Australia: A Developing Trend – Disputes Funding For Corporates

Last Updated: 10 November 2017
Article by Philippa Murphy


According to global law firm Norton Rose Fulbright, and as evidenced by the firm's 2016 Litigation Trends Annual Survey, the use of third party funders in commercial (and other) litigation is transforming how major litigation is run in Australia. At Vannin Capital, we are witnessing those transformations first hand.

The Survey* (the largest survey of corporate counsel on litigation issues and trends, with 606 respondents across the globe) highlights an upward trend in virtually all of the metrics relating to litigation and the broader disputes area. In particular, it identifies an increasingly litigious environment, more regulatory disputes, more class actions, more IP disputes and increasing costs of litigation amongst the top ten most important litigation trends observed by respondents in 2016 Survey.

It is within this business environment that corporate stakeholders are more focused than ever before on managing corporate risk. In-house legal teams are increasingly expected to achieve more with less, and the prospect of embarking on costly litigation to recover damages is increasingly unattractive.

In response, corporate clients are seeking out Alternative Fee Arrangements (AFAs) with 60% of the respondents of the Survey using AFAs in 2016, up from 56% in 2015. The use of AFAs is a well-trodden path and traditionally AFAs were offered through blended rates, capped fees, fixed fees, contingent/ conditional fees and/or "success" fees in some jurisdictions.

Prior to joining Vannin Capital, in my role as partner at law firm Baker McKenzie in the dispute resolution team and as head of the firm's Asia Pacific Risk and Crisis Management Practice Group, this was increasingly a well versed and often vexed topic with clients. Typically, the favoured approach was blended rates and fixed fees for different phases of the litigation. There were opportunities to introduce dispute/litigation funding as a viable alternative funding model, but it wasn't commonplace and clients didn't always understand the opportunities presented to the business. This is changing in corporate Australia.

Our observation is that the emphasis on AFAs, coupled with a rising understanding and appreciation of the benefits of dispute resolution funding, is driving an increase in demand for third party funding solutions from corporate clients (from large multinational corporations to family-owned businesses). This in turn is enabling law firms to successfully run high-value commercial litigation and arbitration without the need to discount hourly rates and to create real value for their clients.

Dispute resolution funding therefore is extending its use from the traditional and well-established area of assisting impecunious plaintiffs (e.g. liquidators) to bring meritorious cases that would otherwise not be run, to assisting many large corporations which can afford to run litigation but which see an opportunity to secure the benefits without the risk.

Below, we outline the key benefits to all businesses (poorly or well-capitalised) that third party funding can provide:

Risk shifting – in much the same way that insurance and other hedging products are used in commerce, the benefits of dispute resolution funding in effectively shifting the entirety of litigation risk from the claimant to a third party, are clear.

Unlocking value – each potential claim is an asset of the company. In a world where growth is scarce, the importance of extracting value from all available company assets has never been higher.

Reduced drain on legal budget – with the costs of running the claim now outsourced to a third party, the legal budget can be more effectively deployed on core activities. Any overrun in the cost of conducting the claim will not be for the account of the business.

Time savings – management and legal team time can be used more effectively on other activities relevant to the business.

Improved settlement prospects – The fact that Vannin is involved can send a powerful message to the defendant that many legal minds (including an independent QC engaged by Vannin and former judges who sit on our investment committee) consider that the case has a strong chance of success. Involving a funder can give the other parties reason to pause and reassess their defence and their own advice on prospects.

Expert assistance – as a funder, Vannin also brings to bear its considerable experience in managing disputes and can add real value by providing strategic input before the proceeding is issued and as the case progresses.

These observations are supported by Peter Cash, partner and leader of Norton Rose Fulbright's Australian Litigation Team:

"I have seen substantial corporate clients make decisions not to pursue what I considered to be very meritorious claims simply because they were uncomfortable with the potential distraction to their in-house legal team of having to manage the litigation process." He adds that "the fact that in-house teams are typically comprised only of transactional and regulatory lawyers can mean that the involvement of a litigation funder such as Vannin, which has specific expertise in managing litigation and liaising effectively with external counsel, will provide considerable efficiencies in the conduct of the litigation."


For businesses that elect to fund a major dispute themselves, the value of the company will inevitably be reduced.

Because the amount of the funds spent on a claim need to be expensed through the P&L, this has a direct impact on EBITDA, the impact of which is multiplied by the prevailing P/E multiple enjoyed by the company. Further, cash spent on pursuing the claim is not then available for strategic growth initiatives, thus having an additional depressive impact on EBITDA.

By utilising TPF, directors can pursue meritorious claims with no financial risk and still benefit from cash receipt should the claim be successful.

For public or private shareholders, the use of TPF therefore has the immediate benefit of maintaining and even increasing shareholder value.


