of the litigation."


For businesses that elect to fund a major dispute themselves, the value of the company will inevitably be reduced.

Because the amount of the funds spent on a claim need to be expensed through the P&L, this has a direct impact on EBITDA, the impact of which is multiplied by the prevailing P/E multiple enjoyed by the company. Further, cash spent on pursuing the claim is not then available for strategic growth initiatives, thus having an additional depressive impact on EBITDA.

By utilising TPF, directors can pursue meritorious claims with no financial risk and still benefit from cash receipt should the claim be successful.

For public or private shareholders, the use of TPF therefore has the immediate benefit of maintaining and even increasing shareholder value.


Educating clients and lawyers on the basics of dispute resolution funding is critical. In a very basic sense, lawyers need to recommend dispute resolution funding to clients and clients need to understand how it works and what the benefits to the business are before they will access it. In addition to the aforementioned benefits of businesses using dispute resolution funding, here are some key practical points:

  • Dispute resolution funding is essentially a form of finance and risk transfer.

    Under a Litigation Funding Agreement (LFA) Vannin will pay on behalf of the claimant all of the costs associated with the claim, in return for a fee to be deducted from any damages recovered (together with recoupment of Vannin's costs). Vannin's funding is non-recourse to any of the other assets of a claimant and there is no obligation to make any payments to Vannin unless there is a recovery from the funded legal claim.

    The LFA will also provide that Vannin will indemnify the claimant for any exposure that it might incur as part of the claim (e.g., having to pay the defendants their costs if the claimant is unsuccessful). In this sense, a LFA should achieve a complete transfer of financial expense and risk from the claimant to Vannin.
  • Entry into a LFA does not change the underlying legal relationships.

    The claim remains the property of the claimant, who continues to provide instructions to their chosen lawyers for the conduct of the claim. Vannin's standard LFA provides for a regular flow of information to Vannin from the lawyers with conduct of the claim, regarding the status of the claim and budget tracking. Vannin is also entitled to have input in relation to key strategic decisions, but does not conduct the day-to-day running of the claim.
  • Vannin's LFA also incorporates an ability for the funded corporate claimant to terminate the funding arrangement in certain prescribed circumstances.
  • Vannin's involvement can be tailored to suit each case.

    If the claimant is comfortable and prepared to manage the external lawyers throughout the case, then Vannin's involvement can be minimal. Alternatively, if the claimant would prefer Vannin to have a more active role in managing the case, Vannin is happy to do this and there is no additional charge to the claimant in those circumstances.
  • Vannin's pricing can be tailored to suit each case.

    An appropriate pricing structure can be agreed with the claimant in each case. For example, this could involve a fee based on:

    • Percentage of gross recoveries
    • Flat fee (minimum amount)
    • Multiple of invested amount (i.e., costs)
    • Hybrid of the above
  • In all cases, Vannin will structure its fee so that a significantly lesser rate will be payable in circumstances where prompt settlements are achieved. We have set out below some examples to demonstrate how the numbers look in practice for a funded and unfunded example.
  • The LFA also provides that all information exchanged between Vannin and the claimant will be kept strictly confidential – legal professional privilege will therefore be maintained (i.e., subject to common interest privilege).

    Being a private company, Vannin is not required to publicly disclose the details of any of the investments it makes or the outcomes of the cases it funds. In contrast, dispute resolution funding firms which are listed on securities exchanges are generally required to disclose details of each case funded and the ultimate results of their investments in those cases (being market sensitive information).

    However, it's worth noting that as a professional third party funder, we as a general rule, favour the fact of funding and our identity to be disclosed. Whether and when the fact of funding and our identity is disclosed normally comes down to a strategic decision made by the claimant and their lawyers. With that decision being made in the interest of their dispute, the strategy being pursed in respect to it, and whether it advances the broader interests of their organisation.

Dispute resolution funding can be tailored to the situation and also the appetite for risk mitigation. If we continue to experience more litigious environment as highlighted by Norton Rose Fulbright's Survey, then it is critical that companies are engaged with professional disputes funders who can provide such a financing tool. It is also extremely important to start conversations as early as possible to investigate if funding is a suitable option as an appropriate risk and cost management strategy.


Assuming that the claim cannot be resolved without commencing proceedings, it might be expected that legal fees for the plaintiff could reach $2m by the end of a contested trial and adverse costs exposure (i.e. payment of the other side's costs if the claim is unsuccessful) could be in the order of $1m.

An unfunded plaintiff commencing proceedings in respect of this claim would likely need to provision for a total exposure of up to $3m, which could be expected to increase if the claim was unsuccessful (following a trial). Further allowances would be required for any subsequent appeals.

In addition to the above figure, there will be substantial additional costs for lost management time, in-house legal time spent actively managing the case and the opportunity cost to the business of the expenditure/ provisioning committed to the case.
SETTLEMENT SUM $13,000,000
Reimbursement to Vannin of legal costs – estimated spent to date: $(1,000,000)
Reimbursement to Vannin of costs of providing claimant's adverse costs indemnity – typically 25% of the cover amount given the time at which settlement occurred: $(250,000)
Payment of Vannin's fee – likely to be around 25% of the gross settlement amount given the time at which settlement occurred: $(3,250,000)
In the Funded example, the client receives about two thirds of the settlement amount, which could be achieved with zero financial cost or risk to the claimant. In this scenario, shareholders have seen no impact to EBITDA or value and management have been able to concentrate on growing the underlying business. If the client had self-funded, they would have received $3.5m more, but only by risking $3m in direct costs plus substantial indirect costs.

* Norton Rose Fulbright's 2016 Litigation Trends Annual Survey can be viewed at

Originally published in Funding in Focus, Issue 4 - 2017

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.