Educating clients and lawyers on the basics of dispute resolution funding is critical. In a very basic sense, lawyers need to recommend dispute resolution funding to clients and clients need to understand how it works and what the benefits to the business are before they will access it. In addition to the aforementioned benefits of businesses using dispute resolution funding, here are some key practical points:

  • Dispute resolution funding is essentially a form of finance and risk transfer.

    Under a Litigation Funding Agreement (LFA) Vannin will pay on behalf of the claimant all of the costs associated with the claim, in return for a fee to be deducted from any damages recovered (together with recoupment of Vannin's costs). Vannin's funding is non-recourse to any of the other assets of a claimant and there is no obligation to make any payments to Vannin unless there is a recovery from the funded legal claim.

    The LFA will also provide that Vannin will indemnify the claimant for any exposure that it might incur as part of the claim (e.g., having to pay the defendants their costs if the claimant is unsuccessful). In this sense, a LFA should achieve a complete transfer of financial expense and risk from the claimant to Vannin.
  • Entry into a LFA does not change the underlying legal relationships.

    The claim remains the property of the claimant, who continues to provide instructions to their chosen lawyers for the conduct of the claim. Vannin's standard LFA provides for a regular flow of information to Vannin from the lawyers with conduct of the claim, regarding the status of the claim and budget tracking. Vannin is also entitled to have input in relation to key strategic decisions, but does not conduct the day-to-day running of the claim.
  • Vannin's LFA also incorporates an ability for the funded corporate claimant to terminate the funding arrangement in certain prescribed circumstances.
  • Vannin's involvement can be tailored to suit each case.

    If the claimant is comfortable and prepared to manage the external lawyers throughout the case, then Vannin's involvement can be minimal. Alternatively, if the claimant would prefer Vannin to have a more active role in managing the case, Vannin is happy to do this and there is no additional charge to the claimant in those circumstances.
  • Vannin's pricing can be tailored to suit each case.

    An appropriate pricing structure can be agreed with the claimant in each case. For example, this could involve a fee based on:

    • Percentage of gross recoveries
    • Flat fee (minimum amount)
    • Multiple of invested amount (i.e., costs)
    • Hybrid of the above
  • In all cases, Vannin will structure its fee so that a significantly lesser rate will be payable in circumstances where prompt settlements are achieved. We have set out below some examples to demonstrate how the numbers look in practice for a funded and unfunded example.
  • The LFA also provides that all information exchanged between Vannin and the claimant will be kept strictly confidential – legal professional privilege will therefore be maintained (i.e., subject to common interest privilege).

    Being a private company, Vannin is not required to publicly disclose the details of any of the investments it makes or the outcomes of the cases it funds. In contrast, dispute resolution funding firms which are listed on securities exchanges are generally required to disclose details of each case funded and the ultimate results of their investments in those cases (being market sensitive information).

    However, it's worth noting that as a professional third party funder, we as a general rule, favour the fact of funding and our identity to be disclosed. Whether and when the fact of funding and our identity is disclosed normally comes down to a strategic decision made by the claimant and their lawyers. With that decision being made in the interest of their dispute, the strategy being pursed in respect to it, and whether it advances the broader interests of their organisation.

Dispute resolution funding can be tailored to the situation and also the appetite for risk mitigation. If we continue to experience more litigious environment as highlighted by Norton Rose Fulbright's Survey, then it is critical that companies are engaged with professional disputes funders who can provide such a financing tool. It is also extremely important to start conversations as early as possible to investigate if funding is a suitable option as an appropriate risk and cost management strategy.


Assuming that the claim cannot be resolved without commencing proceedings, it might be expected that legal fees for the plaintiff could reach $2m by the end of a contested trial and adverse costs exposure (i.e. payment of the other side's costs if the claim is unsuccessful) could be in the order of $1m.

An unfunded plaintiff commencing proceedings in respect of this claim would likely need to provision for a total exposure of up to $3m, which could be expected to increase if the claim was unsuccessful (following a trial). Further allowances would be required for any subsequent appeals.

In addition to the above figure, there will be substantial additional costs for lost management time, in-house legal time spent actively managing the case and the opportunity cost to the business of the expenditure/ provisioning committed to the case.
SETTLEMENT SUM $13,000,000
Reimbursement to Vannin of legal costs – estimated spent to date: $(1,000,000)
Reimbursement to Vannin of costs of providing claimant's adverse costs indemnity – typically 25% of the cover amount given the time at which settlement occurred: $(250,000)
Payment of Vannin's fee – likely to be around 25% of the gross settlement amount given the time at which settlement occurred: $(3,250,000)
In the Funded example, the client receives about two thirds of the settlement amount, which could be achieved with zero financial cost or risk to the claimant. In this scenario, shareholders have seen no impact to EBITDA or value and management have been able to concentrate on growing the underlying business. If the client had self-funded, they would have received $3.5m more, but only by risking $3m in direct costs plus substantial indirect costs.

* Norton Rose Fulbright's 2016 Litigation Trends Annual Survey can be viewed at

Originally published in Funding in Focus, Issue 4 - 2017

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions